Liquefaction. Clearance granted 11/29/10 (part of coastal use permit) Coastal Use Permit Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR) P20101481 Construction in coastal management zone • Solicitation of Views • Same as for USACOE permit, and additional information on CY of disturbance in all land types. NTP or as specified in FERC Authorization Liquefaction: Received 03/28/11 PERMIT OR APPROVAL REGULATORY REFERENCE RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REGULATED ACTIVITY TECHNICAL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR APPLICATION DATE REQUIRED COMMENTS Historic Preservation Approval - Section 106 Environmental Review (applies to entire site) Louisiana Division of Historic Preservation (LDHP) Federal oversight requires compliance with Section 106 • Phase I Survey Report • Unanticipated Discoveries Plan review • Dredged Material Placement Area Plan review • Updated Unanticipated Discoveries Plan • Final Phase I Survey Report (terminal and pipeline combined) • Consultation for approval of revised construction dock NTP or as specified in FERC Authorization Phase I: Final Approval 01/12/05 Phase II: Final Approval 07/16/05 Liquefaction Clearance granted 07/02/10 Traffic data for SH82 NEPA/FERC Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development request for traffic information for XX 00 XXX or as specified in FERC Authorization No permit required; informational purposes only. Permit for Construction in a Zone “VE” or Variance as: functionality dependent use, Floodplain Development Permit Cameron Parish Floodplain Administrator Construction of facilities and buildings • Submit Individual Permit application package • Indemnification and Roadway Easement permits/approvals NTP or as specified in FERC Authorization Permit for new buildings in Liquefaction Occupancy authorization for buildings Office of the State Fire Xxxxxxxx Occupancy authorization for buildings Submittal of building plans, fire suppression diagrams, and facility inspection. Prior to occupancy Permit for new buildings in Liquefaction Letter Order Authorizing Start-up of Liquefaction Train U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) LNG Facility Environmental Resource Reports 1-13 submitted with FERC Application and subsequent environmental info requests. Prior to Start-up Liquefaction: Execution Version ATTACHMENT R FORM OF IRREVOCABLE, STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT [to be issued on letterhead of Issuing Bank] IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. DATE: [ ] AMOUNT OF: U.S.$ 376,900,000 BENEFICIARY: APPLICANT AND ACCOUNT PARTY: SABINE PAS...
Liquefaction. (d) A detailed description of the pro- posed transportation operation, includ- ing—
Liquefaction. 4.1.8.3 P4K - Tie In Sketches 25829-200-P4K-18-00001 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-20-00001 00B Piping 335R05 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-20-00002 00B Piping 335R05 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-20-00003 00B Piping 335R05 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-20-00004 00B Piping 325J01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-24-00001 00B Piping 301R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-33-00001 00B Piping 335U04 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-33-00002 00B Piping 321U01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-33-00003 00B Piping 321U01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-33-00004 00B Piping 335U04 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-35-00001 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-35-00002 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-36-00001 00B Piping 335F01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-39-00001 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-54-00001 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-54-00002 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-11-00001 00B Piping 335R05 Tie-In Location 25829-200-P4K-55-00001 00B Piping 326R01 Tie-In Location
Liquefaction. Areas having layers of water-saturated loose fine sand or silt typically deposited in the past years can temporally loose their strength and behave as a viscous fluid due to severe ground shaking. Structures founded on such deposits settle, tilt or rip apart (Japan) as the soil spreads laterally. structures may float up. Ground shaking can cause lateral movements on the top of liquefied surface layers. Such large subsoil deformations usually interrupt service lines (water supply, sewer, gas or electricity). Due to soil liquefaction the port facilities of Kobe for instance were out of service for several months due to the February 1995 earthquake. In the harbour area the entire watersystem went out of service due to liquefaction, induced excessive subsoil deformations, and hindering also fire fighting activities.
Liquefaction resistance is also typically expressed in terms of a cyclic stress ratio, although that ratio is now commonly referred to as the cyclic resistance ratio, CRR. The cyclic resistance ratio is defined as the cyclic stress ratio that just causes initial liquefaction. The cyclic resistance ratio is typically determined as a function of two parameters – penetration resistance and earthquake magnitude. Number of Cycles, N 15 0 Magnitude, M Figure 2.1 Variation of number of equivalent cycles with earthquake magnitude As indicated previously, early procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential determined liquefaction resistance from the results of laboratory tests. Subsequent investigations showed that laboratory test results were significantly influenced by a number of factors, such as soil fabric, that could not be reliably replicated in laboratory test specimens. As a result, it is now most common to relate cyclic resistance ratio to corrected Standard Penetration Test resistance, i.e., (N1)60. Xxxx and Xxxxxx (1997) recently proposed a graphical relationship between CRR and (N1)60 (Figure 2.2). This graphical relationship is appropriate for M7.5 earthquakes – correction factors for other earthquake magnitudes have been proposed by various researchers (Figure 2.3).
