PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATIONS. Section 22.1 – Employee Performance
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATIONS. Section 22.1 Employee Performance………………………………………… 83 Section 22.2 Official Appraisal……………………………………………… 83 Section 22.3 Actions Based on Unacceptable Performance…………………. 84
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATIONS. Section 26-1. The performance management system will be administered in accordance with Army Regulation 690-400, Chapter 4302, the Total Army Performance Evaluation System (TAPES), and other applicable laws and regulations and the following. The Union and Management agree that performance standards or objectives, as applicable, allow supervisors to analyze each subordinate's performance in terms that are familiar to and understood by both. Both parties also recognize the importance of performance counseling in accordance with TAPES in the success of the evaluation process. It is further agreed that Management will:
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATIONS. Section 22.1 Employee Performance Section 22.2 Actions Based On Unacceptable Performance ARTICLE 23 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP) ARTICLE 24 OUTSOURCING AND CONTRACTING OUT ARTICLE 25 WAGE SURVEY Section 25.1 Employee Participation ARTICLE 26 LABOR/MANAGEMENT COOPERATION Section 26.1 Joint Employer-Union Sponsored Training Sessions Section 26.2 Labor/the Agency Relations (LMR) Training Section 26.3 Orientation of New Employees Section 26.4 Labor Management Partnership ARTICLE 27 POLICY LETTERS AND MEMORANDUMS AFFECTING CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AND EMPLOYEE CONDUCT Appendix A Request for Official Time Appendix B Grievance Form Appendix C NGB Form 904-1 PREAMBLE This agreement is executed between the Arkansas Army National Guard (AR ARNG), hereafter referred to as the “employer” or “Agency,”1 by and through the Adjutant General (TAG) of Arkansas, and the Laborers International Union of North America (LIUNA), hereafter referred to as the “Union,” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.” The agreement is made for all non- supervisory and non-managerial Army National Guard Technicians employed by the Arkansas Army National Guard (AR ARNG), hereafter referred to as “Technicians” or “Employees.” The Parties recognize the mutual benefits to be derived from the maintenance of a strong, progressive and professional AR ARNG that strengthens the existing bond among AR ARNG, Technicians and the community to which AR ARNG serves. The Parties also recognize that 1 When used throughout this agreement the terms “Selecting Official”, “supervisor", “Manager” or “HRO” are also generic references to the agency, or employer's representatives, and do not assign work to specific individuals. All other terms used within this agreement shall have the meaning ascribed to them as per Federal Court Decisions, United States Code, Federal Labor Relations Authority Decisions, Code of Federal Regulations, Office of Personnel the agency, National Guard Bureau Technician Personnel Regulations, or Blacks’ Law Dictionary. Whenever a dispute arises as to the meaning of a particular term, the Parties will attempt to reach agreement by referencing the sources cited above, in that specific order. cooperation encourages practices and performance that promote efficient and safe operations. The Parties to the negotiation do affirm that a successful negotiation requires modification of many traditional roles and methods to enhance an effective, efficient and responsible organization. The Pa...
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATIONS. Section 22.1 – Employee Performance The Agency’s Employee Performance and Incentive Awards Programs will be administered IAW NGB regulatory guidance.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND EVALUATIONS. 56.1: The following Rating System/Rating Levels shall be used to evaluate employees: • Needs Improvement – the employee is not performing by the Department Expectations. • Acceptable – the employee is performing by the Department Expectations. • Exceeds Expectations – Performance consistently exceeds expectations in all essential areas of responsibility, and the employee’s overall quality of work is clearly above acceptable. • Exceptional – Performance far exceeds expectations due to exceptionally high quality of work performed in all essential areas of responsibility, resulting in a superior quality of work. Employee evaluations shall be conducted as follows:
