Officer Evaluation Sample Clauses

Officer Evaluation. Each of a candidate’s superior officers shall assign points based on his/her assessment of each candidate’s qualifications and abilities to perform the duties of Fire Captain. The criteria used in assigning officer evaluation points, shall be disclosed to all candidates prior to assigning points, shall be job-related and applied uniformly to all candidates. Each officer shall keep and maintain records of all scores for the duration of the Final Promotion List.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Officer Evaluation. The Superintendent or designee, in conjunction with the Lieutenant of Police, will provide a performance evaluation of the SRO. The evaluation will be completed twice during the school year.
Sample 1Sample 2
Officer Evaluation. Each candidate for the rank of Captain shall be evaluated by a panel of current active Carbondale Fire Department Officers, consisting of Assistant Fire Chiefs and Captains (whom have held the rank of Captain for a minimum of six (6) months at the time of the evaluation. The Officer Evaluation for Captain shall be based on the following job-related qualities of an effective leader:
Sample 1
Officer Evaluation. Each candidate for the rank of Lieutenant shall be evaluated by a separate panel of seven (7) active Palatine Fire Department officers of higher rank than the candidate, consisting of the following:
Sample 1
Officer Evaluation. The High School Principal or designee may provide a performance evaluation of the PSLO to the Lieutenant of Police. The evaluation will be completed twice during the school year; once at the end of the fall semester, and once at the end of the spring semester. The performance evaluation will conform to Department Policy. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the Police Department expects the District to promptly notify the Chief of Police or designee of the facts involving any performance- related problem involving any member of the City of Verona Police Department.
Sample 1
Officer Evaluation. The High School Principal or designee, in conjunction with the Lieutenant of Police or designee, will provide a performance evaluation of the PSLO. The evaluation will be completed twice during the school year; once at the end of the fall semester, and once at the end of the spring semester. The performance evaluation will conform to department Policy 35.1, Performance Evaluations.
Sample 1

Related to Officer Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!