Frequency of Benchmark Review Sample Clauses

Frequency of Benchmark Review. The Authority may, by written notice to the Supplier, require a Benchmark Review of any or all of the Services.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (17)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Frequency of Benchmark Review. The Customer may, by written notice to the Supplier, require a Benchmark Review of any or all of the Goods and Services. The Customer shall not be entitled to carry out a Benchmark Review during the first twelve (12) Months after the Commencement Date nor at intervals of less than six (6) Months after any previous Benchmark Review. The purpose of a Benchmark Review will be to establish whether a Benchmarked Goods and Service are and/or the Benchmarked Services as a whole are, Good Value. The Goods and Services that are to be the Benchmarked Services will be identified by the Customer and written request will be given to the Supplier under paragraph 6.1 of this Schedule. The Customer shall be entitled to publish the results of any benchmarking the Supplier shall use all reasonable endeavours and act in good faith to supply information required by the Benchmarker in order to undertake the benchmarking. The Customer shall appoint the Benchmarker to carry out the Benchmark Review. The Customer will, at the written request of the Supplier, require the Benchmarker to enter into an appropriate confidentiality undertaking with the Supplier. The costs and expenses of the Benchmarker and the Benchmark Review shall be shared equally between both Parties provided that each Party shall bear its own internal costs of the Benchmark Review. The costs of the Benchmark Review shall be borne by the Supplier if the Benchmark Review finds that the Benchmarked Services are not Good Value. The Customer shall require the Benchmarker to produce, and to send to each Party for approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review within ten (10) Working Days after the date of the appointment of the Benchmarker, or such longer period as the Benchmarker shall reasonably request in all the circumstances. The plan should include, without limitation: a proposed timetable for the Benchmark Review; a description of the information that the Benchmarker requires each party to provide; a description of the benchmarking methodology to be used; a description that demonstrates objectively and transparently that the benchmarking methodology to be used is capable of fulfilling the benchmarking objectives; an estimate of the resources required from each party to underpin the delivery of the plan; a description of how the Benchmarker will scope and identify the Comparison Group; and details of any entities which the Benchmarker proposes to include within the Comparison Group. Each Party must give notice i...
Sample 1See All (5)
Frequency of Benchmark Review. The CUSTOMER may, by written notice to the SERVICE PROVIDER, require a Benchmark Review of any or all of the Ordered IT Solutions. If the SERVICE PROVIDER refuses or fails to comply with its obligations set out in paragraph 7 of this Schedule (including implementing changes in accordance with paragraph 7.22 of this Schedule to any Benchmarked Products which are not Good Value in accordance with paragraph 7.22 of this Schedule), such refusal or failure shall entitle the CUSTOMER to terminate this Contract in accordance with Clause 10.3.5 of this Contract.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Frequency of Benchmark Review. 2.1 HSBC may, by written notice to the Supplier, require a Benchmark Review of any or all of the Services. 2.2 HSBC shall not be entitled to carry out a Benchmark Review during the six (6) month period from the Restatement Date nor at intervals of less than twelve (12) months after any previous Benchmark Review in respect of the Services in the relevant Country that were the subject of that previous Benchmark Review.
Sample 1Sample 2
Frequency of Benchmark Review. 1.1 The AUTHORITY may, at anytime during the Term, require a Benchmark Review of any or all of the available Traffic Management Technology. If the SUPPLIER refuses or fails to comply with its obligations set out in Clause 1 of this Schedule (including implementing changes in accordance with Clause 4.5 of this Schedule to any Benchmarked Products which are not good value), such refusal or failure shall entitle the AUTHORITY to: 1.1.1 cease to publish details of any or all of the SUPPLIER’s Traffic Management Technology in the Catalogue and forbidding the SUPPLIER to accept further Orders for those Traffic Management Technology without specific prior written agreement from the AUTHORITY; or 1.1.2 terminate this Framework Agreement in accordance with Clause 13 of this Framework Agreement.
Sample 1
Frequency of Benchmark Review. 2.1.1 The Authority may, at anytime during the Term, require a Benchmark Review of any or all of the Available Services. If the Supplier refuses or fails to comply with its obligations set out in paragraph 2 of this Schedule (including implementing changes in accordance with paragraph 2.4.5 of this Schedule to any Rates of Charge that have been subject to Benchmark Review or Available Services which are not Good Value), such refusal or failure shall entitle the Authority to terminate this Framework Agreement in accordance with Clause 26.14 of this Framework Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Frequency of Benchmark Review

  • Frequency of Evaluation Long form employees shall be evaluated at least one (1) time each year, which evaluation shall be completed no later than June 1.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Contract Changes Changes may not be made in the terms and conditions of this contract without the agreement and written permission of the Director of Residence Life or the Director’s designee.

