Results of the Research. (a) All rights in any inventions or discoveries, whether or not patentable, that are developed, conceived or reduced to practice in the course of the Research or within the field of antioxidant compounds, nitrosylating compounds or related discoveries from the research laboratories of Xxxxx or Day solely by any persons, including Xxxxx or Day who work in their respective laboratories under their supervision and are students, lab employees or post-doctoral fellows ("National Jewish Employees") shall be property of National Jewish ("National Jewish Inventions"). All rights in any inventions or discoveries whether or not patentable, that are developed, conceived or reduced to practice jointly by National Jewish Employees and Sponsor employees or consultants in the course of the Research or within the field of antioxidant compounds, nitrosylating compounds or related discoveries from the research laboratories of Xxxxx or Day shall be jointly owned by National Jewish and the Sponsor ("Joint Inventions"). Title to any Joint Inventions, developments or discoveries resulting directly from the Research will be determined in accordance with U.S. Patent law, Title 35 U.S.C., in effect at the time of the invention, development or discovery. All rights in any inventions or discoveries whether or not patentable, that are developed, conceived or reduced to practice in the course of the Research solely by Sponsor employees or consultants and without the use of any National Jewish resources or facilities shall be property of the Sponsor. National Jewish shall promptly report to the Sponsor any National Jewish Inventions. Both parties agree promptly to inform the other party of any Joint Inventions. All license negotiation periods for any type of invention hereunder shall be limited to between 90 and 120 days after the option to license is exercised. For the purpose of this Section 8 only, any National Jewish Employees may not be defined as a Sponsor consultant or employee.
Results of the Research. The literature search across multiple databases yielded a total of 1,247 potentially relevant studies. After removing duplicates and conducting the initial title and abstract screening, 286 studies were identified for full-text review. Of these, 68 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis The included studies covered a diverse range of collaborative efforts between public health agencies and the food industry, spanning various levels of analysis (local, regional, national, and international) and geographical contexts. The majority of the studies (42%) focused on collaborations aimed at enhancing food safety and risk mitigation, while others explored partnerships for improving food security (22%), supply chain resilience (18%), and emergency preparedness (18%) as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Distribution of Public Health-Food Industry Collaborative Studies Table 1 Characteristics of Included Studies Characteristic Number of Studies (N=68) Level of Collaboration Local/Regional 28 National 23 International 17 Focus Area - Food Safety and Risk Mitigation 29 - Food Security 15 - Supply Chain Resilience 12 - Emergency Preparedness 12 Study Design - Systematic Review 41 - Scoping Review 17 - Narrative Review 10 The systematic reviews and meta-analyses included in this study revealed varying degrees of effectiveness for collaborative efforts in achieving their intended outcomes. Several studies highlighted positive impacts on food safety indicators, such as reduced rates of foodborne illnesses [15], while others noted improvements in supply chain transparency and traceability [16,17]. However, the definitions of topical measures were often weak, and the results indicated a need for further investigation into the outcomes of these collaborations. Qualitative data from the included studies provided insights into the factors affecting the effectiveness of collaborations between public health agencies and the food industry. Consistencies identified included robust communication systems, aligned goals and priorities, the building of trust, and an appropriate match of incentives, rewards, and resources [18,19]. Conversely, some studies highlighted issues such as cultural disparities, legal challenges, and conflicting self- interests among stakeholders [20,21].
Results of the Research. (a) All rights in any inventions or discoveries, whether or not patentable, that are developed, conceived or reduced to practice in the course of the Research solely by University employees shall be property of the University ("University Inventions"). All rights in any inventions or discoveries whether or not patentable, that are developed, conceived or reduced to practice jointly by University employees and Sponsor employees in the course of the Research shall be jointly owned by the University and the Sponsor ("Joint Inventions"). All rights in any inventions or discoveries whether or not patentable, that are developed, conceived or reduced to practice in the course of the Research solely by Sponsor employees shall be property of the Sponsor. The University shall promptly report to the Sponsor any University Inventions or Joint Inventions by University employees.
Results of the Research. Based on research results, buying and selling activities via Instagram are very difficult to fulfill the legal requirements of an agreement as stipulated in the civil law code. This has also led to many cases of law violations through Instagram. Therefore, it is necessary to apply the principle of good faith in the buying and selling process on Instagram.
Results of the Research. The results showed that Advance Purchase Agreement’s (APA) are not acceptable from the perspective of international law. The use of APA to secure prioritized access to vaccines at the expense of developing nations infringes on their right to health hence violates the principle of good faith due to being an instrument of restriction towards ability of developing nations to procure vaccines and their right to health. Furthermore, Advance Purchase Agreements, overstep the provisions of the Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health 1995 as well as the Declaration of the Right to Development adopted by the General Assembly 1986.
