Administrative Considerations. All questions concerning BPAs will be directed to the GSA Contracting Officers (contact information identified in section RFQ.5). The GSA Contracting Officer and the Alternate Contracting Officer are the only individuals with the authority to amend BPAs.
Administrative Considerations. The BPA Contracting Officer is the only person authorized to make or approve any changes to the requirements or terms and conditions contained in this BPA. In the event the contractor makes any BPA changes at the direction of any person other than the BPA Contracting Officer, the change will be considered to have been made without authority and no adjustment will be allowed to cover any increase in cost incurred as a result thereof.
Administrative Considerations. 15 A. The USACE and BSEE shall attach this PA or the stipulations listed in this legally 16 enforceable PA to any agency-specific permits, licenses, and other approvals that are 17 subject to 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(y) so that appropriate provisions of this PA and its 18 requirements become binding on the Permittee, so long as the underlying PA remains 19 in effect for the area covered by the relevant permits, licenses, and other approvals.
Administrative Considerations. An error and omission was made by the District’s benefit consultant, Hub International, when preparing benefit plan options considered during bargaining.The deductible level in the Consumer Driven Health Plan (CDHP) with Health Savings Account (HSA) does not meet the required minimum deductible specified by the IRS for calendar year 2019. Because the deductible is embedded, not an aggregate, the IRS deductible threshold is $2,700 for single coverage and $5,400 for single plus dependent coverage. The deductible agreed to in bargaining for the CDHP with HSA was $2,500/$5,000. In order to be compliant with IRS regulations the deductible levels for the CDHP will be increased by $200 for employee single coverage and $400 for employee plus dependents. In addition, the Board contribution to the HSA will be increased by $200 for employee single and $400 for employee plus dependents for those who elect to participate in the CDHP with HSA. Through a contract amendment with a performance guarantee of 20%, Hub, will reimburse the Board the additional HSA contribution amount.
Administrative Considerations. A. The Signatories shall attach this Agreement or the measures (stipulations) called for in this Agreement to any Record(s) of Decision (ROD), approved permit(s), or other condition(s) issued for this Undertaking so that this Agreement and its requirements become legally enforceable and binding on those actions.
B. This Agreement and all of its requirements shall be binding on ARRC, as the current applicant for the STB authorization, and on its heirs, successors, and assignees.
C. The Signatories shall enforce the terms of this Agreement, approvals, and other conditions that incorporate this Agreement and its terms. Each shall notify the others if any of them becomes aware of an instance of possible non-compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or permit or conditions as they relate to this Agreement. In such case, the Signatories shall ensure compliance consistent with their legal authorities and consult with the other agencies, as needed.
Administrative Considerations. Pursuant to 204(b) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, responsible Federal Agency officials may meet or enter into project level MOUs with officials of State, Tribal and local Governments or their designees. During such meetings in this instance, implementation and monitoring of this MOU should note views, information and advice exchanged. Nothing in this MOU will be construed as limiting or affecting in any way the authority or legal responsibility of the parties identified in Attachment 1 and the BLM, or as mandating performance beyond the respective authority of each party, or to require that a party assume or expend any sum in excess of appropriations available. It is understood that all the provisions herein must be within the financial, legal, and personnel limitations of the parties identified in Attachment 1 and the BLM. This MOU is neither a fiscal nor a funds obligation document. Nothing in this MOU will be construed to extend jurisdiction or decision-making authority to BLM for management any non-federally administered lands or resources in the project area (see Attachment 2). Similarly, nothing in this MOU will be construed to extend any jurisdiction or decision-making authority to the parties identified in Attachment 1 for management of land or resource uses on the Federal lands or mineral estates administered by the BLM. All parties identified in Attachment 1 and BLM will work together cooperatively and will communicate about issues of mutual concern.
Administrative Considerations. 3.1. The agreement must specify the minimum amount of time the PhD student will spend at each University, in order to guarantee effective co-supervision by each Institution.
3.2. The PhD student will be responsible for all procedures related to the necessary health and social security cover in the country to which XXX belongs. In order to receive accreditation for the period spent abroad, proof of accident and health insurance for the said country, as well as insurance cover for repatriation in the case of illness or death, is required.
3.3. The agreement to co-supervision will be registered at both Universities. The PhD student will be responsible for paying those public charges and Academic Insurance premiums, if applicable, required by the ULE, as well as costs related to the presentation and defence of the PhD thesis and any other additional costs which may arise.
3.4. The ULE PhD Commission will maintain a register of all PhD theses defended which have been co-supervised.
3.5. With regard to deposition, author’s rights and reproduction of the thesis, as well as intellectual property in the University where the thesis has been submitted, procedures will comply with those regulations currently in force at the time.
3.6. Independently of the stipulations set out in the present agreement framework, The PhD student may obtain, both from the ULE and the XXX, the Title of Doctor, with the mention “European PhD”, providing that the regulations and specific requirements necessary for obtaining this qualification have been fulfilled.
Administrative Considerations. Pursuant to 204(b) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, responsible Federal agency officials may meet or enter into project-level MOUs with officials of State, Tribal, and local governments or their designees. During such meetings and development, implementation, and monitoring of such MOUs, views, information, and advice are exchanged or input relative to the implementation of Federal programs is obtained. Such meetings and MOUs will further the administration of intergovernmental coordination.
Administrative Considerations. Where policies of Grantee differ from those of the State, such as travel reimbursement, fringe benefits, indirect costs, etc., the policies of the Grantee shall be applicable to cost incurrences under the Agreement provided such policies comply with awarding agency regulations.
Administrative Considerations. The rent will be the usual $15,000 per room. The lease runs for 12 months. It is not automatically renewable, although the District generally seeks to keep these programs in-District.