Liquefaction. Liquefaction is the rapid transformation of saturated, loose, fine-grained sediment to a fluidlike state and is typically caused by strong ground shaking during an earthquake. Liquefaction can result in substantial loss of life, injury, and damage to property. In addition, liquefaction increases the hazard of fires because of explosions induced when underground gas lines break, and because the breakage of water mains substantially reduces fire suppression capability. The potential for liquefaction to occur depends on both the susceptibility of near-surface deposits to liquefaction, and the likelihood that ground motions will exceed a specified threshold level. Because many portions of the Planning Area are situated in the vicinity of an active fault, the immediate area surrounding the earthquake epicenter will be exposed to strong ground shaking should a large earthquake occur. Areas most susceptible to liquefaction are underlain by loose granular sediments and low-lying lands adjacent to creeks and estuaries. According to the Safety Element, site-specific geologic hazard assessments, conducted by a licensed geologist, shall be completed prior to development approval in areas with liquefaction hazards as indicated in the Public Record.
Liquefaction. The City defines four potential earthquake shaking damage zone designated as Seismic Zones I through IV. Zone I represents areas with the least potential for shaking damage relative to the other areas and Zone IV represents areas with the greatest potential for seismic-shaking damage. The zones are partially defined by the type of soil (silt, sand or clay) that underlies the area, this classification scheme does not mean that Zone IV areas are necessarily at significantly greater risk than Zone I areas. The entire City is subject to a moderately high potential for damage resulting from a significant earthquake. Even so, Seismic Zones IIb through IV have a potential for localized liquefaction. Liquefaction is a rare loss of ground strength that can occur when water-saturated, granular soils (sand for example) are shaken in a significant earthquake. Seismic Zone I represents alluvial fan deposits (sediments deposited where streams exit at the base of hills) consisting of unconsolidated silt, sands clays and gravels. Seismic Zones IIa and IIb represent fluvial (river or stream) deposits consisting of unconsolidated silt, sands, and clay. Liquefaction is possible in localized areas of zone IIb. Seismic Zone III represents inter-fluvial basin deposits (sediments deposited in areas between rivers or streams) consisting of highly plastic, organic- xxxx xxxx and silt. These deposits are locally subject to liquefaction and differential settlement. Seismic Zone IV represents marshland and coastal flood plain areas underlain by Bay mud. These areas are subject to strong shaking, liquefaction, and differential settlement.
Liquefaction. Revision/refinement of the multilinear regression (MLR) equations currently used for determining horizontal ground displacement generated by liquefaction-induced lateral spread (Bartlett and Youd, 1992; Youd and others, 1999), using an updated dataset. Application of the revised MLR equations in probabilistic mapping of liquefaction-induced ground failure in Utah County, Utah, a Wasatch Front region of high population growth and extensive infrastructure vulnerable to significant damage from earthquake-induced liquefaction. Utah Earthquake Research Priorities for 2015 The 2014 Utah Earthquake Working Groups and the Utah Geological Survey defined priorities for earthquake research in Utah in 2015, provided for consideration in responding to the U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program (EHP) Request for Proposals (xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxx/). Faults Studies of faults should focus on those structures that have been identified as a priority by the 2014 Utah Quaternary Fault Parameters Working Group listed below: Highest Priority (not in order of priority) o Acquire new paleoseismic information for the five central segments of the Wasatch fault zone to address data gaps – e.g., (a) the rupture extent of earthquakes on the Brigham City and Salt Lake City segments, (b) long-term earthquake records for the northern Provo, southern Weber, and Salt Lake City segments, and (c) the subsurface geometry and connection of the Warm Springs and East Bench faults on the Salt Lake City segment. o Acquire long-term earthquake record for the West Valley fault zone – Taylorsville fault. o Improve the long-term earthquake record for Cache Valley (East and West Cache fault zones). o Use recently acquired LiDAR data to more accurately map the traces of the Wasatch, West Valley, and Hurricane fault zones, and search for and map as appropriate previously undiscovered mid-valley Quaternary faults.
Liquefaction. As the Utah Liquefaction Advisory Group (ULAG) did not meet in 2014, we have listed the priorities defined in the 2013 ULAG meeting. o Revision/refinement of the multilinear regression (MLR) equations currently used for determining horizontal ground displacement generated by liquefaction-induced lateral spread (Bartlett and Youd, 1992; Youd and others, 1999), using an updated dataset.
Liquefaction. APA’s obligations under clause 5.1 to instruct liquefaction of Gas and to allocate LNG are subject to the Shipper:
