Data Sharing Agreements. The Sheriff’s Office shall ensure a data sharing Business Associates Agreement is developed between the partner agencies. The data sharing agreement shall address client confidentiality as set forth under 42 C.F.R. Part 2 and HIPAA law and regulations. A Business Associate Agreement to share assessments and screenings is required for any program that has more than one treatment subcontractor, the contractor, and agency rendering services in the jail.
Data Sharing Agreements. The Contractor is prepared to initiate MOUs and/or data-sharing agreements, only where necessary, with relevant agencies and stakeholders to complete Supportive Housing projections for the specified populations. While the Contractor does not currently have agreements in place with agencies in Florida, they have entered into such agreements previously with organizations and entities in the state through prior work and have extensive experience in establishing these types of agreements in communities across the country. Additionally, the Contractor has developed templates and models of such agreements in the format necessary to accomplish the goals of the needs assessment. However, the Contractor does not foresee that there will be a need for formal agreements given that aggregate data will be utilized for this assessment. The Contractor’s Data and Analytics team, which has extensive experience coaching communities through the data sharing process, will be involved in conversations with agency representatives around data needs. The Contractor has identified a number of agencies that maintain datasets relevant to our proposed methodology and the specified populations and subpopulations requested in the ITN. As the Contractor will not require access to any individually identifiable data, or any datasets containing Personally Identifiable Information (PII), nor data protected under HIPAA in order to conduct the needs assessment, the Contractor will seek out MOUs with each relevant agency that describe the format of data to be received and the purposes of the data release. Should the situation arise where relevant agencies are incapable of sharing data, or the acquisition of the data is prohibitive, the Contractor will identify placeholder data from statewide sources and will apportion data to jurisdictions based on population size or another relevant variable.
Data Sharing Agreements. Through participation in the Inter-Organizational Agreements (IOA) Collaborative (a part of the Alaska HISPC project) with five other states, Alaska developed both public entity-to-public entity, private entity-to-private entity, and public entity-to-private entity Data Sharing Agreements (DSAs). One of the primary goals in drafting the DSAs was to enable the secure flow of information between parties, with special attention paid to the privacy of such information. The DSAs were also specifically drafted to avoid the need for significant negotiation between the parties. Further legal work will transform these DSAs to be used as trust agreements between the various participants in the HIE to facilitate intra- and interstate electronic HIE. Tailoring, negotiating and procuring these agreements will be a responsibility of AeHN and the SDE. The AeHN will: Tailor Business Associate agreements to HIE purposes and only use as necessary and appropriate for the parties involved Provide education regarding proper use and application of business associate agreements Determine whether it would be more successful to allow patients and providers to opt-in or opt-out, and which system would be more efficient and cost effective Standardize forms for use by all participating organizations and patients Determine whether it would be beneficial to enter into DSAs with other states and outside organizations, and if so, assist in negotiating such agreements The AeHN will be responsible for obtaining the signed DSAs from participating organizations. Data use policies to identify uses of data for public health will also be developed and implemented as required by state and federal law. Additional policies and procedures related to the sharing of Public Health data were identified during the Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) sessions in winter 2011. AeHN will further develop these policies and procedures by: Setting minimum authorization standards for all participant organizations Standardizing policies, procedures and training regarding general confidentiality of all patient information, including financial and other personal information including, but not limited to health information Standardizing policies, procedures and training regarding use and disclosure of health information in accordance with HIPAA and state law, including use and disclosure by personal representatives and/or health care power of attorneys Identifying proper access and permission levels...
Data Sharing Agreements. The Contractor is prepared to initiate MOUs and/or data-sharing agreements, only where necessary, with relevant agencies and stakeholders to complete Supportive Housing projections for the specified populations. While the Contractor does not currently have agreements in place with agencies in Florida, they have entered into such agreements previously with organizations and entities in the state through prior work and have extensive experience in establishing these types of agreements in communities across the country. Additionally, the Contractor has developed templates and models of such agreements in the format necessary to accomplish the goals of the needs assessment. However, the Contractor does not foresee that there will be a need for formal agreements given that aggregate data will be utilized for this assessment. The Contractor’s Data and Analytics team, which has extensive experience coaching communities through the data sharing process, will be involved in conversations with agency representatives around data needs. The Contractor has identified a number of agencies that maintain datasets relevant to our proposed methodology and the specified populations and subpopulations requested in the ITN. As the Contractor will not require access to any individually identifiable data, or any datasets containing Personally Identifiable Information (PII), nor data protected under HIPAA in order to conduct the needs assessment, the Contractor will seek out MOUs with each relevant agency that describe the format of data to be received and the purposes of the data release. Should the situation arise where relevant agencies are incapable of sharing data, or the acquisition of the data is prohibitive, the Contractor will identify placeholder data from statewide sources and will apportion data to jurisdictions based on population size or another relevant variable. Key Data Sources: Agencies from which data may be sought include: the Florida Department of Children and Families, including the State Office on Homelessness, Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health; Child Welfare; and Domestic Violence; the Managing Entities; Community Based Care Agencies; the Florida Department of Elder Affairs; the Agency for Persons with Disabilities; the Florida Department of Health; the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration; the Florida Department of Corrections; and other relevant local agencies and stakeholders to obtain targeted point in time samples of de-identified d...
