Suggestion Awards Sample Clauses

Suggestion Awards. The Department will encourage employees to file suggestions under the Department’s Suggestion Program. Suggestions will be considered in a fair and equitable manner. Suggestion awards will be appropriate for tangible suggestions, intangible suggestions, and problem identification, as defined in the Department’s Suggestion Program. 1. In the event no decision is made regarding adoption or non-adoption of a suggestion within 90 days of submission, the employee, upon request, will be given a written or oral status report. 2. Non-adoption of employee suggestions is to be written and contain specific reasons for non-adoption. 3. If the idea set forth in a rejected suggestion is later adopted, the appropriate suggestion coordinator will reopen the case for award consideration if the matter is brought to their attention within two years after the date of rejection notice.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Suggestion Awards. In accordance with the DeCA IDEAS Program, DeCA encourages all employees to participate in the IDEAS (Improve Defense Commissary Agency Efficiency and Service) Program. The EMPLOYER will endeavor to process all awards and cost reduction ideas in a timely and expeditious manner.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Suggestion Awards. In accordance with the DeCA IDEAS Program, XxXX encourages all employees to participate in the IDEAS (Improve Defense Commissary Agency Efficiency and Service) Program. The EMPLOYER will endeavor to process all awards and cost reduction ideas in a timely and expeditious manner.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Suggestion Awards. (1) The Employer will continue a program through which employees can submit suggestions concerning the improvement of the Employer’s operations. The Employer will insure that any suggestions submitted by an employee are responded to within a reasonable period of time, but no later than 90 days from the employee’s submission. This response shall be in writing and include a decision as to whether or not the suggestion has been accepted in whole or in part, as well as an explanation of the reasons for adoption or rejection. (2) An employee who has a suggestion adopted by the Employer will receive compensation in accordance with the USDA’s Guide for Employee Recognition. (3) In the event a rejected suggestion is later implemented within a two (2) year period of the rejection date, and the employee is still employed by the Employer, the suggestion will be reconsidered at the employee's request and appropriate payment or time off award made. (4) Suggestion awards will be paid in accordance with government-wide rules and regulations.
Sample 1Sample 2
Suggestion Awards a. It is the Employer's desire that all Suggestions will be processed in an expeditious manner. To this end, it is agreed that every reasonable effort will be made to reduce inprocess time. It is further agreed that employees who encounter unreasonable delays in receiving a final determination on adoption or rejection of a submitted Suggestion may take up the matter directly, through or accompanied by a Union xxxxxxx, with the appropriate supervisor. The Employer agrees to investigate complaints of unreasonable delays in processing Suggestions and to furnish pertinent information as to the reason(s) for delay through the appropriate supervisor or official responsible for administration of the program. The Employer agrees that where unreasonable delay is found to exist, such action as is necessary to expedite processing will be initiated. Normally, for purposes of the AGREEMENT, any suggestion not adopted, rejected or otherwise acted upon within 60 days of the date filed shall be considered unreasonably delayed. b. The SUBMEPP Suggestions Program Administrator, Code 1852 shall assist employees in assuring that Suggestions are in the correct format for evaluation. c. Rejections will be in writing and the suggestor will be afforded an opportunity for a personal interview to discuss the details of the rejection. Upon request, the suggestor will be accompanied by a Union xxxxxxx. d. An employee may submit a written request for reconsideration of a rejection to the Administrator, Suggestions Program, within 30 days of receipt of the rejection notice. Such request must contain detailed reasons in rebuttal of the rejection decision.
Sample 1
Suggestion Awards. Awards may also be appropriate for employee suggestions for improvements that are implemented and benefit the Agency.
Sample 1
Suggestion Awards. A. In an effort to encourage employees to make suggestions which improve the efficiency and economy of District activities, the District hereby establishes a suggestion award program. If the District implements (based on its assessment) an employee's suggestion the following award schedule shall apply: Extent of Yearly Savings Award Up to $4,000 $50 + recognition certificate $4,000 - $10,000 $100 + recognition certificate Over $10,000 $200 + recognition certificate Suggestion system awards are limited to three (3) per year per employee. The Employee Suggestion Program procedure is available in the Human Resources Department.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Suggestion Awards. Approved suggestions may be considered for award under the program in which they were submitted.
Sample 1

