Description and background. In January 2003, a Liaison Task Force was formed including all NPCC members as well as PJM to develop ways to improve the coordination of planning for the Northeast region. In December 2003 the ISOs achieved agreement on a draft protocol for the coordination of planning in the Northeast region. During the first quarter of 2004, ISO-NE, XXXXX and PJM solicited stakeholder input which was generally supportive of moving ahead with the protocol.
Description and background. The Regional Resource Adequacy Model (RAM) Working Group (formerly the JCAG Working Group) was set up to develop longer-range UCAP markets in NY, PJM and ISO-NE than currently exist. The RAM Working Group developed initial recommendations in mid-2002. The work plan was reassessed in light of the SMD NOPR and the ISOs/RTOs filed joint comments addressing resource adequacy on January 10, 2003. The comments described a central market-based resource adequacy framework, which is consistent with the goals of the SMD NOPR. XXXX was selected to analyze the proposed central resource adequacy market design, and presented their final report at the February 26 regional RAM meeting. A NYISO status report was filed with FERC on February 27, 2004. The broad range of concerns raised by stakeholder groups in each ISO/RTO make it unlikely that all of the ISO/RTOs will adopt the RAM proposal as it is currently formulated. It is anticipated that this effort may lead, instead, to enhancements in the capacity markets in each region. In enhancing their existing markets, the ISO/RTOs have committed to maintain the same product (UCAP) to enable trade between regions to occur and to identify and remove any remaining barriers to the trading of capacity between regions. Each region has Resource Adequacy/ICAP working groups looking at this issue. No plans have yet been established as yet to change the markets in any of the ISOs. The NYISO has submitted a hybrid proposal to its stakeholders for consideration which incorporates a forward capacity market for procurement of a portion of its future resource requirements.
Description and background. The elimination of export fees between ISO/RTO regions is an important objective of the FERC. The NYISO and ISO-NE have been working with their TOs and state regulators to accomplish this goal. During mid-2003, the NYISO and the New York transmission owners developed principles for the elimination of export charges from the New York Control Area, subject to reciprocity. The New England transmission owners included similar provisions in the RTO-NE filing with FERC on October 31, 2003. On March 24, 2004, FERC’s Order on RTO-NE was conditioned on the elimination of export fees between New York and New England by the end of 2004. In April 2004, an agreement in principle was achieved among ISO-NE, the NYISO, New York and NE state regulators calling for the elimination of export fees between the regions on or before December 2004.
Description and background. NYISO and ISO-NE have documented a technical definition of a virtual regional dispatch process and will proceed with further stakeholder meetings to finalize the technical definition and to work towards a joint stakeholder acceptance of the proposal.
Description and background. The Service Manager 7 (SM7) application handles Help Desk tickets which must be resolved by GroceryCo application teams. SM7 is interfaced to the HP system used by HP Help Desk agents taking calls from GroceryCo employees. As HP Agents take calls, tickets are created and then routed to GroceryCo teams for resolution. SM7 also contains information for SOX System Change controls.
Description and background. 2.1 HCA is supporting licensed Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) with mobile medication units (MMUs) that were in operation prior to fiscal year 2024.
2.2 HCA has identified the Contractor as an OTP provider that operated one of the three non- state funded mobile methadone units prior to fiscal year 2024 and is eligible to receive service support subsidies for one MMU under proviso in E.S.S.B. 5950.
2.3 OTP MMUs must meet state and federal requirements in an effort to increase access to treatment for opioid use disorders (OUD), particularly with underserved and vulnerable populations.
2.4 The service support subsidies provided under this contract will assist the Contractor in continueing to fill treatment gaps for Washington State individuals struggling with OUD by providing rapid access to community based OTP services with Contractor’s Mobile Medication Unit #1 serving populations that currently experience barriers accessing treatment.
