Decision Making Framework Sample Clauses

Decision Making Framework. Factors are the factors to be considered during the decision making process set forth in Section 3.1.2.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision Making Framework. 5.1 The Board and the Association have developed a decision making framework in an effort to further a good working relationship between the parties. This structure shall include a Leadership Council, which is a building level committee, and a Labor Management Committee, which is a district-wide committee. Training for these committees shall be scheduled annually or as deemed necessary by the LMC.
Decision Making Framework. Parties acknowledge and agree that this MoU establishes the following key principles to facilitate decision making on matters related to Development Support Services:  Decision making by the CEC shall be based on a simple majority vote, with each member having one (1) and no more than one (1) vote through its representative.  CEC approvals are considered those instances where a majority votes to approve a decision, and a decision is considered final once all representatives required, based on this MoU or the SOPs, to participate in the decision have voted. Subsequently, where decisions were not approved, information supporting the decision must be revised and a new vote is required. If a decision cannot be revised, the decision may be dropped or abandoned. Parties agree that members and provider(s) impacted by a decision being voted upon by a Governing Forum will be given the opportunity to submit their vote in accordance with this MoU or the SOPs, with all members regardless of impact are able to review and comment on those decisions.  Decision making by each of the subsidiary governing boards shall be based on a unanimous vote for impacted participants, unless such a vote is intended to be non-binding.  Each Governing Forum shall only conduct business if a majority of the voting membership is in attendance at the meeting, either in person or remotely.  Decisions by the Governing Forums require substantiating documentation in order to be considered valid and binding; with responsibility residing with each Party for ensuring that such documentation is maintained for decisions impacting themselves.  Decisions by members and providers related to the approval of project artifacts or acceptance of delivered requirements and contracted deliverables, outside the purview of the Governing Forums, require substantiating documentation to be considered valid and binding, with responsibility for that documentation residing with the Party who initiatives the request for approval or acceptance.  Conflicts arising from the Governing Forum’s decision-making process will be addressed according to Section 5.4.  The Consortium will make available, and require the use of, those voting mechanisms it provides in accordance with the SOPs, and each Party will provide to the PMO substantiating documentation supporting their decisions where voting mechanisms are not available from the Consortium.  CRs must be documented utilizing the tools provided by the Consortium and ap...
Decision Making Framework. Subject to the achievement of the timetable set out in this document including provision of all necessary information by the applicant and consultees, the application will be referred to the appropriate committee of the Comhairle no later than: INSERT DATE 1 Pre-application phaseFirst meeting of Steering Group - Agree arrangements for me Produce draft project plan and work programme Receipt of Proposal of Application Notice Finalise project plan and programme Liaison with consultees 12 week statutory consulation expiry Officer Attendance at Public Consultation Pre-application report to committee 0 Draft S75 Agreements EIA Processes ES screening ES scoping Prepare ES (Applicants) Application Phase Application submitted Neighbour notification, advertising and registration Statutory consulation period Review key issues and work programme (agree a realistic co Resolve key issues including issues where required Re-notification, advertisement and consulation if required Circulation of draft conditions and S75 for review Officer to prepare Committee report Committee site visit Report signed by Head of Planning Presentation to Development Management Sub Committee Pre-determination hearing Decision by full council (if required) Notification to Ministers Conclude Section 75 / Decision Issued Start Start date Finish End date ############# 23 Jan 00 20 Feb 00 19 Mar 00 16 Apr 00 14 May 00 11 Jun 00 09 Jul 00 06 Aug 00 03 Sep 00 01 Oct 00 29 Oct 00 26 Nov 00 24 Dec 00 21 Jan 01 18 Feb 01 18 Mar 01 15 Apr 01 13 May 01 10 Jun 01
Decision Making Framework. Decision-making authority and processes will be established by March 31, 2022. These processes will be part of a formal Decision-Making Agreement, developed by the CND OHT Steering Committee, with oversight by the Joint Board Committee.
Decision Making Framework 

Related to Decision Making Framework

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Finality of Decision The review by an ALJ or DAB provided for above shall not be considered to be an appeal right arising under any statutes or regulations. Consequently, the parties to this CIA agree that the DAB’s decision (or the ALJ’s decision if not appealed) shall be considered final for all purposes under this CIA.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.