Accident Review Procedure Sample Clauses

Accident Review Procedure. The City's Risk Manager and the Union Safety Chairperson shall conduct joint investigations of any accident involving the death of an employee or serious disabling injury causing potential extended periods of disability or permanent disability. The City's Risk Manager shall prepare a written report of the accident investigation findings. Such report shall be amended to incorporate any supplemental or exception report of the Union Safety Chairperson or any employee or Management employee involved. Such investigation shall be completed as soon as possible. A copy of the final accident investigation report shall be filed with the Central Safety Committee and the Union President for review and advisory recommendation to the City Manager.

Accident Review Procedure. The following procedure will be followed in determining the action which shall be taken when an employee authorized to operate a vehicle owned or leased by the Board of Education is involved in an accident resulting in personal injury, death, or property damage in excess of $500.00. Absent some evidence of the dollar amount of the damage, the Business Manager shall make the appropriate assessment, utilizing whatever assistance he/she deems necessary. A written report of all accidents shall be filed by the employee with the Buildings and Grounds Manager within 24 hours of the accident, on forms supplied by the Buildings and Grounds Manager’s Office, or during the immediately following workday, unless illness or injury to the employee prevents such, in which case the report shall be filed on the day the employee returns to work. If property damage is involved in an accident, the initial estimate of such damage shall be made by the Buildings and Grounds Manager or his/her designee, which designee may be an insurance company or adjustor or vehicle repair shop. Whenever an employee is driving a District vehicle on public roadways or through parking lots and there is physical contact between it and another vehicle or stationary object while the District vehicle is in motion, with any resulting damage to either vehicle or other object, but which is insufficient to warrant an accident report, the driver of the District vehicle shall file an incident report on such forms as may be prescribed by the administration. Upon the third filing of such incident report during a year, the driver may be required to attend a hearing to explain the cause of such incidents, and/or may be require to take corrective action to avoid such incidents in the future. Continuation of such incidents may lead to disciplinary action against the driver. Three persons shall serve on a Review Panel to review the facts and circumstances of the accident. These persons will be:

Accident Review Procedure. ‌ 20.01 The Director of Transportation Services shall investigate all accidents and render a decision as to whether it is preventable or non-preventable within ten (10) working days following said accident. This time limit may be extended by mutual consent of the District and the Union. Standards established by the National Safety Council will be used to determine preventability. The recommendations of the Director of Transportation shall be followed unless, within ten (10) working days of notification, the employee, with knowledge of the Union, wishes to dispute the Director's recommendations. To request a review by the Accident Review Committee, the driver will submit, in writing, a request for review to the Director of Transportation. In which case, the dispute shall be referred to the Accident Review Committee for further action. 20.02 The Accident Review Committee will be made up of three (3) members who have expertise in the area of pupil transportation and/or traffic safety. The committee will meet at least three (3) times per school year. The District will be represented on the committee by the District's Risk Manager or designee; the Union will be represented by the Business Representative or designee. The third member will be chosen by mutual consent of the District and the Union. The committee shall be chaired alternate years by the District and the Union representatives on the committee. The District representative will act as chairperson during school years that begin in an even year and the Union during those that begin in odd years. 20.03 Members of the Accident Review Committee shall investigate all accidents brought to its attention by the employee or the District, and shall render a decision as to the whether it is preventable or non-preventable using the standards established by the National Safety Council. The recommendations of the Committee shall be followed. In the event that the Committee cannot make a decision, the accident will be submitted by the District to the National Safety Council for their review. Decisions rendered by the National Safety Council will be final.

Accident Review Procedure. 1. The Director of Transportation Services shall investigate all accidents and render a decision as to whether it is preventable or non-preventable within twenty (20) working days following said accident. This time limit may be extended by mutual consent of the District and the Union. Standards established by the National Safety Council will be used to determine preventability. The recommendations of the Director of Transportation shall be followed unless, within twenty (20) working days of notification, the employee, with knowledge of the Union, wishes to dispute the Director's recommendations. To request a review by the Accident Review Committee, the driver will submit, in writing, a request for review to the Director of Transportation. In which case, the dispute shall be referred to the Accident Review Committee for further action. 2. The Accident Review Committee will be made up of three (3) members who have expertise in the area of pupil transportation and/or traffic safety. The committee will meet at least three

Accident Review Procedure. The Committee will meet as necessary to conduct accident reviews. The Committee will use the National Safety Council Safe Driver Award Rules guidelines and the For Experts Only booklet to make these determinations. Valley Transit will provide copies of these documents in an accessible location for committee members to review at their leisure. Accidents will be reviewed and determined within thirty-five (35) days of the occurrence of the accident unless a reasonable request for an extension is mutually accepted between Valley Transit and the Union. The format of the meetings will generally include: a review of all reports and documentation relating to the accident, a vote of the Committee by secret ballot, and the counting of ballots by the chairperson. All voting members of the Committee must be present and must cote to validate the decision. However, Accident Review Committee members shall not review an accident involving their spouse, domestic partner, or sibling. If the Committee is tied on a decision, the General Manager will review the accident and cast the final ballot. All accident reports, determination decisions, and request for appeals will be forwarded to the Operations Manager. The Operations Manager will be responsible for the tracking of accidents and for the scheduling of accident review meetings. Following the review of an accident, the accident Review Committee will decide and notify the employee of its decision within five (5) days.

