Comparison. All statements furnished under clauses (a) or (b) above shall set forth in comparative form the amount for the end of the corresponding fiscal year, or corresponding period of the preceding fiscal year, as the case may be.
Comparison. Attach an itemized comparison of the proposed substitution with product specified, including test performance data.
Comparison. For the purpose of assessing compatibility with television stations (see section 5.1 above) or protection to service areas of existing sound broadcasting transmitters (see section 5.2 above), the existing situation has been used as a reference situation and has been compared with the new Plan in the course of its development. To permit these comparisons, it has been necessary to calculate (as in section 5.6 below) the usable field strength (Eu) for all television transmitters and all existing sound broadcasting stations (as in sections 5.1 and 5.2 above) at a number of test locations (not more than 12) within the existing service area, as specified by the administrations concerned.
Comparison. Where the information compares investment or ancillary services, financial instruments or persons providing investment or ancillary services, the following conditions need to be satisfied: • The comparison must be meaningful and presented in a fair and balanced way. • The sources of the information used for the comparison must be specified. • The key facts and assumptions used to make the comparison must be included. FINANCIAL SUCCESS Promising financial success, whether implied or explicit, is prohibited. • Do not promise profits. • Do not make unwarranted claims of success by other traders or yourself. • Do not promise that one can learn to trade easily or profitably unless the word “learn” is connected with thedemo mode or the platform usage. • Do not use the word "play" or “game” even when the advertisement/promotional material is related to demo mode/ practice mode, as the word “play” or “game” implies that our services, even the demo service isa game, thereby undermining risks involved. Practical examples of the above restrictions are as follows: “Say”: • "Easy learning platform" • "Simple platform tools" • "Easy to use the platform" • "Easy to navigate the platform" • "Intuitive platform" • "User-friendly platform" • "Practice trading using an unlimited demo account" • "Get to know to trade using your free demo account" • "Learn how to use the platform by trading in the demo mode" • "You can learn to trade using a demo account on the platform and start trading anywhere, anytime" Do not say: • "Easy profits with Freedom Finance Europe Ltd." • "Guaranteed profits by trading with our platform" • "Trading is simple to learn with us" • "Start learning to trade, and make a profit anywhere and anytime” • "Trading is simple, even for beginners"
Comparison. Four scenarios were reviewed in order to compare the options that Columbia County has to review. The scenarios were prepared to illustrate a range starting with our Current License (Scenario 1) all the way up to the Enterprise Agreement (Scenario 4). Scenarios 2 and 3 are provided to show compare the cost of the licensing that ESRI offers vs. the EA. • Scenario 1 has glaring shortcomings because we are 1) Short on AGOL licenses, 2) In need of additional ArcGIS Desktop licenses, and 3) Short on ArcGIS Enterprise licenses for the number of cores on our servers. In short, Scenario 1 is shown to illustrate what we have now but it is not a viable path forward. The annual amount for maintenance of these licenses is subject to change (per contract), so the amount shown below is an estimate subject to increase by a few hundred dollars per year. • Scenario 2 illustrates 100% compliance and coverage for growth. “Growth”, means that we can install ArcGIS Desktop for more end users and accommodate new personnel using the ArgGIS Collector and ArcGIS online. • Scenario 3 illustrates the purchase of more licenses, but not necessarily permitting room for growth. Scenario 3 is currently programmed for 5 more ArcGIS licenses instead of the 10 in Scenario 2. We could change the number of AGOL licenses to save money, but there are already over 100 potential users of those tools. • Scenario 4 is the Enterprise Agreement. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Description Existing License Situation 100% Compliance and New Licenses to cover new needs with room for growth 100% Compliance and New Licenses to cover bare minimum needs. Enterprise Agreement Quick Assessment We are “under- licensed” in certain areas and cannot meet demands. This option is not realistic because we will need growth, so the numbers will change based on future purchases. This option covers compliance and all identified growth needs. This option covers compliance but could leave some customers in need. This covers all our potential needs. Capital / New License Cost (one- time purchases) $0 $193,800.00 $138,800.00 $0.00 Annual Maintenance Cost $46,564.11 (includes County GIS + Broadband) $120,644.11 $84,404.11 $109,500.00 (will include $6,000 for Geoevent) 3-Year Maintenance Fee $139,692.33 $361,932.33 $253,212.33 $328,500.00 Total Expenditure $139,692.33 $555,732.33 $392,012.33 $328,500.00 CONCLUSION The licensing scheme applied by ESRI has been geared to push customers the size of Columbia County to ...
Comparison. This section makes a comparison amongst TLPKA, Du et al., Liu et al., and Xxxxx et al.’s. The comparison is divided into three parts: security property, computation overhead, and communication overhead.
Comparison. 8.2.5.1 Compare with a file... (CTRL+K) Opens a second file and lays it over the first file that has been opened. It is only possible to compare files for the Smarty devices compatible with each other (see following table), for example, it is not possible to compare JR with SSR files, or TNTR with REVO. The sample files are read only and can not be modified! The colors and way of visualization of the comparison file can be customized in the basic options.
Comparison. CTRL + K Compared with file... CTRL + SHIFT + K Remove comparison 11 Mouse and keyboard in the map views
Comparison. Every 6 months following the Effective Date, the Franchisor will compare the Gross Fees of the Franchisee for Customers whose primary offices are located in the Territory, with the average gross fees attributable to other franchisees having, in the opinion of the Franchisor, a substantially similar territory or market as the Franchisee. The Franchisor will notify the Franchisee of the results of such comparison.
Comparison. If we compare the statistics of the population and the Party elite of Kayseri and Balıkesir a number of differences and similarities emerge. First of all, although the city of Kayseri had almost twice the population of Balıkesir, the province of Balıkesir had twice the population of the province of Kayseri. Secondly, the workforce of the city of Balıkesir was quite different from that in Kayseri. The percentage of civil servants was 20% in Balıkesir and only 10% in Kayseri, indicating a far stronger state presence (state departments, educational and administrative institutions, civil servants and professions) in Balıkesir.263 This presence is also evident if we compare the percentage of students in the population of the two cities; 10% in Balıkesir, a mere 6% in Kayseri. The comparison of the number of schoolteachers between the two towns and their surrounding provinces yields the same results: for 229 (107 women) teachers in the town of Balıkesir in 1932, just 88 (18 women) teachers in Kayseri. Similarly 260 (35 women) teachers were employeed in the rest of the province of Balıkesir, and just 141 (6 women) in Kayseri.264 The percentages of farmers and merchants are almost identical for both cities, while the numbers of industrial workers and artisans are quite dissimilar indicating the presence of a growing industrial workforce in the factories of Kayseri, something missing in the city of Balıkesir (18,4% in Balıkesir, 29,4% in Kayseri). Interestingly the comparison of the Party elite (Party Administrative Committees) of the province of Kayseri and Balıkesir does not yield any analogous differentiation. On the contrary, there is not any great dissimilarity between the Party bosses of the two provinces; there is a slight larger number of civil servants and merchants in the Administrative Committees of the city of Balıkesir, but what differentiates the two cities, i.e. the industrial working force, is completely absent from the Party statistics. In other words, the local Party leaders in both cities (and in the rest of the towns of the two provinces) were by and large stemming from the commercial and artisanal segments of the local society. A number of professions (doctors, lawyers) and various state employees were also Party executive members, mostly in the two cities rather than in the smaller towns, a quite reasonable phenomenon given that the occupational environment of these occupational groups, related as it is with the presence of state services (hos...