Description and background. These Terms of Service (“Terms”) are a legal agreement between you, Stride Bank, N.A., and PayForward, LLC governing the use of your PayForward Visa Prepaid Card issued by Stride Bank, N.A., member FDIC (“Prepaid Card”) when used in conjunction with your digital wallet. A digital wallet (“Wallet”) is a service provided by another company (such as Apple Pay, Android Pay, Samsung Pay, etc.), that allows you to use your Card to enter into transactions where the Wallet is accepted. A Wallet may not be accepted at all places where your Prepaid Card is otherwise accepted. You can add or remove your Prepaid Card to/from a Wallet by following the instructions of the Wallet provider. These Terms apply to you and anyone you authorize to use the Wallet. “
Description and background. The Regional Resource Adequacy Model (RAM) Working Group (formerly the JCAG Working Group) was set up to develop longer-range UCAP markets in NY, PJM and ISO-NE than currently exist. The RAM Working Group developed initial recommendations in mid-2002. The work plan was reassessed in light of the SMD NOPR and the ISOs/RTOs filed joint comments addressing resource adequacy on January 10, 2003. The comments described a central market-based resource adequacy framework, which is consistent with the goals of the SMD NOPR. XXXX was selected to analyze the proposed central resource adequacy market design, and presented their final report at the February 26 regional RAM meeting. A NYISO status report was filed with FERC on February 27, 2004. The broad range of concerns raised by stakeholder groups in each ISO/RTO make it unlikely that all of the ISO/RTOs will adopt the RAM proposal as it is currently formulated. It is anticipated that this effort may lead, instead, to enhancements in the capacity markets in each region. In enhancing their existing markets, the ISO/RTOs have committed to maintain the ability to trade the same product (UCAP) between regions and to identify and remove any remaining barriers to the trading of capacity between regions. Each region has Resource Adequacy/ICAP working groups looking at this issue. The NYISO has submitted a hybrid proposal to its stakeholders for consideration which incorporates a forward capacity market for procurement of a portion of its future resource requirements. ISO-NE is currently engaged in an evidentiary hearing process regarding certain aspects of its proposed locational capacity market, and PJM has started work on the development and implementation of a centralized locational capacity market design similar in some respects to the NERA proposal. • Milestones and timetable: ▪ It is expected that the NYISO hybrid proposal will be considered along with RAM and other proposals brought forth by NYISO stakeholders. Although it is unclear what design may finally emerge from this process, a key requirement imposed on the development process is to ensure that any proposal finally accepted is compatible with the New York market. ▪ The NYISO will continue to coordinate its efforts with PJM and ISO-NE and will bring any resulting proposal back to the RAM Group for discussion by July 31, 2005. ▪ On March 1, 2004, ISO-NE filed a locational capacity market with the Commission. The design of this market was based strongly on the...
Description and background. The elimination of export fees between ISO/RTO regions is an important objective of FERC. The NYISO and ISO-NE have been working with their TOs and state regulators to accomplish this goal. During mid- 2003, the NYISO and the New York transmission owners developed principles for the elimination of export charges from the New York Control Area, subject to reciprocity. The New England transmission owners included similar provisions in the RTO-NE filing with FERC on October 31, 2003. On March 24, 2004, FERC’s Order on RTO-NE was conditioned on the elimination of export fees between New York and New England by the end of 2004. In April 2004, an agreement in principle was achieved among ISO-NE, the NYISO, New York and NE state regulators calling for the elimination of export fees between the regions on or before December 2004. • Milestones and Timetable: ▪ ISO-NE made a compliance filing with FERC on June 22, 2004 in which it indicated its commitment to eliminating export fees with NY by December 22, 2004. ▪ On June 21, 2004 and September 30, 2004, respectively, NYISO and the New York Transmission Owners (the “New York Filing Parties”), in Docket No. ER04-943-00, and the New England Power Pool (“NEPOOL”), in Docket No. ER05-3-000, submitted proposed tariff revisions to their respective tariffs, pursuant to section 205 of the FPA, in order to reduce to zero the export fees applicable between their respective regions. ▪ FERC approved the New York Filing Parties’ and XXXXXX’s respective proposals in the Settlement Order, and ISO-NE and the New England Transmission Owners will file conforming changes to the RTO Tariff to implement the proposal for post-RTO Operations Date purposes. ▪ Implementation Date: December 1, 2004 (completed)
Description and background. The elimination of export fees between ISO/RTO regions is an important objective of the FERC. The NYISO and ISO-NE have been working with their TOs and state regulators to accomplish this goal. During mid-2003, the NYISO and the New York transmission owners developed principles for the eliminatio n of export charges from the New York Control Area, subject to reciprocity. The New England transmission owners included similar provisions in the RTO-NE filing with FERC on October 31, 2003. On March 24, 2004, FERC’s Order on RTO-NE was conditioned on the elimination of export fees between New York and New England by the end of 2004. In April 2004, an agreement in principle was achieved among ISO-NE, the NYISO, New York and NE state regulators calling for the elimination of export fees between the regio ns on or before December 2004. • Milestones and Timetable: ▪ ISO-NE will make a compliance filing with FERC on June 22, 2004 to include a plan for the elimination of export fees with NY by December 22, 2004. ▪ NYISO will file tariff modifications with FERC in June 2004 for the elimination of export fees on transactions to New England, subject to reciprocity, on the same date that FERC approves equivalent tariff provisions for New England eliminating export fees to New York.
