Student Performance Goals Sample Clauses

Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework and the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement). Reasonable progress will be established and measured through the implementation of annually agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored and measured with the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement) and evaluated annually as set forth above. The School agrees that the terms “reasonable progress” or “adequate progress” are defined through this process and that the School will be held accountable pursuant to these definitions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting State academic standards as defined by the Colorado AEC School Performance Framework, as well as making reasonable progress toward meeting state standards across subgroups and subindicators. Reasonable progress will be established through the implementation of annually revisited and agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored with the Institute performance calculator, and evaluated annually with the Institute dashboard. In addition to schoolwide targets, the School shall develop specific performance targets for identified areas of improvement. These include but are not limited to students eligible for free and reduced lunch, adequate progress in Math at the elementary and high school levels, as well as measures of postsecondary readiness. In the event that the School does not meet its annually agreed-upon targets, the School must work with the Institute utilizing the School’s interim assessment results to develop seasonal benchmark targets in addition to their UIP targets. Student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass results of comparable Colorado schools serving similar populations. Selection of the comparison group will be determined by the Institute, utilizing a set of standardized criteria to include size, grades served, and demographic characteristics. The School acknowledges that this comparison group may change over time to better reflect the changing demographic makeup of the school. The Institute agrees to provide the School with the opportunity for input into any proposed changes before they are finalized.
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting State academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework as well as making reasonable progress toward meeting state standards across subgroups and subindicators, with specific emphasis on gaps in mathematics. Reasonable progress will be established through the implementation of annually revisited and agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process. The School’s progress will be monitored with the Institute performance calculator, and evaluated annually with the Institute dashboard. The School will also provide evidence of curriculum alignment with core content standards consistent with CDE expectations and timelines for state assessments and standards. In addition, the School will develop and provide to the Institute post-secondary and workforce readiness data as defined in the Annual Performance Report. Finally, the School will provide to the Institute 2-year performance objectives by school opening date using the goals worksheet from the UIP template. In the event that the School does not meet its annually agreed-upon targets, the School must work with the Institute utilizing the School’s interim assessment results to develop seasonal benchmark targets in addition to their UIP targets. Where applicable, student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass the geographic district in which the school is housed. Student performance results on the state assessment shall surpass results of comparable Colorado schools serving similar populations. Selection of the comparison group will be determined by the Institute, utilizing a set of standardized criteria to include size, grades served, and demographic characteristics. The School acknowledges that this comparison group may change over time to better reflect the changing demographic makeup of the school. The Institute agrees to provide the School with the opportunity for input into any proposed changes before they are finalized.
Student Performance Goals. The School agrees to make reasonable progress towards meeting academic standards as defined by the Colorado School Performance Framework and the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement). Reasonable progress will be established and measured through the implementation of annually agreed-upon academic targets, developed through use of the Unified Improvement Plan process, which shall include the AEC optional measures as approved by the Institute pursuant to Institute policies and procedures. The School’s progress will be monitored and measured with the CSI Annual Review of Schools (or its replacement) and evaluated annually as set forth above. The School agrees that the terms “reasonable progress” or “adequate progress” are defined through this process and that the School will be held accountable pursuant to these definitions.

Related to Student Performance Goals

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!