Assumptions and Risks. Any assumption or risk external to the Program that underlies the accomplishment of the Program Objective, Project Objectives and Activity outcomes and outputs. However, such assumptions and risks will not excuse any Party’s performance unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the Parties.
Assumptions and Risks. The programme assumes that the beneficiary countries will maintain their efforts to ensure a high level of nuclear safety and to implement the recommendations of the June 2001 Council Report on Nuclear Safety in the Context of Enlargement. The Peer Review Status Report, established by the Council’s Atomic Questions Group and its ad-hoc formation Working Party on Nuclear Safety on 5 June 2002, found that candidate countries are clearly committed to fulfil the recommendations set out in the Council Report, both for nuclear power plants and other types of installations. The status report also noted that all candidate countries had accepted the recommendations. This programme assumes that the beneficiary countries will continue to pay sufficient attention and devote appropriate effort to implementing the supported projects also – where and when applicable – under the EDIS in a time frame reaching beyond accession. Whilst there are no identifiable risks inherent in the tasks to be fulfilled under the various projects, an overall risk to the programme is that continued nuclear safety assistance involves the danger to create dependency on this side of the beneficiary. Special regard has to be directed towards the way in which the beneficiary organisations will sustain the results of the projects. In the cases of regulatory assistance, emphasis needs to be laid on the value of transferring know-how to the recipient and avoiding the replacement of functions in the sphere of responsibility of the beneficiary organisation through activities of the contractor.
Assumptions and Risks. Any assumption or risk external to the Program that underlies the accomplishment of the Program Objective, Project Objective and Activity outcomes and outputs.
Assumptions and Risks. To produce the expected results, in line with the project specific and overall objectives, the intervention rested on a number of key assumptions identified in the Description of Action. These assumptions were constantly monitored by the project management team through internal monitoring frameworks.
Assumptions and Risks. The M&E Plan will also outline key assumptions and risks that underlie the program logic. However, such assumptions and risks will not excuse any Party’s performance unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the other Party. The known assumptions and risks include: 1 As used in this Compact, the term “beneficiary” has the meaning described MCC’s Guidelines for Economic and Beneficiary Analysis.
Assumptions and Risks. 3.3.1 General Assumptions and Risks Use or disclosure of data on this page is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 4
Assumptions and Risks. 3.3.1 General Assumptions and Risks Details have been removed from the public document for business confidentiality and competitiveness reasons Details have been removed from the public document for business confidentiality and competitiveness reasons WCI Hosting and Tracking System Services December 20, 2019
Assumptions and Risks. Assumptions Political support from the partner countries' ministries, authorities and agencies at national as well as at regional level is needed to reach the specific objectives of the Project. This support has been ensured during the two previous phases (EMBLAS-I and EMBLAS-II) in which all three countries participated and is expected to continue in phase III, when planned pilot activities will be further implemented. The Project takes into account Georgia and Ukraine needs in transposition of EU environment-related legislation into national laws and policies, in particular the MSFD and WFD, and their consequent implementation. Signing and enforcement of EU Association Agreements by Georgia and Ukraine serve as a further impetus to this project and will ensure sustainability of its actions in the long-term run. The project takes also into account the interest of Russian Federation towards the MSFD principles and the general harmonization process in the region taking place under the Bucharest Convention and other agreements related to the Black Sea environment protection. It is also expected that governments will allocate the necessary resources to sustain the improved capacity for the environmental monitoring and assessment of the Black Sea, built-up as part of this action. Although it is not assumed that three governments will adopt elements and principles of the MSFD in their plans, it is envisaged that they are ready and interested in learning and practicing its implementation on fully or as a pilot activity. This readiness was confirmed during implementation of EMBLAS-I, as well as EMBLAS-II. Risks The main risks which may impact on a successful implementation are: Risk Response /Mitigation measures Continued administrative and structural difficulties and unstable political situation in the countries. Recently, both Ukraine and Georgia have faced administrative reforms which affected the field of environmental protection. The internal reorganizations of relevant ministries were expected to create certain difficulties; however, this risk was mitigated by the work done during the preparatory action, which allowed identifying credible interlocutors in the relevant ministries in each country. The situation in both countries has stabilised; however, it is recommended to permanently monitor the situation in the countries for possible future changes in the governance framework of environmental protection. Political relationships of Russian Federation with U...
Assumptions and Risks. Details have been removed from the public document for business confidentiality and competitiveness reasons.
Assumptions and Risks. Details have been removed from the public document for business confidentiality and competiveness reasons. Use or disclosure of data on this page is subject to the restriction on Page 1 of this proposal or quotation. 3
