Appraisal Criteria. The main factor in in assessing candidate schemes will be the extent to which they contribute to the targets detailed in the Regional Economic Strategy and their value for money, however, to make these assessments detailed information on those proposed schemes is required and will be developed by addressing the criteria detailed below. The City Deal provides an opportunity to continue tackling the area’s barriers to economic growth by: improving transport connectivity; increasing skill levels still further; supporting people into work; and giving businesses the support they need to innovate and grow. The City Deal therefore includes12: Connecting the region; Support for innovation and improving the digital network; Developing a skilled workforce and tackling unemployment; Supporting enterprise and business growth; and Housing development and regeneration. In addition, the City Deal, over its lifetime, is expected to deliver up to 25,000 new jobs and leverage an additional £4 billion of private sector investment. All Candidate Schemes are required to demonstrate how they will contribute to one or more of these objectives, and others contained in the Regional Economic Strategy, and why the scheme is needed. The Growth and Competitiveness Commission have recommended that all Candidate Scheme should also demonstrate13: Significant scale; A positive impact on GVA; A positive impact on jobs; An impact beyond the local boundary area of where the investment takes place and does not displace activity within the city-region; Alignment with the proposed Metro investment, including investment that can unlock benefits of the Metro and address access constraints; In addition, schemes need to demonstrate a quantifiable impact on at least two of the following:
Appraisal Criteria. A single appraisal approach will be applied to all projects, which will be transparent and equitable. The project appraisal criteria will include: • fit with the Growth Strategy, SIF objectives and other relevant strategies – including strategic linkages with other thematic projects; • clear evidence of the rationale and need (or demand) for the project and application of best practice; • the additional GVA and employment impacts, as well as the wider benefits, at the LCR level; • clearly defined inputs, activities, outputs, and anticipated outcomes and an assessment of additionality (including displacement and deadweight); • clear detail of the financial costs of the proposal and evidence of the need for SIF support and availability of match funding; • confirmation that the investment represents value for money (the degree to which benefits exceed costs assessed using Benefit Cost Ratios and Net Present Public Value) and is the preferred option; • that the project has robust risk management, delivery, and monitoring and evaluation arrangements; and • that the project complies with necessary regulations and requirements, including legal due diligence requirements and state aid. Preference will be given to support in the form of loans or investments that generate a return, along with additional business rates and/or Council Tax generated being recycled to the Fund on a pro-rata basis reflecting public sector investment. In addition, private and other public sector leverage will be maximised. Projects will be appraised against these criteria and should also meet minimum thresholds and requirements (for example, a Benefit Cost Ratio that is at least acceptable and meets the established guidance for that project type7).
Appraisal Criteria. 7.1 The appraisal criteria will include both the generalist and special interest aspects of the work.
7.2 Arrangements for continuing professional development will be agreed, including regular monitoring meetings attended by participating practices and specialist service providers.
Appraisal Criteria. The following appraisal criteria shall apply to Sections 5.2.2.3 through 5.2.2.6.
Appraisal Criteria. A single appraisal approach will be applied to all projects, which will be transparent and equitable. The project appraisal criteria will include: fit with the Growth Strategy, SIF objectives and other relevant strategies – including strategic linkages with other thematic projects; clear evidence of the rationale and need (or demand) for the project and application of best practice; the additional GVA and employment impacts, as well as the wider benefits, at the LCR level; clearly defined inputs, activities, outputs, and anticipated outcomes and an assessment of additionality (including displacement and deadweight); clear detail of the financial costs of the proposal and evidence of the need for SIF support and availability of match funding; confirmation that the investment represents value for money (the degree to which benefits exceed costs assessed using Benefit Cost Ratios and Net Present Public Value) and is the preferred option in line with the most recent HM Treasury Green Book guidance; that the project has robust risk management, delivery, and monitoring and evaluation arrangements; and that the project complies with necessary regulations and requirements, including legal due diligence requirements and state aid. The LCR Single Investment Fund has been established with a principle of becoming a self-sustaining fund over time. Subject to vfm considerations, preference will be given to support in the form of loans or investments that generate a return, along with additional business rates and/or Council Tax generated being recycled to the Fund on a pro-rata basis reflecting public sector investment. In addition, private and other public sector leverage will be maximised. Projects will be appraised against these criteria and should also meet minimum thresholds and requirements (for example, a Benefit Cost Ratio that is at least acceptable and meets the established guidance for that project type8). For transport projects, the expectation is that all schemes must achieve “high” value for money (as set out within DfT’s guidance) at all stages of the approval process, and independently verified on behalf of the Combined Authority as part of the assessment process. Such projects must also have been subject to earlier rigour to de-scope the scheme, or else to explore higher VfM alternatives. Notwithstanding the above principles on value for money, the CA will be able to approve transport schemes having lower VfM, having regard to specific c...
Appraisal Criteria. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services and labor necessary for a complete appraisal in a report format specified by the AGENCY complying with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and other applicable Federal, State and County requirements (hereinafter Report). Reports on parcels for which a date of value has been set are due within 90 days of receipt of a written Notice to Proceed and approval of the contract or no later than 90 days prior to trial, whichever is sooner. Ownership and other legal matters relative to the parcel(s) are to be found in the title reports, sketches, and other data to be obtained from the AGENCY by the CONSULTANT. The following general format should be used by the CONSULTANT:
Appraisal Criteria. The following appraisal criteria shall apply to Article 1, Sections 4.2.2.3 through 4.2.2.6. Asiana Airlines, Inc.- First Amendment- Lease 7-25-17/k-drive/NAK/Leases v2
