Interrogations. The SRO will not be involved in questioning of students initiated and conducted by school personnel in disciplinary matters unless requested by the school personnel to maintain a safe and secure school environment. If the SRO’s presence is requested under these circumstances, the SRO shall confine his or her involvement to what is reasonably necessary to protect the safety and security of members of the school community and shall not lead the investigation or actively question students.
Interrogations. In cases where the parent(s) or guardian cannot be reached and any questioning of a student is conducted without parental notification, the school principal or designee must be present during the questioning unless the SRO directs otherwise for safety or investigative reasons. Presence of the principal/designee does not in any way impact the SRO’s duty, if applicable in the situation, to comply with the student’s Miranda or juvenile Miranda rights. At no time shall the SRO request that any WCPSS employee act as an agent of the SRO or law enforcement in any interrogation.
Interrogations. No officer or employee of the United States may interrogate or be present during the in- terrogation of any United States person ar- rested in any foreign country with respect to narcotics control efforts without the written consent of such person.
Interrogations. The Sheriff will ensure that all interrogations conducted by EPSO employees occur in accordance with the Constitution and laws of the United States.
Interrogations. SROs may be present during the questioning of a student by school faculty. SROs may participate in the questioning of a student about conduct that could result in criminal charges only after informing the student of their Miranda rights in age-appropriate language and informing the student’s parent(s) or guardian(s). Parents/guardians should be allowed sufficient time to arrive at school to be present for interrogation.
Interrogations. 1. In cases where the parent(s) or guardian cannot be reached and any questioning of a student is conducted without parental notification, the school principal or designee must be present during the questioning unless the SRO directs otherwise for safety or investigative reasons.
2. Presence of the principal/designee does not in any way impact the SRO’s duty, if applicable in the situation, to comply with the student’s Xxxxxxx or juvenile Miranda rights.
3. At no time shall the SRO request that any Thomasville City School District employee act as an agent of the SRO or law enforcement in any interrogation.
4. The SRO will not be involved in questioning of students initiated and conducted by school personnel in disciplinary matters unless requested by the school personnel to maintain a safe and secure school environment.
a) If the SRO’s presence is requested under these circumstances, the SRO shall confine his or her involvement to what is reasonably necessary to protect the safety and security of members of the school community and shall not lead the investigation or actively question students.
Interrogations. A. The interrogation of an officer shall be scheduled at a reasonable time, preferably while the officer is on duty, or if feasible, during daylight hours.
(1) Anytime that an officer is requested to respond to a non- criminal inquiry, any facts the officer furnishes as a result of being compelled to respond to an official department inquiry shall not be used against the officer in whole, in part, or in total, as evidence supporting a sworn affidavit without independent corroboration of the facts contained therein. This shall not apply to intentional misrepresentation or omission of the facts, or admissions of criminal conduct. In the event that the Department is relying on independent corroborative evidence in lieu of a sworn affidavit, the type of corroborative evidence must be identified on the Complaint Against Department Member form (ISP 3-23). Furthermore, the document (ISP 3-23) must be signed by a sworn officer who is accountable to the Rules of Conduct. The types of evidence the Department must review and may rely upon will be dependent upon the type of case, but may include arrest and case reports, medical records, statement of witnesses and complainants, video and audio tapes, and photographs. The list is illustrative only and is not to be considered exclusive or exhaustive.
(2) No officer will be required to participate in an Administrative Interview to answer any allegation of misconduct unless it is supported by an affidavit, except as specified in Section 3 of this Article, or a properly prepared form ISP 3-23 as described in sub-section 1. In the event that no affidavit is received within a reasonable time, the investigation will be terminated and the case closed.
(3) Nothing in section 2 of this Article shall prohibit the Lodge from enforcing the rights afforded to it under Article 8 of this agreement.
B. The interrogation, depending upon the allegation, will normally take place at a Department facility, or other convenient appropriate location.
C. Prior to the interrogation, and not less than twenty-four (24) hours when practicable, the officer who will be interrogated will be informed in writing of:
(1) the identity of the officer conducting the interrogation;
(2) the identity of all persons present during the interrogation;
(3) the nature of the complaint and pertinent facts alleged;
(4) the names of the complainants known at the time of the interrogation;
(5) his statutory administrative proceedings rights if the allegation under inves...
Interrogations. A. The interrogation of an officer shall be scheduled at a reasonable time, preferably while the officer is on duty, or if feasible, during daylight hours.
(1) Anytime that an officer is requested to respond to a non-criminal inquiry, any facts the officer furnishes as a result of being compelled to respond to an official Department inquiry, excluding the initial fact finding memorandum, shall not be used against the officer in whole, in part, or in total, as evidence supporting a sworn affidavit without independent corroboration of the facts contained therein. This shall not apply to intentional misrepresentation or omission of the facts, or admissions of criminal conduct. In the event that the Department is relying on independent corroborative evidence in lieu of a sworn affidavit, the type of corroborative evidence must be identified on the Complaint against Department Member form (ISP 3-23). Furthermore, the document (ISP 3-23) must be signed by a sworn officer who is accountable to the Rules of Conduct. The types of evidence the Department must review and may rely upon will be dependent upon the type of case, but may include arrest and case reports, medical records, statement of witnesses and complainants, video and audio tapes, and photographs. The list is illustrative only and is not to be considered exclusive or exhaustive.
(2) No officer will be required to participate in an Administrative Interview to answer any allegation of misconduct unless it is supported by an affidavit, except as specified in sub-section I, J, or K, of this section, or a properly prepared form ISP 3-23 as described in sub-section 1. In the event that no affidavit is received within a reasonable time, the investigation will be terminated and the case closed.
(3) Nothing in section 2 of this Article shall prohibit the Lodge from enforcing the rights afforded to it under Article 8 of this agreement.
B. The interrogation, depending upon the allegation, will normally take place at a Department facility, or other convenient appropriate location.
C. Prior to the interrogation, and not less than twenty-four (24) hours when practicable, the officer who will be interrogated will be informed in writing of:
(1) the identity of the officer conducting the interrogation;
(2) the identity of all persons present during the interrogation;
(3) the nature of the complaint and pertinent facts alleged;
(4) the names of the complainants known at the time of the interrogation;
(5) his statutory ad...
Interrogations. Any officer who is being interrogated under circumstances where the officer could be subject to discipline shall have a right to have a PBA representative present. It is the employee’s responsibility to notify the PBA of the request for union representation.
Interrogations. In cases where the parent(s) or guardian cannot be reached and any questioning of a student is conducted without parental notification, the school principal
