Proportionate Share Mitigation. In the event there is not sufficient FISH Capacity available to support the students generated from the proposed residential development under review, based on the student generation multiplier (SGM) calculation of students as described in Section 13.2(d)4.a, the School Board shall entertain proportionate share mitigation options and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the local government and developer to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional FISH Capacity.
(a) When the student impacts from a proposed development cause the adopted LOS to fail, the developer’s proportionate share will be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to meet the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be calculated by the cost per student station for elementary, middle, and high school as determined and published by the State of Florida, plus a share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites as determined and published annually in the Five Year District Facilities Work Program.
(b) The methodology used to calculate a developer’s proportionate share mitigation shall be as follows: Proportionate Share = (¹Development students - Available FISH Capacity) x Total Costª per student station Where ¹Development students = Students generated by residential development that are assigned to that school ªTotal Cost = the cost per student station as determined and published by the State of Florida, plus a share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites as determined and published annually in the Five Year District Facilities Work Program.
(c) The applicant shall be allowed to enter a negotiation period with the School Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional FISH Capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a mitigation option deemed financially feasible by the School Board, the developer shall enter into a binding and enforceable agreement with the School Board and the local government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development order.
1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the impact of a residential development must be directed by the School Board toward a FISH Capacity project identified in the Five Year District Facilities Work Program. FISH Capacity projects identified within the first three (3) years of the Five Year District Faciliti...
Proportionate Share Mitigation. A developer improvement or contribution identified in a binding and enforceable agreement between the Developer, the School Board and the local government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development order to provide relief for the additional demand on public school facilities created through the residential development of the property, as set forth in Section 163.3180(6)(h).F.S.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. (a) The School Board shall consider proportionate share mitigation pursuant to provisions of this Amended Agreement. Such consideration shall be consistent with the mitigation provisions outlined herein and delineated in School Board Policy 1161, to be amended consistent with this Amended Agreement and as may be amended from time to time, regarding public school concurrency. If the proposed mitigation option is accepted and deemed financially feasible by the School Board, the applicant or Local Government shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement.
(b) The binding agreement shall be filed against the property by the property owner, reviewed and approved by the School District, and recorded in Broward County public records by the property owner. Subsequently, the recorded agreement shall be provided to the School District, Broward County and Local Government with jurisdiction over the approval of the development order.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. A developer improvement or contribution identified in a binding and enforceable agreement to satisfy the additional student impact created by proposed development containing residential units on deficient public school facilities, as set forth in Section 163.3180(13)(e), Florida Statutes, as amended.
Proportionate Share Mitigation a) In the event that there is not adequate capacity available to support a development, the School Board may entertain proportionate share mitigation options and, if accepted, shall enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the developer and the local government to mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of additional school capacity.
b) When the student impacts from a proposed development would cause the adopted Level of Service to fail, the developer’s proportionate share mitigation for the development will be based on the number of additional student stations necessary to meet the established level of service. The amount to be paid will be calculated utilizing the cost per student station allocations for elementary, middle and high school, as established by the Florida Department of Education, plus a share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites as determined and published annually in the School District’s Educational Facilities Plan (EFP)
1) The methodology used to calculate a developer’s proportionate share mitigation shall be as follows: Proportionate Share = (Development studentsª - Available Capacity) x Total Cost¹ per student station Where ªDevelopment students = Students generated by development that are assigned to that school ¹Total Cost = the cost per student station as determined and published by the State of Florida, plus a share of the land acquisition and infrastructure expenditures for school sites as determined and published annually in the School District’s EFP.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. The Local Governments, in coordination with the School Board, shall provide for mitigation alternatives that are determined by the School Board to be financially feasible and will to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standard consistent with the School Board’s District’s adopted 5-Year District Facilities Work Program.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. The Parties agree that the payment of Proportionate Share Mitigation in the total amount of $1,967,552.00 for the Development Proposal, or $936.93 per dwelling unit, is an appropriate Proportionate Share Mitigation option necessary to maintain the Level of Service Standard for school capacity in the affected Concurrency Service Area or Concurrency Service Areas. Upon the final execution of this Agreement, the School District shall issue a revised School Concurrency Determination showing adequate mitigation. The duration and effect of this School Concurrency Determination shall be in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement and the Public School Facilities Element. However, in no event shall this School Concurrency Determination, or any capacity reservation based on this Determination, continue to be effective if the Developer fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Conversely, once the Developer has completely performed its obligations under this Agreement, the Developer shall be entitled to rely on the School Concurrency Determination and capacity reservation to the extent of the capacity provided by the Proportionate Share Mitigation and once the Developer has completely performed its obligations under this Agreement, such right of reliance shall survive the expiration of this Agreement.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. The Parties agree that the payment of Proportionate Share Mitigation in the total amount of $69,312 for Phase 2 of the Development Proposal is an appropriate Proportionate Share Mitigation option for Phase 2 of the Development Proposal and is necessary to maintain the Level of Service Standard for school capacity in the affected Concurrency Service Area and/or Contiguous Concurrency Service Areas. Xxxxxxxxx and its assignees pursuant to Section 20 below shall pay to the School Board the Proportionate Share Mitigation in the form of a monetary contribution. Payment of the Proportionate Share Mitigation for Phase 2 is due in its entirety at the time of approval of final of final construction plans prior to the initiation of vertical construction of the multi-family dwelling units in Phase 2 of the Development Proposal unless the number of multi-family dwelling in Phase 2 of the Development Proposal does not exceed 219, in which case the Proportionate Share Mitigation for Phase 2 shall be reduced to $46,208, said reduction representing the Proportionate Share Mitigation for 2 elementary school student stations. The Proportionate Share Mitigation is at least proportionate to the demand for Public School Facilities to be created by the additional or new multi-family dwelling units in Phase 2 of the Development Proposal for which there is no Available School Capacity.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. The Parties agree that the payment of Proportionate Share Mitigation in the total amount of $6,439,778.68 for the Development Proposal, or $4,169.78 per single family dwelling unit, and $617.02 per multi- family dwelling unit, is an appropriate Proportionate Share Mitigation option for the Development Proposal and is necessary to maintain the Level of Service Standard for school capacity in the affected Concurrency Service Area and/or Contiguous Concurrency Service Areas. BC Holdings, and its assignees pursuant to Section 20 below, shall pay to the School Board the Proportionate Share Mitigation in the form of a monetary contribution. Payment of the Proportionate Share Mitigation for each phase of single family residential development is due on a per-unit basis ($4,169.78 per single family dwelling unit) for the number of single family residential lots shown on the approved final plat prior to the recording of the final plat for each applicable phase of the Development Proposal. Payment of the Proportionate Share Mitigation for each phase of multi-family residential development is due on a per-unit basis ($617.02 per multi-family dwelling unit) for the number of multi-family residential units shown on the approved final construction plans approved by Clay County prior to the initiation of vertical construction of the multi-family dwelling units for each applicable phase of the Development Proposal. The Proportionate Share Mitigation is at least proportionate to the demand for Public School Facilities to be created by the additional or new residential units in the Development Proposal for which there is no Available School Capacity.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. The Applicant shall