Data Sharing Agreements. S/No Agreement title Description Agreement date 1 Information Sharing Protocol for the transfer of Food Crime and Incidents Information Information relating to criminal convictions or offences July 2017 revised Sept 2020 2 Data Sharing Agreement for Regulated Products Service Information related to risk assessment of new products TBA 3 Data Sharing Agreement for risk tracker To collate and store evidence packages containing risk assessments and reports on ‘other legitimate factors’ such as economic impact and consumer perception. TBA Annex C: Science and evidence protocol
Data Sharing Agreements. S/No Agreement title Description Agreement date Mechanisms for commissioning research and other evidence gathering activities
Data Sharing Agreements. Tables 1 and 2 list the legal and licensing agreements reached for each sharable SAVAS resource, per language. As it can be seen in the table, the collection of legal data and the identification of the most adequate licenses for the resources owned by the data providers in the consortium has been achieved. The legal status has been cleared for almost all results owned by the SAVAS partners. Regarding licensing, a general consensus has been found on the following principles: ● Resources will be made available to any interested party (also to non META-SHARE members) ● Resource Attribution will be required ● Derivatives will be allowed ● "Share alike" licenses will be used for derivatives ● Commercial and Research licenses will be provided ● A fee will be charged for Commercial licenses ● Research licenses will be provided for free/for-a-fee The only remaining discussion still ongoing within the consortium is linked to the level of restriction of the transcribed audio datasets for research purposes. While some partners are willing to share them for free and allow derivative works, others are concerned this may have a negative impact in the long term at exploitation level. The consortium is aware of several potential competitors which are backed up by research centers who could easily get hold of the transcribed audio datasets and use them to improve the commercial systems of their partners, bringing to the market similar transcription and dictation systems as those developed within the project. More restrictive license schemes are being considered to avoid this, while allowing their use as evaluation benchmarks The legal and licensing status of the resources owned by third-parties is still under discussion. Negotiations have been launched for those resources owned by third- parties (such as French audio or German crawled texts) and the corresponding licensing schemes are under discussion. We plan to advance these discussions during the next few months and expect to close legal and licensing negotiations for all the SAVAS resources before their distribution through the SAVAS META-SHARE repository, forecasted to be made available by the end of April 2014. Crawled news ETB 12M C-XxXxX-FF CC BY NC SA Spanish Audio Broadcast news ETB 200 h C-XxXxX-FF CC BY NC SA Crawled news ETB 17M C-XxXxX-FF CC BY NC SA Portuguese Audio Interview/debate RTP 19h C-XxXxX-FF CC BY NC SA Italian Audio Broadcast news RAI 150h C-XxXxX-FF C-XxXxX-FF Crawled news RAI 10M C-XxXxX-FF C-Xx...
Data Sharing Agreements. The Pipeline Project will require the collection of and sharing of data among the Participants to fulfill objectives of the project.
a. Service providers will provide a narrative description of tactics and processes used to recruit students, focusing on underserved populations, degree completion and job placement for the purposes of replicability.
b. Certificate completion rate and job placement of those individuals served.
c. Provide data and information to support evaluation of outcomes, and success of partner organizations to reach shared goals of increased equitable access to and completion of training to earn the credentials needed to fill jobs in Southwest Florida.
Data Sharing Agreements. Third Sector must provide DCFS with any proposed data sharing agreement it intends to enter into with any party concerning or regarding the obligations, duties and/or performance of this Ramp-Up MOU within thirty (30) days before execution of the proposed data sharing agreement. DCFS shall have the final authority to amend the scope and content of any proposed data sharing agreements.
Data Sharing Agreements. County of Yolo authorizes 2-1-1 California to enter into contracts and agreements that call for the provision of specific categories or a comprehensive listing of resources from 2-1-1 providers’ resource databases for the purpose of creating a statewide database for information and referral. County of Yolo will retain full ownership of the data but will provide through 2-1-1 California a license or agreement with the contractor to use the data for a specific purpose. County of Yolo retains the right to determine whether or not to participate in such a contract or agreement with 2-1-1 California.
