Allocation of Points. (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the General Partner shall be responsible for the allocation of Points from time to time to the Limited Partners. The General Partner may allocate Points to a new Limited Partner and/or increase the Points of any existing Limited Partner, in each case, solely in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
Allocation of Points. (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the General Partner shall be responsible for the allocation of Points from time to time to the Limited Partners. The General Partner may allocate Points to a new Limited Partner and/or increase the Points of any existing Limited Partner at any time; provided that (i) if the General Partner or its designee determines that a Limited Partner has engaged in Bad Acts or violated any of his restrictive covenants in favor of AGM or any of its Affiliates, such Limited Partner’s Points shall be forfeited as of the date of such engagement or violation determined by the General Partner, and (ii) the allocation or reallocation of Points will be on such terms as are consistent with the treatment of the Points as profits interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Points issued in respect of a particular Class or tranche of Interests shall constitute a “single” pool and entitle the holders hereof to share in all of the Operating Profit and Operating Loss of the Partnership attributable to such Class or tranche of Interests, howsoever derived, on the terms and conditions set forth herein. As of the date hereof, 100,000 Points are reserved for allocation and such number of aggregate Points so reserved shall not be increased or reduced unless otherwise determined by the General Partner.
Allocation of Points. (b) Except as otherwise provided herein, the General Partner shall be responsible for the allocation of Points from time to time to the Limited Partners. At each such time of allocation, all Points available for allocation shall be so allocated to the Limited Partners (including APH) by the General Partner. Points allocated to Limited Partners (other than APH) may not be reduced except as set forth in Section 6.1 and this Article 7. Upon any allocation of Points (other than Excess Points) by the General Partner to an existing or new Limited Partner other than APH, there shall be a corresponding reduction in the Points of APH, as provided in Section 6.1. (a) The aggregate number of Points assigned or available for assignment to all Partners shall initially be 300. The General Partner intends generally to allocate all 300 Points to Limited Partners other than APH. ...
Allocation of Points. Approved Claimants will be assigned points at the sole discretion of the Claims Administrator, subject to the right of appeal provided herein. The Claims Administrator will assign points based on the totality of the information and resources available to it, using its best judgment and expertise to fairly and reasonably adjudicate claims. In the event that an Approved Claimant meets the criteria for both qualifying treatment(s) and qualifying surgery(s), the Approved Claimant shall receive the points allocated to both levels. In the event that an Approved Claimant received more than one BSC Transvaginal Mesh Device, the Approved Claimant shall receive the points allocated to each BSC Transvaginal Mesh Device, including any points allocated for qualifying treatment(s) and qualifying surgery(s) attributable to each BSC Transvaginal Mesh Device. BASE POINTS LEVEL DESCRIPTION POINTS 1 Device only (does not qualify in any other category). *Points allocated for Level 1 claims shall be capped at a maximum for $4,000.00 for each device implanted. 4 points Qualifying Treatment(s) (maximum qualifying treatment points = 9)
Allocation of Points. 21 Section 7.2 Effect of Withdrawal on Points ........................................................................22 ARTICLE 8
Allocation of Points. 19 Section 7.2 Effect of Withdrawal on Points ........................................................................20 Section 7.3 Points as Profits Interests .................................................................................20 ARTICLE 8
Allocation of Points. Other Administrative Staff will earn a rubric score of four, three, two, or one based on evidence collected and the alignment of the evidence with the Multidimensional rubric. Depending on the nature of the evidence, it is possible for Other Administrative Staff to earn half step scores. In other words, if evidence supports part of the “level three” rubric language and part of the “level four” rubric language, Other Administrative Staff are able to earn a score of 3.5. The scores are defined as follows: Four = Highly Effective Three = Effective Two = Developing One = Ineffective Other Administrative Staff scores will be collected on the attached form throughout each school year. The highest score in each component will be recorded as part of the year-end evaluation. Other Administrative Staff will meet with Superintendent between May 1 and 15, to review evidence collected to support proficiency in the components of the Multidimensional rubric. Superintendent will provide Other Administrative Staff with a written year-end evaluation no later than June 15. The HEDI rating and 60-point conversion for the Other Administrative Staff will be for District use only, as these scores are not currently required for State Education Department submission.
Allocation of Points. (a) A “Point” means a 1/x share of Operating Profit or Operating Loss, where x equals the aggregate number of Points assigned or available for assignment at the relevant time. The aggregate number of Points assigned or available for assignment to all Partners shall initially be 2,000. (b) Except as otherwise provided herein, the General Partner shall be responsible for the allocation of Points from time to time to the Limited Partners. At each such time of
Allocation of Points. Principals will earn a rubric score of four, three, two, or one based on evidence collected and the alignment of the evidence with the Multidimensional rubric. Depending on the nature of the evidence, it is possible for Principals to earn half step scores. In other words, if evidence supports part of the “level three” rubric language and part of the “level four” rubric language, Principals are able to earn a score of 3.5. The scores are defined as follows: Four = Highly Effective Three = Effective Two = Developing One = Ineffective Principal scores will be collected on the attached form throughout each school year. The highest score in each component will be recorded as part of the year-end evaluation (see format attached as Exhibit C). Principal will meet with Superintendent between May 1 and 15, to review evidence collected to support proficiency in the components of the Multidimensional rubric. Superintendent will provide Principal with a written year-end evaluation no later than June 15. Domain 1: Shared Vision of Learning Domain 2: School Culture and Instructional Program Rubric Scores Rubric Scores 1a. – Culture 2a. Culture 1b – Sustainability 2b. Instructional Program 2c. Capacity Building 2d. Sustainability 2e. Strategic Planning Process Domain 1 Rubric Scores /2 Domain 2 Rubric Scores /5 Domain 1 Average Domain 2 Average Domain 3: Safe, Efficient, Effective Learning Environment Domain 4: Community 3a. Capacity Building 4a. Strategic Planning Process: Inquiry 3b. Culture 4b. Culture 3c. Sustainability 4c. Sustainability 3d. Instructional Program Domain 3 Rubric Scores /4 Domain 4 Rubric Scores /3 Domain 3 Average Domain 4 Average Domain 5: Integrity, Fairness, Ethics Domain 6: Political, Social, Economic, Legal and Cultural Context 5a. Sustainability 6a. Sustainability 5b. Culture 6b. Culture Domain 4 Rubric Scores /2 Domain 3 Rubric Scores /2 Domain 4 Average Domain 3 Average Domains Average (from above)
Allocation of Points. Approved Claimants will be assigned points at the sole discretion of the Claims Administrator, subject to the right of appeal provided herein. The Claims Administrator will assign points based on the totality of the information and resources available to it, using its best judgment and expertise to fairly and reasonably adjudicate claims. In the event that an Approved Claimant meets the criteria for more than one injury level, the Approved Claimant shall receive the cumulative number of points allocated to each Injury level. XXXX XXXXXX
