PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS Sample Clauses

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS a) The appraisal of experienced teachers shall be conducted in accordance with the Education Act, Regulations and the Board’s Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers Document dated November 2007 as may be amended from time to time in consultation with the Bargaining Unit. b) No member of the bargaining unit shall participate in the Teacher Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teacher process of another member. c) Upon receipt of the Summative Report Form of a Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers, the teacher may add comments to it, sign it (with the express understanding that such signature is only an acknowledgement of having received a copy thereof) and return it to the Principal for placement in the teacher’s personnel file at the Board office. Any such comments are to be returned by the teacher within six (6) working days. The timeline identified herein may be extended by mutual consent in the event that a teacher has received an unsatisfactory rating. d) Unless otherwise directed by the teacher, notification of an unsatisfactory rating under the Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teacher process shall be provided to the President of the Bargaining Unit. e) The Board shall provide a list annually to the President of the Bargaining Unit by no later than the thirtieth (30th) instructional day of the school year identifying the names of the teachers who have been designated to participate in the Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers process in that school year. f) A teachers Annual Learning Plan (ALP) is authored and directed by the teacher and is developed in a consultative manner with the principal. Consultation and collaboration related to the ALP shall occur as defined by the Ministry of Education.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS. 19.01 a) The appraisal of experienced teachers shall be conducted in accordance with the Education Act, Regulations and the Board's Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers Document dated November 2007 and the Teacher Performance Appraisal (Technical Requirements Manual2010).
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS. 16.01 The appraisal of experienced teachers shall be conducted in accordance with the Education Act, Regulations the Performance of Experienced Teachers Technical Requirements Manual (Revised 2010) and the Board’s Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers Document dated November 2007 as may be amended from time to time in consultation with the Bargaining Unit. a) No member of the bargaining unit shall participate in the Teacher Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teacher process of another member. b) Upon receipt of the Summative Report Form of a Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers, the teacher may add comments to it, sign it (with the express understanding that such signature is only an acknowledgement of having received a copy thereof) and return it to the Principal for placement in the teacher’s personnel file at the Board office. Any such comments are to be returned by the teacher within six (6) working days. The timeline identified herein may be extended by mutual consent in the event that a teacher has received an unsatisfactory rating. c) Unless otherwise directed by the teacher, notification of an unsatisfactory rating under the Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teacher process shall be provided to the President of the Bargaining Unit within five (5) working days of the teacher having received the unsatisfactory. d) The Board shall provide a list annually to the President of the Bargaining Unit by no later than the thirtieth (30th) instructional day of the school year identifying the names of the teachers who have been designated to participate in the Performance Appraisal of Experienced Teachers process in that school year. e) A teacher’s Annual Learning Plan (ALP) is authored and directed by the teacher and is developed in a consultative manner with the principal. Consultation and collaboration related to the ALP shall occur as defined by the Ministry of Education.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS a) No member of the Bargaining Unit shall participate in the performance appraisal of another member of the Bargaining Unit. b) Unless mutually agreed by the teacher being appraised and by the principal, vice-principal or supervisory officer conducting the performance appraisal, voluntary activities shall not be a part of the performance appraisal process. c) The criteria used in the performance appraisal process for experienced teachers shall be as set out in the (2007) Ministry of Education document Performance Appraisal for Experienced Teachers: Technical Requirements Manual and the (2003) Institute for Catholic Education document Teacher Performance Appraisal. d) On or about October 15th the Board shall provide the Bargaining Unit with a list of the names of the teachers in each school under the Board’s jurisdiction who are scheduled for evaluation in that school year. e) If a principal, vice-principal or supervisory officer conducting a performance appraisal on a teacher determines that the rating is unsatisfactory, the Board shall inform the President of the Bargaining Unit of the name of the teacher within fifteen (15) school days of the determination. f) In the event that the Ministry of Education changes the process of Performance Appraisal for Experienced Teachers the Parties agree to meet to examine the changes and to make recommendations regarding the implementation of the said changes.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS. The performance appraisal of experienced teachers shall be conducted in accordance with the Education Act and Regulations. It is understood that the following concepts will be incorporated into the implementation of all teacher performance appraisals:  to xxxxxx, support and recognize excellence in teaching  to promote the professional growth of teachers  to identify the professional strengths of teachers and areas for possible development and review  to enhance the classroom learning environment It is further understood:  no member of the Bargaining Unit shall participate in the performance appraisal of another member  that the Bargaining Unit shall be provided with the names of teachers who are on the performance appraisal cycle by October 31st each year  that the Board will notify the President of the Bargaining Unit within ten (10) working days of any teacher receiving an unsatisfactory ratingvoluntary activities shall not be evaluated within the context of the Teacher Performance  Appraisal process.

