Usefulness Sample Clauses

Usefulness of multimodality imaging for detecting differences in temporal occurrence of left ventricular systolic mechanical events in healthy young adults n ajmone xxxxxx, X X Xxxx, X X X Xxxxxxxxxx, V Xxxxxxx, X xx Xxxx, X X xxx xxx Xxxx, X X Xxxxxxx, and X X Xxx abstract objectives: Detailed information about the absolute temporal occurrence of myocardial motion and deformation events during the cardiac cycle is still lacking. However, the normal time-range of these parameters may be of great importance as a reference for detecting and interpreting mechanical dyssynchrony and for iden- tifying a delayed contraction in case of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine in young healthy subjects and for different LV segments the value of: 1) time to peak systolic longitudinal velocity, displacement, strain rate and strain, using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI); 2) time to minimum systolic volume, using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) and 3) time to maxi- mum thickness, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). methods: A total of 20 young healthy volunteers (13 men, mean age 32±4 years) underwent both cardiac MRI and echocardiografic examination, including TDI and RT3DE. To define LV ejection time and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), aortic valve closure and opening and mitral valve opening were identified. results: For all LV segments, longitudinal peak systolic velocity and strain rate were early-systolic events. Peak systolic longitudinal displacement and strain, in turn, occurred in the late systole or, in 20-30% of LV segments, during IVRT, similarly to minimum systolic volume and maximum myocardial thickness.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Usefulness. An assessment of the usefulness of a surveillance system with respect to program objectives Accuracy Degree to which a measurement or an estimate based on measurements represents the true value of the attribute that is being measured Cost Indirect and direct costs, measured in relation to the benefits obtained. Validity Degree to which statistical information correctly describes the phenomena it was designed to measure. Negative predictive value The proportion of cases reported to the system that actually have no the health event Completeness Proportion of all expected data reports that were actually submitted to the public health surveillance system. General Initial evaluation First attempt to evaluate the PHSS after establishment Compare systems Comparison of different PHSS (e.g., paper-based, laboratory, electronic) of the same health outcome Formal request Assessment of PHSS at request of owner or external stakeholder Economic Determine costs Determine cost of PHSS because of need to prioritize (e.g., downsize) Technical Data quality monitoring Undercover problems with data quality (e.g., underreporting) New technology or innovation New software, technology, or innovation that may enhance PHSS effectiveness or efficiency (e.g., mobile phones, e-surveillance) New component New standards Need to know if new PHSS standards (e.g., list of reportable health outcomes, determine if surveillance objectives are appropriate) Change in definitions Change in case definition(s) may impact case classification Syndromic surveillance Is syndromic surveillance system accepted by its users and effective for outbreak detection and trends assessments? Emergency Mass gathering Determine if the existing PHSS can manage the special circumstances of the mass gathering event or if other components need to be added Occurrence of public health event Can the current surveillance system handle early warning and response function in case of outbreaks, epidemic and pandemic? Preparedness Assess how surveillance system can contribute to emerging communicable disease that can represent a global threat. Public Change in public Capacity of the surveillance system to measure health measure health policy the impact of the change in a public health policy (e.g. introduction of a new vaccine, management of antimicrobial resistance) on the concerned population. Introduction of new control measure(s) Can surveillance system collect the necessary information (e.g. disease incidence and prevale...
Usefulness. The owners must specify the storage of the tools they provide and notify the lessee that they are responsible for the payment of all other services. Other terms. You can include all the other basic concepts you want in this section. If you use our model or form that has a similar part to avoid ambiguous, please write if there are no other terms for the lease. Signatures. The signatures are required by the owner and all the tenants who are part of the lease. These signatures are what is officially restricted. In addition to the specific content mentioned above, there are some tips to help you write an effective lease: Connect a few other elements. If your assets were built until 1978, federal laws make you submit to potential tenants who reveal colors according to colors. You also need to provide the tenant movement in the management list, which will be explained in more detail below. Your state or local law may also require additional additives. Change. You may have more information you want to include from the agreement, but you don't want to use longer leases. For your specific lease, you can include additions with any other information. If you decide to add additions, be sure to direct it to the agreement (perhaps under other terms) and also have separate signature lines in the replacement. Keep a signed copy. The owner and the tenant must protect the signed copy of the agreement. What to do after signing the lease by sending a lease of the tenant's greeting, signing the lease, will haveSend a welcome letter to the tenant. A tenant welcome letter is a letter that officially welcomes the new tenant before the tenancy begins. A tenant welcome letter provides information to the tenant smoothly to a new home. This usually includes resources, contact information, a reminder of important policies and responsibilities, and a pre-screening checklist. When sending a moving check management list in addition to sending a tenant welcome letter, it's also a good idea to plan the time you'll be doing with the tenant. Using a tenant installation checklist, this inspection should document the condition of the property prior to tenant occupancy. This inspection will also ensure that the tenant's property is in good condition and that the tenant has a good understanding of the landlord's expectations for the property. Updated 2023 February 17. A lease is a lessor's agreement under which a property is leased to a lessee for monthly payments. The first (1) month's rent and...
Usefulness. As shown in Table 3, the majority of the reports (76 per cent) contained useful recommendations. For instance, the evaluation of regulation 2679/ 98 (strawberry regulation) clearly recommends the Commission to choose one out of four policy options, both in its main text and in a brief summary. Conversely, the evaluative study of directive 1997/81 on part- time work provides neither a summary nor final recommendations, despite its length of 276 pages. Accessibility of the reports scored lower, with 64 per cent of the reports having a concise executive summary.
Usefulness. Transparency
Usefulness of measuring size and growth of digital heritage collections
Usefulness. Usability
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Usefulness. Select this check box if each roommate is responsible for the Service Charges and lists the names of the joint tenants. 20. Check this box if fellow citizens pay their share of energy costs. Enter the number of days in which the payment is due.

