Service Evaluation Sample Clauses

Service Evaluation. 5.1 The service provided to you by Research and Statistics will undergo evaluation and quality monitoring. This will be done by customer feedback, evaluation forms at training events and through annual review of operations and services as part of our corporate business planning processes.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Service Evaluation. 1.1 The Purchasers’ rights to evaluate As part of the ongoing management of this Agreement, the Purchasers may evaluate the provision of the Services by the Provider. This is part of the evaluation requirements of the Purchasers and contributes towards reporting to Ministers. The purpose of such evaluation is to monitor progress and quality of delivery of Services under this Agreement in terms of results against expected performance.
Sample 1
Service Evaluation. Arnerich Massena may assist clients in evaluating other professional services being provided to their accounts. Analysis may cover some or all of the following: cost and fee structure, timeliness, accuracy, quality of work, and level of overall service. Searches for trustees, custodians and administrators are also conducted analyzing these factors and using proprietary due diligence Prow Voting. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx does not exercise proxy voting authority over client securities. The obligation to vote client proxies at all time rests with clients. Clients may contact Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx for advice or information about a particular proxy vote. However, Arnerich Massena will not have proxy voting authority as a result of providing such advice to client. Should Arnerich Massena inadvertently receive proxy information for a security held in a client’s account, Arnerich Massena will forward such information to the client, but will not take any action with respect to the voting of such proxy. Upon termination of its agreement with a client, Arnerich Massena will use reasonable efforts to forward proxy information inadvertently received by it on behalf of the client to the forwarding address provided by the client. Other Services relative to the evaluation and management of investment programs and strategies may also be provided as needs are identified. Fee Schedule - as listed below (varies by client type): For its consulting services, Americh Massena charges clients either an annual retainer fee or a percentage-of-assets fee. The fee schedule specified below is used as a guideline in determining annual retainer fees and percentage-of-assets fees. Both types of fees are negotiable, depending on the range of services to be provided, the degree of customization requested, the nature and size of the account, and other circumstances involved. Private Client Services Group: Account Size Fee as a of Assets Minimum Annual Fee $5 million 45 basis points (0.45%) $ 15,000 Next $5 million 35 basis points (0.35%) Next $10 million 10 basis points (0.10%) $20 million - $39,999,999 20 to 25 basis points on all assets (0.20-0.25%) 40,000 $40 million - $99,999,999 15 to 20 basis points on all assets (0.15-0.20%) 60,000 $100 million+ 10 basis points on all assets (0.10%) Complete amended pages in full, circle amended items and with execution page (page 1). Schedule F of Form ADV Continuation Sheet for Form ADV Part Page 2 National Schedule F of Form ADV Continuation Sheet for Form Part A...
Sample 1
Service Evaluation. The Provider will provide any additional data requested which will allow for evaluation of the service. The Provider will incorporate processes to seek and record consumer consent to participate in evaluation activities undertaken by Central and Eastern Sydney PHN or related third parties. Noting that a consumer response to such request is to no way impact on a consumer’s access to, and quality of services received. The Provider will collect and review consumer experience information as part of quality improvement processes and more formally through evaluation
Sample 1
Service Evaluation. The Xxxxxxxxxx Framework will be used as part of the service specification to evaluate and assess the quality of care utilizing the following 3 categories: o “Structure” i.e. The infrastructure staff, buildings etc o “Process” i.e. What is done and how it is done, assessing quality o “Outcomes” i.e. the impact or the effects of the intervention The information set out in Appendix 2 Care Homes Evaluation Minimum Dataset outlines the data source that will be used to support and evidence the care homes evaluation minimum dataset requirements. GP practices are required to agree a robust process with their aligned care homes at the start of each contractual year for the management of their residents including who are referred for practice MDT meetings, patient reviews, xxxx rounds on fixed day and promotion of service to new and current residents.
Sample 1
Service Evaluation. Arnerich Massena may assist clients in evaluating other professional services being provided to their accounts. Analysis may cover some or all of the following: cost and fee structure, timeliness, accuracy, quality of work, and level of overall service. Searches for trustees, custodians and administrators are also conducted analyzing these factors and using proprietary due diligence Prow Voting. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx does not exercise proxy voting authority over client securities. The obligation to vote client proxies at all time rests with clients. Clients may contact Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx for advice or information about a particular proxy vote. However, Arnerich Massena will not have proxy voting authority as a result of providing such advice to client. Should Arnerich Massena inadvertently receive proxy information for a security held in a client’s account, Arnerich Massena will forward such information to the client, but will not take any action with respect to the voting of such proxy. Upon termination of its agreement with a client, Arnerich Massena will use reasonable efforts to forward proxy information inadvertently received by it on behalf of the client to the forwarding address provided by the client. Other Services relative to the evaluation and management of investment programs and strategies may also be provided as needs are identified. Fee Schedule - as listed below (varies by client type): For its consulting services, Americh Massena charges clients either an annual retainer fee or a percentage-of-assets fee. The fee schedule specified below is used as a guideline in determining annual retainer fees and percentage-of-assets fees. Both types of fees are negotiable, depending on the range of services to be provided, the degree of customization requested, the nature and size of the account, and other circumstances involved.
Sample 1
Service Evaluation. 11 ADMINISTRATOR shall evaluate CONTRACTOR’s service delivery based on, but 12 not be limited to, the following:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Service Evaluation. 7 8.1 CONTRACTOR shall be evaluated, on a quarterly basis, on the 8 effectiveness of CONTRACTOR’s service delivery based on, but not limited to, 9 the following:
Sample 1
Service Evaluation. The District of Sault Ste. Xxxxx Social Services Administration Board will evaluate the services provided by the Service Provider under each of the following categories:
Sample 1

Related to Service Evaluation

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.