High Performance Work Systems Sample Clauses

High Performance Work Systems. The Employer and the Union agree to establish a joint committee to study ways in which the current classification system can be amended for purposes of enhancing employee opportunity and flexibility through the use of concepts such as broadbanding, skill based pay, and similar systems associated with high performance workplaces. The committee shall consist of four persons designated by each party and the state employee members will serve without loss of pay or travel expenses, exclusive of overtime. The committee will include in its work a study of the relationship between workforce development and high performance systems, including training requirements, career development paths, workplace redesign and the impact of existing provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, and may recommend the implementation of pilot programs within the context of this Section. The parties agree that, except as may be mutually agreed otherwise, no pilot or project initiated as result of this effort will conflict with, amend or abridge any provision of this Agreement. It is further agreed that no pilot or project initiated as a result of this effort will result in loss of pay or benefits, nor shall it result in the layoff of any employee. The joint committee will issue its report and recommendation by January 30, 1998.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
High Performance Work Systems. The Employer and the Union agree to maintain a joint committee to continue to examine issues raised in the joint report on high performance work systems and alternative compensation systems issued 3/13/98. The committee shall consist of up to five (5) representatives designated by the Union and the Office of Collective Bargaining. The state employee members will serve without loss of pay or travel expenses, exclusive of overtime. The committee will include in its work consideration of ways that the recommendations contained in the report can be implemented as set out in pages 6-11. The parties agree that, except as may be mutually agreed otherwise, no pilot or project initiated as a result of this effort will conflict with, amend or abridge any provision of this Agreement. It is further agreed that no pilot or project initiated as a result of this effort will result in loss of pay or benefits, nor shall it result in the layoff of any employee.
High Performance Work Systems. The Employer and the Union agree to establish a joint committee to study ways in which the current classification system can be amended for purposes of enhancing employee opportunity and flexibility through the use of concepts such as broad-banding, skill based pay, and similar systems associated with high performance workplaces. The committee shall consist of four (4) persons designated by each party and the state employee members will serve without loss of pay or travel expenses, exclusive of overtime. The committee will include in its work a study of the relationship between workforce development and high performance systems, including training, requirements, career development paths, workplace redesign and the impact of existing provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, and shall recommend the implementation of pilot programs within the context of this Section. The Committee shall make its recommendation no later than March 31, 1998.
High Performance Work Systems. The Employer and the Union agree to explore the development of maintain a joint committee to continue to examine issues raised in the joint report on high performance work systems. and alternative compensation systems issued 3/13/98. The committee shall consist of up to five (5) representatives designated by the Union and the Office of Collective Bargaining. The state employee members will serve without loss of pay or travel expenses, exclusive of overtime. The Employer and the Union may mutually agree to jointly develop or revise work processes, establish measured alternative compensation systems, implement flatter organizational structures, implement flexible scheduling methods and/or consider other initiatives that may contribute to more efficient and effective delivery of state government services. Such agreements must be executed by the Director of the Office of Collective Bargaining, and the President and Executive Director of OCSEA. The Employer and the Union may mutually agree to develop local agency joint training initiatives such as work redesign and compensation methods in order to provide committee members with the knowledge and skills necessary to achieve committee goals and objectives. The committee will include in its work consideration of ways that the recommendations contained in the report can be implemented as set out in pages 6-

Related to High Performance Work Systems

  • Registry Performance Specifications Registry Performance Specifications for operation of the TLD will be as set forth in Specification 10 attached hereto (“Specification 10”). Registry Operator shall comply with such Performance Specifications and, for a period of at least one (1) year, shall keep technical and operational records sufficient to evidence compliance with such specifications for each calendar year during the Term.

  • Software Performance HP warrants that its branded software products will conform materially to their specifications and be free of malware at the time of delivery. HP warranties for software products will begin on the date of delivery and unless otherwise specified in Supporting Material, will last for ninety (90) days. HP does not warrant that the operation of software products will be uninterrupted or error-free or that software products will operate in hardware and software combinations other than as authorized by HP in Supporting Material.

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Hardware and Software Requirements In order to access and retain Disclosures electronically, you must satisfy the following computer hardware and software requirements: access to the Internet; an email account and related software capable of receiving email through the Internet; a web browser which is SSL-compliant and supports secure sessions, and hardware capable of running this software.

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions:

  • Acceptance/Performance Test 4.7.1 Prior to synchronization of the Power Project, the SPD shall be required to get the Project certified for the requisite acceptance/performance test as may be laid down by Central Electricity Authority or an agency identified by the central government to carry out testing and certification for the solar power projects.

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!