Related to PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EXPERIENCED TEACHERS

  • Independent Expert The Parties and the other signatories may, upon written agreement, resort to an independent expert in order to obtain a well-grounded opinion that may lead to the settlement of the dispute or controversy. In case such agreement is signed, arbitration may only be filed after issuance of the expert’s opinion.

  • Performance Appraisal The employee's performance will be rated by his/her immediate excluded supervisor. The rater shall discuss the performance appraisal with the employee. The employee shall have the opportunity to provide his/her comments to be attached to the performance appraisal. The employee shall sign the performance appraisal and that signature shall only indicate that the employee has read the performance appraisal. A copy shall be provided the employee at this time.

  • Selection of Reviewing Party; Change in Control If there has not been a Change in Control, any Reviewing Party shall be selected by the Board of Directors, and if there has been such a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a majority of the Company's Board of Directors who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control), any Reviewing Party with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to indemnification of Expenses under this Agreement or any other agreement or under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws as now or hereafter in effect, or under any other applicable law, if desired by Indemnitee, shall be Independent Legal Counsel selected by Indemnitee and approved by the Company (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld). Such counsel, among other things, shall render its written opinion to the Company and Indemnitee as to whether and to what extent Indemnitee would be entitled to be indemnified hereunder under applicable law and the Company agrees to abide by such opinion. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Legal Counsel referred to above and to indemnify fully such counsel against any and all expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be required to pay Expenses of more than one Independent Legal Counsel in connection with all matters concerning a single Indemnitee, and such Independent Legal Counsel shall be the Independent Legal Counsel for any or all other Indemnitees unless (i) the employment of separate counsel by one or more Indemnitees has been previously authorized by the Company in writing, or (ii) an Indemnitee shall have provided to the Company a written statement that such Indemnitee has reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between such Indemnitee and the other Indemnitees with respect to the matters arising under this Agreement.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Performance Appraisals 3201 The Employer shall complete a written appraisal of a nurse's performance at least bi-annually. Upon request, the nurse shall be given an exact copy of the appraisal. 3202 The nurse shall have an opportunity to read such document. 3203 The nurse's signature on such document merely signifies that the contents of the document have been read. 3204 If the nurse disputes the appraisal, she/he may file a reply to the document in accordance with Article 29, and/or she/he may file a grievance under Article 12 of this Agreement.

  • Expert Determination If a Dispute relates to any aspect of the technology underlying the provision of the Goods and/or Services or otherwise relates to a financial technical or other aspect of a technical nature (as the Parties may agree) and the Dispute has not been resolved by discussion or mediation, then either Party may request (which request will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) by written notice to the other that the Dispute is referred to an Expert for determination. The Expert shall be appointed by agreement in writing between the Parties, but in the event of a failure to agree within ten (10) Working Days, or if the person appointed is unable or unwilling to act, the Expert shall be appointed on the instructions of the relevant professional body. The Expert shall act on the following basis: he/she shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator and shall act fairly and impartially; the Expert's determination shall (in the absence of a material failure to follow the agreed procedures) be final and binding on the Parties; the Expert shall decide the procedure to be followed in the determination and shall be requested to make his/her determination within thirty (30) Working Days of his appointment or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter and the Parties shall assist and provide the documentation that the Expert requires for the purpose of the determination; any amount payable by one Party to another as a result of the Expert's determination shall be due and payable within twenty (20) Working Days of the Expert's determination being notified to the Parties; the process shall be conducted in private and shall be confidential; and the Expert shall determine how and by whom the costs of the determination, including his/her fees and expenses, are to be paid.

  • Determination by Independent Firm In the event of any question arising with respect to the adjustments provided for in this Article 4 such question shall be conclusively determined by an independent firm of chartered accountants other than the Auditors, who shall have access to all necessary records of the Corporation, and such determination shall be binding upon the Corporation, the Warrant Agent, all holders and all other persons interested therein.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Independent Status The employees, volunteers, or agents of each party who are engaged in the performance of this Agreement will continue to be employees, volunteers, or agents of that party and will not for any purpose be employees, volunteers, or agents of the other party.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!