Related to Accident Review Procedure

Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:
Claims and Review Procedure In the event that any claim for benefits that must initially be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors, is denied (in whole or in part) hereunder, the claimant shall receive from First Charter a notice of denial in writing within 60 days, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for denial, with specific reference to pertinent provisions of this Supplemental Agreement. Any disagreements about such interpretations and construction shall be submitted to an arbitrator subject to the rules and procedures established by the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator shall be acceptable to both First Charter and the Executive (or Beneficiary); if the parties cannot agree on a single arbitrator, the disagreement shall be heard by a panel of three arbitrators, with each party to appoint one arbitrator and the third to be chosen by the other two. No member of the Board of Directors shall be liable to any person for any action taken under Article VIII except those actions undertaken with lack of good faith.
Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.
Review Procedures a. In consultation with the Illinois SHPO, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Upon the determination by the CRS that a proposed undertaking is included in Appendix A, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the SHPO for that undertaking. A list of undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties comprises Appendix B. b. The lists of undertakings provided in Appendices A and B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the SHPO without requiring an amendment to this Illinois Prototype Agreement. The NRCS State Office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale for classifying the practices accordingly. c. Undertakings identified in Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V. a. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to implementing the undertaking. 1) NRCS may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11. 2) The NRCS shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties. 3) Where the NRCS proposes a finding of "no historic properties affected" or "no adverse effect" to historic properties, the SHPO shall have 30 calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. The NRCS shall take into account all timely comments. i. If the SHPO, or another consulting party, disagrees with NRCS' findings and/or determination, it shall notify the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar daytime period. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO or other consulting party to attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved through this consultation, NRCS shall follow the dispute resolution process in Stipulation VIII below. ii. If the SHPO does not respond to the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar day period and/or the NRCS receives no objections from other consulting parties, or if the SHPO concurs with the NRCS' determination and proposed actions to avoid adverse effects, the NRCS shall document the concurrence/lack of response within the review time noted above and may move forward with the undertaking. 4) Where a proposed undertaking may adversely affect historic properties, NRCS shall describe proposed measures to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects, and follow the process in 36 CFR Part 800.6, including consultation with other consulting patties and notification to the ACHP, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement to resolve the adverse effects. Should the proposed undertaking have the potential to adversely affect a known NHL, the NRCS shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions that may be necessary to minimize harm to the NHL in accordance with 54 U.S.C. § 306107 of the NHPA and 36 CFR Part 800.6 and 800.10, including consultation with the ACHP and respective National Park Service, Regional National Historic Landmark Program Coordinator, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement. d. NRCS will conduct archaeological surveys and will submit reports and other documentation to SHPO for review and comment. When no archaeological sites have been located by the archaeological survey, NRCS may proceed with the proposed undertaking. Reports for negative surveys must be submitted to SHPO on a quarterly basis. All positive and negative reports submitted to SHPO will be sent digitally for submission to the Inventory of Illinois Archaeological Sites (IAS) data file maintained by staff at the Illinois State Museum (ISM) housed under the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The NRCS further agrees that access to specific site location data will be restricted to the CRS, the NRCS field personnel installing conservation practices adjacent to the cultural resource, and the landowner. Specific site location information for individual projects will be maintained in a secure cultural resources file kept in the field offices and will not be available to the public. e. Curation: NRCS personnel will not collect artifactual material during routine field inspections. However, if a professional survey, evaluation testing, or mitigation is required, NRCS shall ensure that all materials and records resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities on federal or state property are curated by the Illinois State Museum. The NRCS shall ensure that all records resulting from cultural resource surveys or data recovery activities on private property are curated by the Illinois State Museum or an equivalent curation facility in accordance with 36 CFR Part 79. Subject to the landowner's permission, all objects resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities are maintained by the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution until their analysis is complete and they are returned to their owner(s). Although landowners will be encouraged to donate artifactual material, it is understood that objects collected on private land remain the property of the landowner(s) unless the landowner(s) donates the material to the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution. This excludes burial goods, as stipulated by XXXXXX.
AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.
Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:
Claims and Review Procedures 6.1 For all claims other than Disability benefits:
Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.
Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings
Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

Accident Review Procedure Sample Clauses

Filter & Search

Related Clauses

Parent Clauses

Related to Accident Review Procedure