Related to Usefulness

  • Quality All products will be new and unused. All products provided by the Contractor must meet all federal, state, and local standards for quality and safety requirements. Products not meeting the requirements of this section will be deemed unacceptable and returned to the Contractor for credit at no charge to the State.

  • Suitability The Dealer Manager will offer Shares, and in its agreement with each Soliciting Dealer will require that the Soliciting Dealer offer Shares, only to Persons that it has reasonable grounds to believe meet the financial qualifications set forth in the Prospectus or in any suitability letter or memorandum sent to it by the Company and will only make offers to Persons in the states in which it is advised in writing by the Company that the Shares are qualified for sale or that such qualification is not required. In offering Shares, the Dealer Manager will comply, and in its agreements with the Soliciting Dealers, the Dealer Manager will require that the Soliciting Dealers comply, with the provisions of all applicable rules and regulations relating to suitability of investors, including without limitation the FINRA Conduct Rules and the provisions of Article III.C. of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts of the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (the “NASAA Guidelines”). The Dealer Manager agrees that in recommending the purchase of the Shares in the Primary Offering to an investor, the Dealer Manager and each Person associated with the Dealer Manager that make such recommendation shall have, and each Soliciting Dealer in its Soliciting Dealer Agreement shall agree with respect to investors to which it makes a recommendation shall agree that it shall have, reasonable grounds to believe, on the basis of information obtained from the investor concerning the investor’s investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs, and any other information known by the Dealer Manager, the Person associated with the Dealer Manager or the Soliciting Dealer that: (i) the investor is or will be in a financial position appropriate to enable the investor to realize to a significant extent the benefits described in the Prospectus, including the tax benefits where they are a significant aspect of the Company; (ii) the investor has a fair market net worth sufficient to sustain the risks inherent in the program, including loss of investment and lack of liquidity; and (iii) an investment in the Shares offered in the Primary Offering is otherwise suitable for the investor. The Dealer Manager agrees as to investors to whom it makes a recommendation with respect to the purchase of the Shares in the Primary Offering (and each Soliciting Dealer in its Soliciting Dealer Agreement shall agree, with respect to investors to whom it makes such recommendations) to maintain in the files of the Dealer Manager (or the Soliciting Dealer, as applicable) documents disclosing the basis upon which the determination of suitability was reached as to each investor. In making the determinations as to financial qualifications and as to suitability required by the NASAA Guidelines, the Dealer Manager and Soliciting Dealers may rely on (A) representations from investment advisers who are not affiliated with a Soliciting Dealer, banks acting as trustees or fiduciaries, and (B) information it has obtained from a prospective investor, including such information as the investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs of the Person or any other information known by the Dealer Manager (or Soliciting Dealer, as applicable), after due inquiry. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Dealer Manager shall not, and each Soliciting Dealer shall agree not to, execute any transaction in the Company in a discretionary account without prior written approval of the transaction by the customer.

