Review of decisions. 7.1 Applicants are entitled to request a review led by NDDC of a decision of the joint lettings panel – refer to the Council’s current Housing Register and Allocations Policy available at xxx.xxxxx-xxxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxx/xxxxxx/xxxxxxx/xxxxxxx_xxxxxxxx.xxx 8 Moving On
Review of decisions. 65.1. An employee may request a review of a CASA decision that directly affects them. Further information is available in the CASA Review of Actions Policy
Review of decisions. 15.6.1 Where an Employee does not agree to a compulsory transfer or any of the terms of the transfer, s/he may provide, in writing, details of their concerns. The employer must discuss the concerns with the Employee and their union representative and attempt to resolve the concerns.
Review of decisions. An employee may request a review of any CASA decision that directly affects them in accordance with procedures set out in the HR Guide.
Review of decisions. If a Registered Provider refuses an application, the applicant may ask for the decision to be reviewed. Applicants will be advised of their right to a review of decisions about their housing application when notified of the decision. The applicant should specify what decision they wish to be reviewed, the reason why they wish it to be reviewed and provide any additional evidence to support their case. The review should be undertaken by the Registered Provider with an alternative member of staff who was not involved in the original decision. The applicant must be advised in writing of the outcome of the review. If there is likely to be a delay in completing the review, the applicant must be advised of this in writing, with the reasons for the delay and the expected completion date of the review. Allegations that an applicant has obtained a nomination, allocation or tenancy through false information will be investigated if there is evidence to do so.
Review of decisions. See Art. 112a(1) EPC See Art. 112a(4) EPC See Art. 112a(3) EPC
Review of decisions. Decisions of this committee shall be binding and not subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement, and shall not set practice or precedent.
Review of decisions. Within 60 days after receipt of a request for review, the Plan Administrative Committee shall review the initial determination. After a full and fair review considering all materials presented by the Claimant and all other pertinent materials, the Plan Administrative Committee shall render an opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth:
Review of decisions. The Plan’s administrator is the MHRC. Before a Change of Control, the Plan’s administrator has complete and exclusive discretionary authority and responsibility to administer and interpret the Plan’s governing documents (including the authority to make findings of fact and to resolve ambiguities and inconsistencies in the Plan’s language, and to correct any inadvertent omissions). All decisions of the Plan’s administrator are considered to be final and controlling. Review by a court of any decision of the Plan’s administrator will be subject to the following standard of review: • Before a Change of Control, the standard of review will be the “arbitrary and capricious” standard, which means that the court will defer to the MHRC’s decision (or the decision of any successor to the MHRC), and will not overturn that decision unless the court concludes that the decision cannot be supported by the relevant facts and applicable law. • After a Change of Control, the standard of review will be “de novo,” which means that the court may overturn the MHRC’s decision (or the decision of any successor to the MHRC) if it disagrees with the decision. The MHRC has authority to delegate any of its duties and responsibilities under the Plan as it deems appropriate. In addition, the MHRC may engage one or more persons to render advice with regard to any of its administration responsibilities. Any final decision by a delegate of the MHRC will be treated for purposes of the Plan as a decision of the MHRC. PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT, AND TERMINATION Your Participation Agreement sets forth specific terms relating to your benefit under the Plan. Your Participation Agreement, including any amendment to your Participation Agreement, is valid only if it is executed on behalf of Interpublic, by Interpublic’s Vice President, Global Compensation or a member of the MHRC. CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN Although Interpublic intends to continue the Plan indefinitely, Interpublic reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan and any Participation Agreement at any time, and from time to time, either retroactively or prospectively, without your consent. However, unless necessitated by a change in applicable law, an amendment or termination may not — • reduce the amount of your vested account balance as of the later of (a) the effective date of the amendment or termination or (b) the date the amendment or termination is adopted; or • result in a change to the form or time for paying your ...
Review of decisions. 71.1 A staff member may seek a review of decisions made in relation to their employment at the University.
