Urgent Matters. Notwithstanding anything in Section 3.3 expressed or implied to the contrary, in the event that an urgent issue or matter arises that requires prompt action by the JAC, the JAC shall arrange for a teleconference (or otherwise meet) for the purpose of resolving such issue or matter. Such JAC teleconference or meeting shall take place as promptly as possible, with the immediacy of such issue or matter requiring JAC action determining the time, place and manner of such teleconference or meeting.
Urgent Matters. For any matter designated by the initiating party as “urgent,” the other party shall make its first response within twenty-four hours, or within such other period as the second level persons may agree.
Urgent Matters. Notwithstanding anything in Article 3.5 expressed or implied to the contrary, in the event that an urgent issue or matter arises, that requires prompt action by the JSC, the JSC shall arrange for a teleconference call (or otherwise meet) for the purpose of resolving the issue or matter. Such JSC teleconference call shall take place as promptly as possible, with the immediacy of the issue or matter requiring JSC action determining the time, place and manner of the conduct of the meeting.
Urgent Matters. Notwithstanding anything in Section 3.4 or Section 3.11 expressed or implied to the contrary, in the event that an urgent issue or matter arises, that requires prompt action by the Project Leaders and / or the JPT, the Project Leaders and / or the JPT shall meet for the purpose of resolving the issue or matter. Such meeting shall take place as promptly as possible, with the immediacy of the issue or matter requiring action determining the time, place and manner of the conduct of the meeting
Urgent Matters. If an impasse is reached among the Members so that a decision cannot be obtained by the requisite vote for any decision which a Member or Manager believes in good faith must be made within 90 days in the best interest of the Company; if a Member, Manager, former Member, or former Manager, believes in good faith that its rights under this Agreement will suffer irreparable harm if an order cannot be obtained within 90 days; or if a Member or Manager believes in good faith that the Company’s best interest requires an order of the Court reforming this Agreement or authorizing action within 90 days; then the Company, Member, Manager, former Member, or former Manager may file a civil action in the Superior Court of San Diego County, California, against the Company, any Member, the Manager, any former Member, or any former Manager seeking a restraining order, preliminary injunction, or any other remedy available under California law. If such an action is filed, then the Court shall have authority to issue any order on ex parte application or motion upon good cause shown why the matter should not await resolution in the course of an arbitration hearing under the provisions of this Agreement. Filing such a civil action shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to resolve disputes by binding arbitration pursuant to this Agreement. The parties to any such action (including the plaintiff or plaintiffs in the civil action) may file a motion to compel arbitration of the dispute at any time within 6 months after any such civil action is filed. If permitted by the Court, the parties to any such action shall proceed with civil discovery for up to 6 months after such civil action is filed, whether or not an arbitration proceeding is also pending related to the matter in issue in the civil action, so as to enable the parties to obtain discovery from non-parties to the arbitration through the civil subpoena process for a limited time without waiving their right to arbitration.
Urgent Matters. (1) In case of urgent matters that do not allow to wait for a necessary resolution of the members of the management board of the Company to be passed, each member of the management board may, after having consulted with as many other members of the management board as possible take, with respect to the powers conferred to him or them, the actions necessary to prevent damages to the Company and least likely to make such action irrevocable.
Urgent Matters. Introduction This Scheme of Delegation details the key roles of the Sussex & Surrey Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs), and lists those functions which they designate will be carried out by their respective Deputy Police & Crime Commissioners, the Chief Executives, Treasurers and other staff employed by the PCCs. This Scheme also details those areas of business support that are being provided to the PCCs by staff who are directly employed by the Chief Constables, under the arrangements outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding agreed between the PCCs and their respective Chief Constables. This Scheme of Delegation document is part of the governance arrangements outlined in the overarching Scheme of Corporate Governance for the Sussex & Surrey Police & Crime Commissioners and their respective Chief Constables and should be read in conjunction with other the other governance documents listed in the Statement of Corporate Governance i.e. Financial Regulations, Contract Standing Orders and the Memorandum of Understanding. This Scheme provides a framework which makes sure that business is carried out efficiently and cost effectively, ensuring that decisions are not unnecessarily delayed. This Scheme does not identify all the statutory duties which are contained in specific laws and regulations. The Scheme is to be reviewed annually. The Police and Crime Commissioners may set out reporting arrangements on any authorised powers. Xxxxxx are given to the Chief Constables by laws, orders, rules or regulations. Also, national conditions of employment give powers to the Police and Crime Commissioners or the Chief Constables or, as in the case of police regulations, the Secretary of State for the Home Department. Under Section 18(3) (c) and (6) of the Police Reform & Social Responsibility Act 2011 (‘the Act’), the Police and Crime Commissioner is prohibited from delegating the functions (listed below) listed in subsection (7) of that Act to a police constable (i.e. any warranted police officer). There can therefore be no direct delegation of a function listed in subsection (7) by the Police and Crime Commissioner to the Chief Constable. • Issuing the Police and Crime Plan • Determining objectives in the Police and Crime Plan • Calculation of, and decision on, budget requirements • Making recommendations to the Home Secretary in relation to the appointment of the Chief Constable • Making representations in relation to the appointment of Chief Officer posts • Being ...
Urgent Matters. 12.1 If any matter which would normally be referred to the Police and Crime Commissioner (or Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner, if appointed) for a decision arises and cannot be delayed, the matter may be decided by the appropriate chief officer.
Urgent Matters. 12.1 The Clerk of the Joint Committee shall be empowered to act on behalf of the Joint Committee and in accordance with its functions in cases of urgency and having first consulted the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Joint Committee. Any decision taken under this Standing Order shall be reported to the next meeting of the Joint Committee.
Urgent Matters. Nothing in this clause will prevent either party from seeking an order in the nature of an injunction from the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal in respect of genuinely urgent matters. MODEL CONTRACT FOR OWNER DRIVERS 21 PART 7 – MISCELLANEOUS 32. ASSIGNMENT Either party may, with the consent of the other party and the assignee, assign their rights and obligations under this contract to another person (the assignee) in which case this contract will continue as if there had been no termination of the contract.