  • Visibility 1. Unless the Council of Europe requests or agrees otherwise, the Grantee shall take all necessary measures to publicise the fact that the Action has been funded within the framework of a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe. Information given to the press and to the beneficiaries of the Action, all related publicity material, official notices, reports and publications, shall acknowledge that the Action was carried out with a grant from a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe and shall display in an appropriate way the Joint Projects’ visual identity (for instructions on use of the Joint Projects’ visual identity, see Appendix IV). 2. In cases where equipment or major items have been purchased using funds provided by the European Union or the Council of Europe, the Grantee shall indicate this clearly on that equipment and those major items (including display of the European Union and Council of Europe’s logos), provided that such actions do not jeopardise the safety and security of the Grantee’s staff. 3. The acknowledgement and Joint Projects’ visual identity shall be clearly visible in a manner that will not create any confusion regarding the identification of the Acton as a project of the Grantee and the ownership of the equipment and items by the Grantee. 4. All publications by the Grantee pertaining to the Action that have received funding from a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe, in whatever form and whatever medium, including the Internet, shall carry the following or a similar disclaimer: “This document has been produced using funds of a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Council of Europe”. 5. If the equipment purchased with a grant from a Joint Project is not transferred to the local partners of the Grantee or to the final recipient of the Action at the end of the implementation period of this Agreement, the visibility requirements as regards this equipment shall continue to apply between the end of the implementation period of this Agreement and the end of the Joint Project, if the latter lasts longer. 6. All layouts of any communication items prepared by the Grantee are subject to approval with the Contact point within the Council of Europe. 7. The Grantee accepts that the European Union and the Council of Europe may publish in any form and medium, including on their websites, the name and address of the Grantee, the purpose and amount of the grant and, if relevant, the percentage of co-financing.

  • Dependability a) Requires constant supervision to perform daily routine correctly b) Occasionally misses necessary task c) Rarely misses necessary task and is reliable d) Outstanding reliability and job is always completed correctly

  • Integrity accountability, honesty and professional, ethical conduct in all that we do. Justice – valuing diversity, achieving health equality, cultural respect and a fair share for all.

  • Timeliness Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

  • Noninfringement The Goods, Services, Deliverables, and Contractor’s performance under this Agreement do not infringe, or constitute an infringement, misappropriation or violation of, any third party’s intellectual property right.

  • Grievability Denial of a petition for reinstatement is grievable. The grievance may not be based on information other than that shared with the Employer at the time of the petition for reinstatement.

  • Fitness The Contractor warrants that any material supplied to the State shall fully conform to all requirements of the Contract and all representations of the Contractor, and shall be fit for all purposes and uses required by the Contract.

  • Functionality Customer is entitled to additional functionality previously purchased or bundled with the software if available in the version or update released on or after the start date of the Agreement. Customer acknowledges that certain functionality in current and previous software versions may not be available in future upgrades. Added functionality may require additional paid services (clinical and technical) to configure and support.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!