Environmental Evaluation. A. Review the site and develop design guidance through a jurisdictional determination.
Environmental Evaluation. Within ninety (90) days of any change in the Fuel Facility Manager (and the Facility Manager, if the Facility Manager is responsible for the QTA Equipment and Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment), the Operators shall, at their sole cost and expense though the in-coming or out-going Fuel Facility Manager, conduct an Environmental Assessment of the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site and specifically the Fuel Facilities, the QTA Equipment and the Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment to identify, to extent practicable, the nature and extent of any Hazardous Substances, if any, present on the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site since the Pre-Lease Environmental Evaluation or any prior Environmental Assessment pursuant to this Section 19.1.1.
Environmental Evaluation. The Concession Contractor shall be evaluated by Reclamation on its environmental performance under this Concession Contract including, without limitation, compliance with the approved EMP and on the following criteria, as a part of the Safety and Environmental Evaluation element of the Concession Review Program referred to in Section 2.H.:
1. Hazardous wastes are properly identified and managed.
2. An Oil and Hazardous Substance Spill Contingency Plan is in place; all employees are trained in first response procedures; Reclamation and appropriate regulatory authorities are notified of any spill or release of a hazardous substance.
3. A hazardous waste minimization strategy is in place, reporting requirements are met, and progress is being made toward reduction goals.
4. Areas of contamination caused by or attributable to the Concession Contractor are cleaned up to the satisfaction of Reclamation and regulatory authorities.
5. Hazardous material inventories and use records are maintained and provided to Reclamation. Hazardous materials are stored and handled in a manner that minimizes the potential for spill or release.
6. A solid waste minimization strategy is in place, waste generation information is provided to Reclamation, and progress is being made toward waste reduction goals.
7. An affirmative procurement program is in place to ensure that, where available, products containing recycled material or materials that are environmentally preferable are preferentially acquired (Green Procurement).
8. The Concession Contractor will conserve energy and improve energy efficiency of operations being implemented. Every effort will be made to ensure that environmentally safe and sustainable energy sources are used. A program to reduce overall energy consumption is documented and actively pursued.
9. The goals and objectives of the area‟s water conservation program are being met.
10. Prior written approval has been obtained from Reclamation for implementation of any pesticide, herbicide, or vector control action.
Environmental Evaluation. FNI will evaluate the project corridor for regulatory permitting requirements primarily related to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Section 404) and other know permits. This information will be utilized to evaluate the project alignment to minimize regulatory requirements for the project.
3.1 Conduct Pedestrian Survey • FNI’s environmental scientist will conduct a pedestrian survey along the initial trail alignment (including approximately 100 feet on either side of the alignment) project limits to document existing environmental conditions and assess potential environmental impacts. Prior to the site visit, environmental scientists will assemble and review data such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps, and soils data. The presence and locations of waterbodies, including wetlands, potential federally-listed threatened and endangered species habitat, and vegetation cover types will be identified within the project area.
Environmental Evaluation. “Environmental Evaluation” shall mean that limited review of higher-risk operational environmental practices of the Incumbent Companies conducted on behalf of the Port prior to the Commencement Date of the Lease.
Environmental Evaluation. As noted above, the City recently adopted a new General Plan that includes a Program EIR that provides an initial evaluation of the environmental effects of the establishment of the Specific Plan. The Ascent Team approach will be to leverage the analysis in the General Plan EIR to streamline the preparation of this EIR to only focus on environmental issues that are peculiar to the Specific Plan, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The Ascent Team approach would also include development of an environmental checklist for use on subsequent development applications to determine the appropriate exemption or environmental review streamlining process to be used consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 and 15182.
Environmental Evaluation. This scope assumes the intent of the proposed construction activities is to design and construct the proposed improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions of either Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3, Maintenance, Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12, Utility Line Activities, or Nationwide Permit (NWP) 13, Bank Stabilization without requiring the preparation and submittal of a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). If bank stabilization activities will be more than 500 linear feet in length along the bank, the amount of fill will exceed an average of one cubic yard per running foot placed along the bank below the plane of the ordinary high water mark, there will be a discharge into a wetland or other special aquatic site, or if other PCN criteria are met, then the submittal of a PCN to the USACE will be required. If a PCN or other Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE (e.g., Individual Permit) is required for the proposed project, then those services can be provided by ENGINEER as an Additional Service. ENGINEER will render the following professional services, with the development of the Project, as follows:
Environmental Evaluation. An ecological assessment consisting of:
(1) Identification of sensitive environments and rare, threatened, or endangered species and their habitats; and
(2) As appropriate, ecological investigations to assess the actual or potential effects on the environment and/or develop remediation criteria.
Environmental Evaluation. In terms of environmental impact, the automatic in-situ consolidation of thermoplastic materials manufacturing process represents an alternative, very beneficial in terms environmental sustainability, to autoclave manufacturing processes (low environmentally optimized), and involve significant advantages in terms of environmental sustainability Continuing with the approach set out in the D1.1 technical report ref[4], has been tested the substantial benefits in terms of composite and ancillary material wastes, energy saving, natural resources outcome and recyclability. In addition this processing methodology allows complying with legal requirements. In addition, thermoplastics can be remolded and recycled directly by remelting heating up above a specific temperature, without negatively affecting the material’s physical properties. This characteristic allows, by one hand, to increase the lifetime of the product, thanks to the ability to reprocess and repair some defective parts, and by other, recycling the end life structure. An impact assessment has been performed by comparison between TS ATL+AC and TP ISC achieving the following results on a unitary 1000x1000 mm Omega-stiffened flat panel, a simplification of a representative typical A/C structure: By means of a standardized and structured analysis has been demonstrated that ISC process can be considered to be eco-friendly and green, above all, in terms of energies, wastes, and materials. Current and future waste management and environmental legislations require all materials to be properly recovered and recycled. Potential advantages for the aerospace sector, as we have seen, lie in the lower energy and auxiliary materials consumption, the possibility of recycling, and longer live cycle. · Decreasing energy consumption · Reduce waste · Material intakes · Increasing the potential recyclability (prepreg and final structure) · Increasing the lifetime of the structure (reprocessing and reparability) · Complexity of process (high temperature)
Environmental Evaluation. The ENGINEER will provide environmental services as described below:
A. Environmental Site Visit and Memorandum Preparation: Xxxxxx-Xxxx will review readily available GIS databases to determine listed species known in the area or those species that could potentially occur on the project site or immediate vicinity. This will also include a review of the existing land use/land cover as mapped by SWFWMD and the existing soil survey. Following this review, a site visit will be conducted to determine if listed species or their habitat are located within the project limits. During the site visit, the road right-of-way and right-of-way to be acquired will be surveyed for the entire ±1.55-mile corridor, which is considered the project limits. Habitats will be mapped, including wetlands (if any), within the project limits to determine if the project will have any direct or secondary impacts on wetlands or surface waters. An Environmental Memorandum will be prepared summarizing the results of the database research and the site visit. A location map, soils map, land cover map and species map (if applicable) will be prepared. This scope excludes detailed listed species surveys. If during field reconnaissance it is determined that additional species-specific surveys are required to meet the state and federal survey protocol, the BOARD will be notified and a cost for the additional survey will be prepared.
