Governance Interfaces Sample Clauses

Governance Interfaces. A key component of Service Provider’s management approach for this contract is to establish a true partnership between HPES and DIR thereby providing full transparency to Service Provider’s processes and reports. This is intended to enable DIR to be in full control and completely informed of all activities at all times. Service Provider will leverage its repository of best practices for governance to establish a structure for DIR with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Service Provider’s team will inform, advise, and recommend innovative ideas and will handle the daily operation of the environment. Service Provider understands the importance of the partnership between the MSI, the STC Towers, and the customers it services. Service Provider will work closely with the Chief Technology Office, Chief Security Office, Chief Operations Office, Digital Government, Chief Financial Office, and the Statewide Data Coordinator to understand and deliver this Tower successfully and to the customers’ satisfaction. Key Performance Indicators for effective governance include the following: • Integration into the MSI process construct. • Enhance cross-organizational and functional lines of communication. • Contribute value through collaborative development of business initiatives. • Provide clear lines of responsibility and accountability for delivering services. • Support the innovation management process. To achieve DIR objectives, Service Provider will align its service team and governance committees with DIR leaders. As DIR objectives change, Service Provider will recommend new ways to meet those objectives.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Governance Interfaces. Service Provider has participated in activities associated with the DCS Owner-Operator Governance model employed by DIR with its STC customers and MSI. The owner-operator model puts the decision making and solution ownership with those individuals closest to day-to-day operations. This leads to efficiency by having decision making where there is the most functional and technical expertise. The owner-operator model shall focus on the best interest of the whole. The benefits of this approach include the following: • Better decisions. By including the input of all stakeholders, the resulting proposals can best address all potential concerns. • Better implementation. A process that includes and respects all parties and generates as much agreement as possible sets the stage for greater cooperation in implementing the resulting decisions. • Better group relationships. A cooperative, collaborative group atmosphere fosters greater group cohesion and interpersonal connection. This model converges organizational goals, objectives, and working leadership with the expertise in the functional and technical application areas. Understanding this connection is critical in demonstrating the importance of every role in the governance team in order to ensure success. Governance is a critical success factor because it helps to effectively and efficiently adapt applications and technology to the changing needs of organizations and determines allocation of resources necessary to achieve desired results. Governance establishes a basic framework: it creates the operational framework to manage change, assess performance against a set of best practices, and track progress over time. The ability to manage and measure work through governance is critical to short-term and long-term success. Another critical success factor is to have a shared understanding of the governance model as it establishes the framework in which all entities or parties must operate. The owner-operator based consensus model is meant to provide that shared understanding and framework through conveying committee structure, RACI matrices, participation, and defined and repeatable processes. The governance model sets the framework for short-term and long-term planning, service delivery plan development and execution, status, risk, issue, and change management. This is important for providing team members at all levels one shared process to use, critical to achieving the goals, developing and managing performance met...

Related to Governance Interfaces

  • Governance Structure The Academy shall be organized and administered as a Michigan nonprofit corporation under the direction of the Academy Board and pursuant to the governance structure as set forth in the Bylaws. The Academy’s Board of Directors shall meet monthly unless another schedule is mutually agreed upon by the President and the Academy. The Academy shall not delegate this duty of organization and administration of the Academy without the express affirmative consent of the University.

  • Interface A defined set of transmission facilities that separate Load Zones and that separate the NYCA from adjacent Control Areas. Investor-Owned Transmission Owners. A Transmission Owner that is owned by private investors. At the present time these include: Central Xxxxxx Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation.

  • Interfaces Bellcore’s GR-446-CORE defines the interface between the administration system and LIDB including specific message formats. (Bellcore’s TR-NWP-000029, Section 10)

  • GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS Enforceability of the Agreement

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • Architecture The Private Improvements shall have architectural features, detailing, and design elements in accordance with the Project Schematic Drawings. All accessory screening walls or fences, if necessary, shall use similar primary material, color, and detailing as on the Private Improvements.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Maintenance Manual No later than 60 (sixty) days prior to the Project Completion Date, the Contractor shall, in consultation with the Authority’s Engineer, evolve a maintenance manual (the “Maintenance Manual”) for the regular and preventive maintenance of the Project Highway in conformity with the Specifications and Standards, safety requirements and Good Industry Practice, and shall provide 5 (five) copies thereof to the Authority’s Engineer. The Authority’s Engineer shall review the Maintenance Manual within 15 (fifteen) days of its receipt and communicate its comments to the Contractor for necessary modifications, if any.

  • Analytics 1.1. IFS may track and analyze the usage of the IFS Offering for purposes of determining usage made of the IFS Offering, for the purposes of security, to assist customers, and for improving the Software and Services and the user experience in using such Software and Services. For example, IFS may use this information to help customers derive more value from the Software and Services, to understand and analyze trends, or to track which features are used most often in order to improve the Software and Services. IFS may share anonymous usage data with its service providers for the purpose of helping in such tracking, analysis and improvements. Additionally, IFS may share such anonymous usage data on an aggregate basis in the normal course of operating their business; for example, IFS may share information publicly to show trends about the general use of its software and services. TERMS - SERVICES

  • Governance of School 2.1. The School's Governing Board is the independent board of the School that is responsible for the financial, organizational, and academic viability of the School; possesses the independent authority to determine the organization and management of the School, the curriculum, and the instructional methods; has the power to negotiate supplemental collective bargaining agreements with exclusive representatives of their employees and is considered the employer of School employees for purposes of chapters 76, 78 and 89; and ensures compliance with applicable laws.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!