Summary of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Summary of Evaluation. During the third year of the evaluation process, the professor will summarize evaluation activities and findings of Years One and Two. The Regular Faculty Summary Report (H.9) will include: • Summary of progress made on goals and objectivesSummary of the self-evaluations • Yearly report of supplemental hours (from the previous three (3) years) • Student evaluationsPeer evaluations (classroom evaluations). This report will be submitted to the division xxxx by the end of the 6th week of the spring semester.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of Evaluation. The employee’s signature below acknowledges the presentation and receipt of this evaluation document, but does not necessarily indicate the employee agrees with content. Signature (Staff Member) Date Signature (Principal/Supervisor) Date NEW CERTIFICATED STAFF Certificated Staff Evaluation Process
Summary of Evaluation. Each year of the evaluation process, the department chair, in consultation with the appropriate manager, or the appropriate manager shall prepare an Adjunct Faculty Summary Evaluation (H.8) to summarize findings of any appropriate evaluation activities for the year.
Summary of Evaluation. Overall rating of the faculty member’s teaching and non-teaching performances: [ ] Exceeds expectations [ ] Meets expectations [ ] Needs improvement [ ] Unsatisfactory • Recommended for continued employment: [ ] Yes [ ] No (If “no,” a plan and timetable designed to address specific areas of improvement shall be produced and agreed upon by the faculty member, the evaluator, and the appropriate Vice President.) Signature of Evaluator: Date: Signature of Full-Time Faculty Member: Date: * Attachments to this evaluation form shall include any material provided by the full-time faculty member to be included in the evaluation. * The full-time faculty member shall provide to the evaluator a written summary that reviews the full-time faculty member’s activities and accomplishments in teaching, including how he/she has utilized the student feedback received each semester, curriculum development, research/creative achievement, relevant service, activities associated to the College’s strategic initiative or other areas of responsibility since the last formal evaluation. This written summary shall be attached to the evaluation. * A copy of this completed evaluation sheet and all attachments must be given to the full-time faculty member reviewed. * The faculty member’s signature acknowledges receipt of the review document and does not necessarily indicate the full- time faculty member’s agreement with its content. Appendix B.1 LAKE LAND COLLEGE STUDENT EVALUATION OF COURSE AND FULL-TIME INSTRUCTIONAL FACULTY‌‌ Instructor’s Name Semester: Fall Spring Summer Year Course Title Section Number Please complete the following evaluation. DO NOT IDENTIFY YOURSELF. Instructors will receive the evaluation results after grades have been submitted. Please circle the response most appropriate
Summary of Evaluation. The professor will summarize evaluation activities and findings. The H.6.a Self Evaluation will include: • Summary of progress made on goals and objectives from the previous evaluation cycle
Summary of Evaluation. Deadlines of the Contract shall be granted, whether the request for extension is from the District side or the faculty side.
Summary of Evaluation. Each year of the evaluation process, the department chair, in consultation with the appropriate manager, or the appropriate manager shall prepare an Adjunct Faculty Summary Evaluation H.8 to summarize findings of any appropriate evaluation activities for the year. A summary meeting shall be held with the adjunct faculty member in such cases where feedback is needed to improve teaching or professional performance. In cases where the rating is falls below “performance meets the standard” (#2), evaluative comments shall identify Teaching Faculty Performance Expectancies applicable to adjunct faculty, as outlined in Article 18.K.2, in addition to performance issues documented in student evaluations, classroom visitations, and/or in student complaints. In the case of a rating of “improvement recommended” (#3), specific suggestions for improvement shall be provided. In cases where the rating is “improvement recommended” (#3), the faculty summary evaluation shall be submitted by the 15th week of the term for review by the division xxxx or appropriate manager. Adjunct Faculty Summary Evaluations, where the rating is “performance exceeds the standards” (#1), “performance meets the standards” (#2), or “performance does not meet the standards” (#4), shall be submitted by the last week of the term for review by the division xxxx or appropriate manager.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of Evaluation. Section IV: Date of Conference: Signature of Evaluator: Date: Signature of Educator: Date:

Related to Summary of Evaluation

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Purpose of Evaluation 10.1.1 It is recognized that a system of evaluation is essential to assist Unit Members in developing competency and realizing their potential. It is further recognized that information gathered through such a system will enable decisions that measure a Unit Member’s performance in a just and equitable manner.

  • Timing of Evaluations Annual performance evaluations shall normally take place near the anniversary date of completion of original probation. However, as to employees who have been rehired as a restoration or after a reduction in force, the date of rehire shall be the anniversary date for the annual evaluation. The Human Resources Department will attempt to secure agency cooperation in conducting the evaluation process in reasonable relationship to the above schedule. Failure to conduct a timely annual rating shall not be grievable. Deadline for Evaluation Meetings: A meeting to discuss an evaluation shall be held within forty- five (45) days after the applicable anniversary date, or after the end of any prescriptive period for remediation (“PPR”) or warning period. This deadline may be extended to accommodate the employee’s illness or injury. Where the deadline is not satisfied, the employee shall be granted an annual overall presumptive rating equal to their last annual overall rating, but not less than a Satisfactory (“S”) rating. However, if the time for annual evaluation falls during a PPR or warning period (See Disciplinary Action Article, Section 1(e)(ii) & (iii), the annual evaluation shall be waived, and the last evaluation in such process shall be deemed to be the annual evaluation. In the event the time for annual evaluation falls subsequent to the issuance of a notice of performance deficiency (Step 1) but prior to the commencement of a PPR, the employer may issue an evaluation which does not supersede the previously issued notice. A special evaluation may be used at any time except it shall not be used as a late annual evaluation. Written feedback furnished to an employee which would have constituted the annual evaluation had it been timely conducted, shall not be considered as an evaluation, shall not be placed in the employee’s file at the time of issuance, shall not be grievable and does not require the presence of a union representative when issued. An oral or written notice of performance deficiency (Step 1 in the order of progressive corrective action) shall not be grievable when issued, and, when issued, shall not require the presence of a union representative. However, once Step 2 of progressive corrective action has been implemented (a special or annual evaluation coupled with a PPR) such notice or a written record of such notice shall be placed in the employee’s personnel file and shall be fully grievable.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!