Related to Suggestion Awards

  • Awards 1. The disputing parties may agree on a resolution of the dispute at any time before the tribunal issues its final award. 2. Where a tribunal makes a final award against either of the disputing parties, the tribunal may award, separately or in combination, only: (a) monetary damages and any applicable interest; and (b) restitution of property, in which case the award shall provide that the disputing Member State may pay monetary damages and any applicable interest in lieu of restitution. 3. A tribunal may also award costs and attorneys fees in accordance with this Agreement and the applicable arbitration rules. 4. A tribunal may not award punitive damages. 5. An award made by a tribunal shall have no binding force except between the disputing parties and in respect of the particular case. 6. Subject to paragraph 7 and the applicable review procedure for an interim award, the disputing party shall abide by and comply with an award without delay. (15) 7. The disputing party may not seek enforcement of a final award until: (a) in the case of a final award under the ICSID Convention: (i) 120 days has elapsed from the date the award was rendered and no disputing party has requested revision or annulment of the award; or (ii) revision or annulment proceedings have been completed; (b) in the case of a final award under the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, or the rules selected pursuant to Article 33(1)(e): (i) 90 days have elapsed from the date the award was rendered and no disputing party has commenced a proceeding to revise, set aside, or annul the award; or (ii) a court has dismissed or allowed an application to revise, set aside, or annul the award and there is no further appeal. 8. A claim that is submitted for arbitration under this Section shall be considered to arise out of a commercial relationship or transaction for purposes of Article 1 of the New York Convention. 9. Each Member State shall provide for the enforcement of an award in its territory.

  • Incentive Awards a) The Executive shall participate in the Company's annual incentive plan for senior-level executives as in effect from time to time, subject to the performance standards set by the Compensation Committee. Payment of any annual incentive award shall be made at the same time that such awards are paid to other senior-level executives of the Company. The Executive's annual incentive award target shall be set by the Compensation Committee. b) The Executive shall be eligible to receive grants under the Company's long-term incentive plans as in effect from time to time; provided, however, that the size, type and other terms and conditions of any such grant to the Executive shall be determined by the Compensation Committee.

  • Performance Awards With respect to any Performance Award, the length of any Performance Period, the Performance Goals to be achieved during the Performance Period, the other terms and conditions of such Award, and the measure of whether and to what degree such Performance Goals have been attained will be determined by the Board.

  • Equity Awards You will be eligible to receive awards of stock options or other equity awards pursuant to any plans or arrangements the Company may have in effect from time to time. The Board or Committee, as applicable, will determine in its sole discretion whether you will be granted any such equity awards and the terms of any such award in accordance with the terms of any applicable plan or arrangement that may be in effect from time to time.

  • Performance Share Awards On the Performance Share Vesting Date next following the Executive's date of death, the number of Performance Shares that shall become Vested Performance Shares shall be determined by multiplying (a) that number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to the Performance Share Agreement that would have become Vested Performance Shares had no such termination occurred; provided, however, in no case shall the number of Performance Shares that become Vested Performance Shares exceed 100% of the Target Number of Performance Shares set forth in the Performance Share Agreement, by (b) the ratio of the number of full months of the Executive's employment with the Company during the Performance Period (as defined in the Performance Share Agreement) to the number of full months contained in the Performance Period. Vested Common Shares shall be issued in settlement of such Vested Performance Shares on the Settlement Date next following the Executive’s date of death.

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P=Performance Indicator E=Explanatory Indicator M=Monitoring Indicator 2022/23 Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 ≥1 Total Margin (P) 0 ≥0 Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from Home and Community Care Support Services (HCCSS) Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a Quality and Resident Safety Indicators Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Incentive Bonus Plan Employee shall be eligible for a bonus opportunity of up to 65% of his annual base salary in accordance with the Company’s Incentive Bonus Plan as modified from time to time, payable in cash and/or equity of the Company (at the Company’s discretion). The bonus payment and the Company’s targeted performance shall be determined and approved by the Board or the compensation committee thereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!