Cybercrime. 1. The Parties recognise that cybercrime is a global problem requiring global responses. To that end, the Parties shall strengthen cooperation to prevent and combat cybercrime through the exchange of information and practical knowledge, in compliance with their respective legal frameworks and laws. The Parties shall endeavour to work together, where appropriate, to provide assistance and support to other states in the development of effective laws, policies and practices to prevent and combat cybercrime wherever it occurs.
Cybercrime. 3. The Parties shall enhance bilateral, regional and international cooperation in this field, including cooperation that involves Europol. The Parties shall further develop their cooperation as regards, inter alia:
Cybercrime. 1. Each Party has designated a point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis according to the Budapest Convention in order to ensure the provision of immediate assistance for the purpose of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences related to computer systems and data, or for the collection of evidence in electronic form of a criminal offence (including in real time, where appropriate/feasible) regarding the following matters:
Cybercrime. If you have reason to believe you may be the victim of an online crime, such as identity theft, fraud, infringement, or hacking, you may contact the Internet Crime Complaint Center, at xxx.xx0.xxx, a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). IMPORTANT: FALSE OR INACCURATE ACCUSATIONS THAT OTHERS HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME, INAPPROPRIATE ACT, OR VIOLATION OF THIS AGREEMENT, COULD BE A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL LAW, OR OTHERWISE EXPOSE YOU TO LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES (INCLUDING COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES).
Cybercrime. The Parties shall enhance bilateral, regional and international cooperation among law-enforcement bodies, including training and experience sharing. The Parties shall implement effectively the relevant international standards, in particular those enshrined in the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime adopted by the UN General Assembly resolution A/RES/55/25 on 8 January 2001 and the Protocols thereto.
Cybercrime. This threat is caused by individuals or organizations engaged in the illegal use of information resources or unwarranted interference with such resources for criminal purposes. Its features include entering into information systems for compromising the integrity, availability and confidentiality of information; intentionally producing and distributing computer viruses and other malicious programs; implementing DOS-attacks (denial of Service) and other negative impacts; damaging information resources; violating legal rights and freedoms of citizens in the field of information, including intellectual property rights and privacy; using information resources and methods to commit crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, extortion, smuggling, drug trafficking, child pornography, etc.
Cybercrime. Hypotheses in relation to this section of the survey include: People with higher confidence in using internet for payment-related activities are more likely to comply with the laws concerning cybercrimes, even if they think some cybercrimes are not “morally” wrong. Particularly regarding cybercrimes, people assess as a crime only activities that are considered as morally wrong in a given society and not the activities proscribed by the existing laws. The mass-nature of specific cybercrimes (e.g. download and use of illegal software and other content) is not due to the lack of knowledge that the given activity is a crime but due to the attitudes towards these activities as “socially acceptable”. Perceptions towards cybercrimes as criminal activities are related to the fact whether the victim of the crime could be directly identified and thus, the crime will be harmful for him/her or there is not a direct victim and nobody will sustain a direct loss.
Cybercrime. The FIDUCIA survey has an entire section dedicated to cybercrime, in relation to security concerns, online harassment, victimization, and their moral views on illegal online activity (Q125a-Q125i). First, the respondents are questioned on their frequency of a list of online activities, including online banking, social networking, and downloading music (Q125a). Second, the questions aim to determine their level of confidence in the security features of namely online banking, buying goods or services, and use of online administrative services that require payments offered by local or national government authorities (Q125b). They are asked to reflect on how security issues have caused them to change their Internet habits (Q125c), and to respond to whether they have ever been victims of online harassment (Q125d). The concept of being a victim of online criminal activity is the third and final portion of the cybercrime section of the survey. The questions here intend to determine what kind of online criminal activity they have become a victim of (Q125e), what kind of internet activity they are concern about (Q125f), if they have ever had their online accounts hacked or compromised (Q125h), and how much money they have lost due to online fraud and other online criminal activity in the past three years (Q125i).
Cybercrime. The FIDUCIA survey touches upon cybercrime, specifically on the notion of how wrong it is to illegally download internet material, and the level of concern over being or becoming a victim of cybercrime. The purpose is to compare the results between cybercrime as a “new crime” and other everyday crimes, and determine whether they have the same or similar relationship of trust in justice, perceived legitimacy and compliance. Cybercrime encompasses a number of criminal activities that have become more numerous in recent years due to technological advancements and the increased use of Internet services such as online banking and social networking. The survey intends to determine what aspects of online criminal activity have had more of an impact in these selected countries. The purpose is to correlate the criminal activity with the trust, or lack thereof, of online security measures being taken.
