Project Development Team. A PDT including representatives from the COUNTY, CALTRANS, and other relevant agencies shall be established within 15 days after NTP. PDT meetings shall be held monthly to resolve issues and to apprise the affected agencies of the progress of the PROJECT. A kick-off meeting with the PDT (PDT Meeting No. 1) shall be held as soon as possible after NTP. Project administration and PDT meetings shall be allotted to support completion of an environmental document and preliminary engineering.
Project Development Team. (1) Personnel composition: Developer from Qizhi software (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Yang Zuoyuan serves as leader of the team, while Li Yanfeng serves as the deputy leader.
Project Development Team. 1.3.3.1. The Parties will form a Project Development Team that will provide a forum for early and frequent consultation on issues related to Project development. Sound Transit will use the Project Development Team to facilitate participation of City transportation, engineering, utilities, land use, and other City staff as necessary in the design, analysis, environmental review, development, permitting, and construction of the Project. City representatives will meet with Sound Transit Project staff and consultants on a regular basis throughout the Project. By working with Sound Transit and its consultants on the Project Development Team, the City shall help facilitate expedited review of the Project. The City’s Designated Representative will be responsible for designated City participants in the Project Development Team and for managing the City’s participation. Exhibit C.1 identifies Sound Transit’s organizational structure and key positions of the Project Development Team and Exhibit C.2 identifies the City’s organizational structure and key positions of the Project Development Team.
Project Development Team. The City of Anaheim participated in the regular PDT meetings conducted by Xxxxxxxx and OCTA for the proposed project. The cities of Fullerton, Orange, and Placentia were also been invited to participate in PDT meetings. The PDT meetings covered a wide range of topics related to the proposed project, including development and evaluation of alternatives, engineering considerations, environmental considerations, the environmental document, and the documentation process. OCTA has a webpage (xxxxx://xxx.xx/2GMpslO) that provides information to the public regarding the proposed project, the status of the environmental document, and the environmental documentation process for the project. The public hearing (open house format) took place on December 11, 2018 from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at Rio Vista Elementary School in Anaheim. To maximize awareness and attendance of the public hearing, an extensive public communications campaign was developed and executed. The target audience included residents and business in the project study area, as well as those with professional and/or civic interests. Consistent with the spirit of Title VI, the public communications effort included outreach in Spanish, which is extensively spoken in the project area. One completed Title VI survey was received during this process. Communications and outreach methods included, but were not limited to: briefings, print and electronic notifications, and targeted community outreach. The public hearing process is further described in Section 7A. A total of approximately 54 individuals attended the meeting. Forty-four individuals signed in, but it is estimated that seven to 10 individuals did not sign in because they arrived with another person that did sign in. Among those in attendance were Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx, District Director, Office of Assemblymember Xxx Xxxx, 69th District, and Xxxx Xxxx, City of Orange Public Works, Traffic Division. The public hearing served to collect feedback from meeting participants. At the hearing, nine comment cards were submitted in writing and 12 verbal comments were received by the court reporter present at the meeting. The primary topics raised during the public hearing consisted of: • Request for sound-proof windows • Concern regarding property impacts • Request for more effective signage on freeways • Request for more information about traffic plans during construction • Request for improved access to the SR-91 Express Lanes
Project Development Team. The PDT shall be charged with the responsibility for resolving issues that arise during the development of the PROJECT when consensus cannot be reached. Issues regarding scope, cost or schedule that do not demand action for additional budget authority shall be attempted to be resolved by the PDT. The PDT will review the project issue, develop and discuss options for resolution and reach consensus on an approach. If consensus cannot be reached, the PDT will agree to elevate the issue to Level 2. Level 2 – Management. The PDT will convene a meeting of Level 2 - Management when an issue cannot be resolved by the PDT in Level 1. Level 2 Management members will include the Director of Project Development and Construction for SBCAG, and the City Engineer for the CITY. Level 3 – Executive Management. Any issue not being able to be resolved at Level 2, will be submitted for consideration at a meeting to be held by Level 3 - Executive Management members from PARTIES. Level 3 Executive Management members will include the Executive Director for SBCAG, and the Public Works Director for the CITY.
