Completion of Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

Completion of Evaluation Process a. The summative evaluation of a counselor shall be based upon the Ohio Standards for School Counselors that are assessed during the walk- throughs and observations. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the counselor evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed by the counselor to verify notification to the counselor that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the counselor’s signature should not be construed as evidence that the counselor agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be completed by May 10, signed by both parties, and sent to the Superintendent.

Completion of Evaluation Process. The performance evaluation of an employee shall be based upon the observations of the employee’s performance and any documented deficiencies and shall acknowledge the satisfactory performance of the employee evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. If an employee receives a “2” or “3”, the evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report will be signed by the employee to acknowledge notification that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the employee’s signature is not to be construed as evidence that the employee agrees with the contents of the evaluation report.

Completion of Evaluation Process. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report must then be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher's signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be sent to the superintendent.

Completion of Evaluation Process a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures and performance that is assessed during the walk- throughs and observations. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher's signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be completed by May 10, signed by both parties, and sent to the Superintendent.

Completion of Evaluation Process. The Final Summative Rating of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures and performance that is assessed during the walkthroughs and observations. The Rating shall acknowledge the performance of the teacher evaluated as well as performance. The evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. The Final Summative Rating shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed by the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher’s signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The Final Summative Rating shall be completed between April 1 and May 10, signed by both parties, and then sent to the Superintendent.

Completion of Evaluation Process a. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures and performance that is assessed during the walkthroughs and observations. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator and the teacher to verify notification to the teacher that the evaluation will be placed in the teacher’s personnel file, but the teacher’s signature should not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. b. The teacher shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the teacher’s personnel file. A copy, signed by both parties, may be retained by the teacher.

Completion of Evaluation Process. The performance evaluation of a member shall be based upon the observations of the member's performance and other deficiencies as identified through Article 403 Section B (stated previously). The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths (if any) of the member as well as performance deficiencies (if any). The evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator and member to verify notification that the evaluation will be placed on file. The member's signature should not be construed as evidence that the member agrees with the contents of the evaluation report.

Completion of Evaluation Process. 1. The summative evaluation of a teacher shall be equally based upon student growth measures and individual teacher performance that is assessed during the walkthroughs and observations. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the teacher evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note all the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator. The evaluation report should then be signed by the teacher to verify notification of the teacher that the evaluation will be placed on file, but the teacher’s signature shall not be construed as evidence that the teacher agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The evaluation report shall be completed by May 10, signed by both parties, and sent to the Superintendent. 2. The Board shall evaluate each teacher who received a rating of accomplished on the teacher’s most recent evaluation conducted under this section once every two school years unless at the end of a contract cycle. In that case, the biennial evaluation shall be completed by the first day of May of the applicable school year, and the teacher shall receive a written report of the results of the evaluation by the tenth day of May of that school year. 3. In the event that a teacher has not been evaluated for the current school year, they will be rated as skilled for that year’s evaluation cycle. 4. In the event that extenuating conditions (approved extended leaves of absence) prevent the completion of 2 SLOs or linkage of value added data, the teacher will receive 50% shared attribution from the district’s value added data. This does not apply to teachers who fail to complete their SLOs for unapproved reasons. Failure to complete an SLO would result in a rating of 1 for each incomplete item.

Completion of Evaluation Process. 1. A copy of the final evaluation report, that includes the holistic performance rating and the student growth measure rating, shall be given to the educator at the final post-observation conference or at another conference scheduled no later than May 10. 2. All applicable documents and forms shall be signed by the evaluator and the educator. The educator's signature shall not be evidence that the educator agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. 3. The educator shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have their response attached to the evaluation report placed in the educator's personnel file. 4. The following statements are in accordance with compliance with Framework of the Ohio Department of Education (ODE): a. Educators with “Most Effective” rating for student growth will develop a professional growth plan and may choose their credentialed evaluator (within their building) for their evaluation cycle. b. Educators with “Average” and “Above Average” rating for student growth will develop a professional growth plan collaboratively with the evaluator and will have input on their credentialed evaluator for the evaluation cycle. c. Educators with “Approaching Average” and “Least Effective” rating for student growth will develop an improvement plan with their credentialed evaluator. The administrator will assign the credentialed evaluator for the evaluation cycle and approve the improvement plan.

Completion of Evaluation Process. The performance evaluation of a member shall acknowledge the performance strengths of the member evaluated as well as performance deficiencies, if any. The evaluator shall note the data used to support the conclusions reached in the Final Summative Rating Form. The Final Summative Rating Form shall be signed by the evaluator. The Final Summative Rating Form should then be signed by the member to indicate that the member and evaluator have discussed the Final Summative Rating, but the member's signature should not be construed as evidence the member agrees with the contents of the Final Summative Rating. The Final Summative Form shall be completed by May 10.