Student Performance Goals Sample Clauses

Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting State academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework and the CSI annual review of schools (or its replacement). Reasonable progress will be established through the implementation of annually agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored with the CSI annual review of schools (or its replacement) and evaluated annually as set forth above.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting State academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework, as well as making reasonable progress toward meeting state standards across subgroups and subindicators. Reasonable progress will be established through the implementation of annually revisited and agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored with the Institute performance calculator, and evaluated annually with the Institute dashboard. In addition to schoolwide targets, the School shall develop specific performance targets for identified areas of improvement. These include but are not limited to students eligible for free and reduced lunch, adequate progress in Math at the elementary and high school levels, as well as measures of postsecondary readiness. In the event that the School does not meet its annually agreed-upon targets, the School must work with the Institute utilizing the School’s interim assessment results to develop seasonal benchmark targets in addition to their UIP targets. Where applicable, student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass the geographic district in which the school is housed. Student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass results of comparable Colorado schools serving similar populations. Selection of the comparison group will be determined by the Institute, utilizing a set of standardized criteria to include size, grades served, and demographic characteristics. The School acknowledges that this comparison group may change over time to better reflect the changing demographic makeup of the school. The Institute agrees to provide the School with the opportunity for input into any proposed changes before they are finalized.
Sample 1Sample 2
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework and the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement). Reasonable progress will be established and measured through the implementation of annually agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process, which shall include the AEC optional measures as approved by the Institute pursuant to Institute policies and procedures. The School’s progress will be monitored and measured with the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement) and evaluated annually as set forth above. The School agrees that the terms “reasonable progress” or “adequate progress” are defined through this process and that the School will be held accountable pursuant to these definitions.
Sample 1
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting State academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework as well as making reasonable progress toward meeting state standards across subgroups and subindicators, with specific emphasis on gaps in mathematics. Reasonable progress will be established through the implementation of annually revisited and agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored with the Institute performance calculator, and evaluated annually with the Institute dashboard. The School will also provide evidence of curriculum alignment with core content standards consistent with CDE expectations and timelines for state assessments and standards. In addition, the School will develop and provide to the Institute post-secondary and workforce readiness data as defined in the Annual Performance Report. Finally, the School will provide to the Institute 2-year performance objectives by school opening date using the goals worksheet from the UIP template. In the event that the School does not meet its annually agreed-upon targets, the School must work with the Institute utilizing the School’s interim assessment results to develop seasonal benchmark targets in addition to their UIP targets. Where applicable, student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass the geographic district in which the school is housed. Student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass results of comparable Colorado schools serving similar populations. Selection of the comparison group will be determined by the Institute, utilizing a set of standardized criteria to include size, grades served, and demographic characteristics. The School acknowledges that this comparison group may change over time to better reflect the changing demographic makeup of the school. The Institute agrees to provide the School with the opportunity for input into any proposed changes before they are finalized.
Sample 1

Related to Student Performance Goals

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit G), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out- 4.1.1 the performance objectives and targets that must be met by the Employee; and 4.1.2 the time frames within which those performance objectives and targets must be met. 4.2 The performance objectives and targets reflected in Annexure A are set by the Employer in consultation with the Employee and based on the Integrated Development Plan, Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and the Budget of the Employer, and shall include key objectives; key performance indicators; target dates and weightings. 4.2.1 The key objectives describe the main tasks that need to be done. 4.2.2 The key performance indicators provide the details of the evidence that must be provided to show that a key objective has been achieved. 4.2.3 The target dates describe the timeframe in which the work must be achieved. 4.2.4 The weightings show the relative importance of the key objectives to each other. 4.3 The Employee’s performance will, in addition, be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!