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Contractor Sales Reporting Vendor Management Fee Contractor Reports Master Contract Sales Reporting. Contractor shall report total Master Contract sales quarterly to Enterprise Services, as set forth below. Master Contract Sales Reporting System. Contractor shall report quarterly Master Contract sales in Enterprise Services’ Master Contract Sales Reporting System. Enterprise Services will provide Contractor with a login password and a vendor number. The password and vendor number will be provided to the Sales Reporting Representative(s) listed on Contractor’s Bidder Profile. Data. Each sales report must identify every authorized Purchaser by name as it is known to Enterprise Services and its total combined sales amount invoiced during the reporting period (i.e., sales of an entire agency or political subdivision, not its individual subsections). The “Miscellaneous” option may be used only with prior approval by Enterprise Services. Upon request, Contractor shall provide contact information for all authorized purchasers specified herein during the term of the Master Contract. If there are no Master Contract sales during the reporting period, Contractor must report zero sales. Due dates for Master Contract Sales Reporting. Quarterly Master Contract Sales Reports must be submitted electronically by the following deadlines for all sales invoiced during the applicable calendar quarter: March 31: April 30 June 30: July 31 September 30: October 31 December 31: January 31 Vendor Management Fee. Contractor shall pay to Enterprise Services a vendor management fee (“VMF”) of 1.50 percent on the purchase price for all Master Contract sales (the purchase price is the total invoice price less applicable sales tax). The sum owed by Contractor to Enterprise Services as a result of the VMF is calculated as follows: Amount owed to Enterprise Services = Total Master Contract sales invoiced (not including sales tax) x .0150. The VMF must be rolled into Contractor’s current pricing. The VMF must not be shown as a separate line item on any invoice unless specifically requested and approved by Enterprise Services. Enterprise Services will invoice Contractor quarterly based on Master Contract sales reported by Contractor. Contractors are not to remit payment until they receive an invoice from Enterprise Services. Contractor’s VMF payment to Enterprise Services must reference this Master Contract number, work request number (if applicable), the year and quarter for which the VMF is being remitted, and the Contractor’s name as set forth in this Master Contract, if not already included on the face of the check. Failure to accurately report total net sales, to submit a timely usage report, or remit timely payment of the VMF, may be cause for Master Contract termination or the exercise of other remedies provided by law. Without limiting any other available remedies, the Parties agree that Contractor’s failure to remit to Enterprise Services timely payment of the VMF shall obligate Contractor to pay to Enterprise Services, to offset the administrative and transaction costs incurred by the State to identify, process, and collect such sums. The sum of $200.00 or twenty-five percent (25%) of the outstanding amount, whichever is greater, or the maximum allowed by law, if less. Enterprise Services reserves the right, upon thirty (30) days advance written notice, to increase, reduce, or eliminate the VMF for subsequent purchases, and reserves the right to renegotiate Master Contract pricing with Contractor when any subsequent adjustment of the VMF might justify a change in pricing. Annual Master Contract Sales Report. Upon request, Contractor shall provide to Enterprise Services a detailed annual Master Contract sales report. Such report shall include, at a minimum: Product description, part number or other Product identifier, per unit quantities sold, and Master Contract price. This report must be provided in an electronic format that can be read by compatible with MS Excel. Small Business Inclusion. Upon Request by Enterprise Services, Contractor shall provide, within thirty (30) days, an Affidavit of Amounts Paid. Such Affidavit of Amounts Paid either shall state, if applicable, that Contractor still maintains its MWBE certification or state that its subcontractor(s) still maintain(s) its/their MWBE certification(s) and specify the amounts paid to each certified MWBE subcontractor under this Master Contract. Contractor shall maintain records supporting the Affidavit of Amounts Paid in accordance with this Master Contract’s records retention requirements.

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 7.1 The performance of the Employee in relation to his performance agreement shall be reviewed for the following quarters with the understanding that the reviews in the first and the third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • Frequency Your milk must be supplied on a consistent basis throughout the week on either a daily or skip-a-day basis as agreed by you and DFMC, except in emergencies. DFMC has no obligation to collect your milk more frequently than once per day, but may agree to do so from time to time. If, at DFMC’s election, your milk is collected more frequently than you require, no Gate Fees or charges will apply for the additional collections.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!