Review of decisions. 65.1. An employee may request a review of a CASA decision that directly affects them. Further information is available in the CASA Review of Actions Policy
Review of decisions. 15.6.1 Where an Employee does not agree to a compulsory transfer or any of the terms of the transfer, s/he may provide, in writing, details of their concerns. The employer must discuss the concerns with the Employee and their union representative and attempt to resolve the concerns.
15.6.2 The Employee may pursue any unresolved grievance, including as to the terms of the proposed transfer or the merits of the decision to transfer him/her, through the dispute settling procedure in this Agreement. The parties will abide by any recommendation issued by the Fair Work Commission.
Review of decisions. 7.1 Applicants are entitled to request a review led by NDDC of a decision of the joint lettings panel – refer to the Council’s current Housing Register and Allocations Policy available at
8.1 Every effort will be made to enable tenants to live in their apartments for life. Tenants with a deteriorating physical or mental frailty will be able to maintain tenancy as long as care provision can be increased in line with their needs and/or additional community services can be made available.
8.2 If a tenant’s needs change to the point that they can no longer be met by a combination of the services provided at the Scheme, and those available from outside, relevant staff will discuss the situation with the tenant and or a person having legal authority to act on their behalf and work towards a mutually acceptable solution. During this review period whatever is possible will be done to continue to support the situation. Move on accommodation will only be approved with the agreement of the tenant (providing they have the capacity to make an informed decision) or a person having legal authority to act on their behalf and others involved in the care and support of the individual. SHG, the County Council, the District Council and the tenant’s Care Provider will work closely together to facilitate these processes.
Review of decisions. An employee may request a review of any CASA decision that directly affects them in accordance with procedures set out in the HR Guide.
Review of decisions. The Plan’s administrator is the MHRC. Before a Change of Control, the Plan’s administrator has complete and exclusive discretionary authority and responsibility to administer and interpret the Plan’s governing documents (including the authority to make findings of fact and to resolve ambiguities and inconsistencies in the Plan’s language, and to correct any inadvertent omissions). All decisions of the Plan’s administrator are considered to be final and controlling. Review by a court of any decision of the Plan’s administrator will be subject to the following standard of review: • Before a Change of Control, the standard of review will be the “arbitrary and capricious” standard, which means that the court will defer to the MHRC’s decision (or the decision of any successor to the MHRC), and will not overturn that decision unless the court concludes that the decision cannot be supported by the relevant facts and applicable law. • After a Change of Control, the standard of review will be “de novo,” which means that the court may overturn the MHRC’s decision (or the decision of any successor to the MHRC) if it disagrees with the decision. The MHRC has authority to delegate any of its duties and responsibilities under the Plan as it deems appropriate. In addition, the MHRC may engage one or more persons to render advice with regard to any of its administration responsibilities. Any final decision by a delegate of the MHRC will be treated for purposes of the Plan as a decision of the MHRC. Your Participation Agreement sets forth specific terms relating to your benefit under the Plan. Your Participation Agreement, including any amendment to your Participation Agreement, is valid only if it is executed on behalf of Interpublic, by Interpublic’s Vice President, Global Compensation or a member of the MHRC. Although Interpublic intends to continue the Plan indefinitely, Interpublic reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan and any Participation Agreement at any time, and from time to time, either retroactively or prospectively, without your consent. However, unless necessitated by a change in applicable law, an amendment or termination may not — • reduce the amount of your vested account balance as of the later of (a) the effective date of the amendment or termination or (b) the date the amendment or termination is adopted; or • result in a change to the form or time for paying your account balance under the Plan, unless Interpublic determines, based on the ad...
Review of decisions s. 64
(1) A person whose interests are affected by the decision may apply to the Tribunal for review of a decision by the Minister—
(a) under section 55(1) to refuse an application under section 51 or 52; or
(b) under section 55(1) to approve an application under section 51 or 52; or
(c) under section 56(1) to make a licence subject to any condition; or
(d) under section 58 to refuse an application for the renewal of a licence; or
(e) under section 58 to approve an application for the renewal of a licence; or
(f) under section 58 to impose any condition on a licence or to amend or delete any of the conditions to which a licence is subject; or
(g) under section 59(1) or (1A) to amend a licence; or
(h) under section 60(1) to revoke a licence; or
(i) under section 62(6)(a) to refuse to approve the transfer of a licence; or
(j) under section 62(6)(b) to approve the transfer of a licence; or
(k) under section 62(6)(b) to impose any condition on a licence or to amend or delete any of the conditions to which a licence is subject.
(2) An application for review must be made within 28 days after the later of—
(a) the day on which the decision is made;
(b) if, under the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, the person requests a statement of reasons for the decision, the day on which the statement of reasons is given to the person or the person is informed under section 46(5) of that Act that a statement of reasons will not be given.
Review of decisions. If a Registered Provider refuses an application, the applicant may ask for the decision to be reviewed. Applicants will be advised of their right to a review of decisions about their housing application when notified of the decision. The applicant should specify what decision they wish to be reviewed, the reason why they wish it to be reviewed and provide any additional evidence to support their case. The review should be undertaken by the Registered Provider with an alternative member of staff who was not involved in the original decision. The applicant must be advised in writing of the outcome of the review. If there is likely to be a delay in completing the review, the applicant must be advised of this in writing, with the reasons for the delay and the expected completion date of the review. Allegations that an applicant has obtained a nomination, allocation or tenancy through false information will be investigated if there is evidence to do so.
Review of decisions. See Art. 112a(1) EPC See Art. 112a(4) EPC See Art. 112a(3) EPC
Review of decisions. 42.1. Where We make a decision referred to in clause 41.1 (“the Original Decision”), You may apply to Us to review that Original Decision where You consider that We have incorrectly applied the Agreement in Your case.
42.2. You are not entitled to seek a review under clause 42.1:
a) for the purpose of reviewing the terms of the Agreement itself; or
b) to adduce new information or evidence which You were required to provide prior to the making of the Original Decision.
42.3. You must:
a) submit Your application within 10 (ten) Business Days of receipt of Our reasoning under clause 41.1 for the Original Decision; and
b) do so in writing, specifying–
i. the Original Decision You are asking Us to review, and
ii. the grounds on which You consider that it should be reviewed.
42.4. You must provide Us with any necessary assistance, explanations or further information or evidence, to enable Us to conduct the review.
42.5. Once We have undertaken the review, We may:
a) affirm the Original Decision;
b) vary the Original Decision; or
c) substitute the Original Decision with a new decision.
42.6. We will endeavour to determine the review within 10 (ten) Business Days of receipt of Your application or (if later) of receipt of any information or evidence provided under clause 42.4 and inform You as soon as practicable thereafter.
42.7. You may not seek more than one review of the substance of the Original Decision. Accordingly, Our verdict in a review shall be final.
Review of decisions. 5.1. Throughout the consultation process the Teacher Assistant may have union representation at any relevant discussions.
5.2. Where a Teacher Assistant does not agree to a compulsory transfer or any of the terms of the transfer, s/he may provide, in writing, details of their concerns. The Employer must discuss the concerns with the Teacher Assistant and their union representative and attempt to resolve the concerns.
5.3. The Teacher Assistant may pursue any unresolved grievance, including as to the terms of the proposed transfer or the merits of the decision to transfer him/her, through the dispute settling procedure in the Tasmanian Catholic Education Single Enterprise Agreement 2015 (or any successor agreement) as if it were a dispute within the terms of that clause. The parties will abide by any recommendation issued by the Fair Work Commission.
