Environmental Evaluation. A. Review the site and develop design guidance through a jurisdictional determination.
Environmental Evaluation. Within ninety (90) days of any change in the Fuel Facility Manager (and the Facility Manager, if the Facility Manager is responsible for the QTA Equipment and Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment), the Operators shall, at their sole cost and expense though the in-coming or out-going Fuel Facility Manager, conduct an Environmental Assessment of the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site and specifically the Fuel Facilities, the QTA Equipment and the Operator Vehicle Maintenance Equipment to identify, to extent practicable, the nature and extent of any Hazardous Substances, if any, present on the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site since the Pre-Lease Environmental Evaluation or any prior Environmental Assessment pursuant to this Section 19.1.1.3. Prior to conducting the Environmental Assessment, the Operators shall consult with the Port in the preparation of an assessment plan or plans, and shall submit the plan to the Port no less than thirty (30) days prior to the initiation of the plan(s). The Port shall have fourteen (14) days after submittal of a plan to review and approve or disapprove the plan, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The results of the plan(s) will be compiled in a report and shall set forth any change in the environmental condition of the Consolidated Rental Car Facility Site since the Pre-Lease Environmental Condition or any prior evaluation pursuant to this Section 19.1.1.3. Any contamination identified shall be subject to remediation as more particularly set forth in ARTICLE 18 and this ARTICLE 19.
Environmental Evaluation. The Concession Contractor shall be evaluated by Reclamation on its environmental performance under this Concession Contract including, without limitation, compliance with the approved EMP and on the following criteria.
Environmental Evaluation. The environmental information developed in tasks 4.1 and 4.2 will inform a meeting with WSDOT Local Programs to introduce the project and discuss the NEPA actions needed to advance the project from TSL to final design and permitting. Specific activities will include: • Conduct an early NEPA scoping meeting with WSDOT Local Programs to review the project and discuss whether it will qualify for a Categorical Exclusion or would an additional environmental review be warranted. This meeting would occur after sufficient project details and potential environmental impacts have been identified. The WSDOT preliminary review findings will be included in the TSL document. • Review project documents from other disciplines under this scope and prepare summary project information to include: • Exhibit and associated summary narrative indicating the proposed project action and the location and extent of potential environmental impacts. The narrative will provide environmental considerations for other disciplines to consider in making TS&L decisions. • List the known and anticipated future documentation necessary to complete a final NEPA review and obtain environmental permits to support project construction. This information will include the list of anticipated permits and the actions and future documentation needed (outside of this scope) to complete the environmental review and permitting process. • Specific environmental elements anticipated under this scope of services include: o Endangered species preliminary evaluation (relevant to stormwater discharges) o Cultural and Historic Structural Resources Assessment o Hazardous Materials and contaminated site evaluation o Visual impacts preliminary evaluation o Land use compatibility and encumbrance o Preliminary noise, vibration, and air quality impacts evaluation o 4(f)/6(f) preliminary risk evaluation of parkland impacts o Critical Areas reconnaissance, delineation, and preliminary impacts evaluation (if any) o Potential impacts and mitigation summary o Environmental Justice impacts preliminary evaluation o Shoreline Management Act preliminary evaluation • Permitting requirements, lead agencies, permitting schedule, possible mitigation requirements, and other permit commitments anticipated for the design and construction of the new bridge. • Two meetings with the AGENCY and project team to discuss the environmental evaluation and potential impacts. • One meeting with WSDOT local programs, including one preparatory sess...
Environmental Evaluation. “Environmental Evaluation” shall mean that limited review of higher-risk operational environmental practices of the Incumbent Companies conducted on behalf of the Port prior to the Commencement Date of the Lease.
Environmental Evaluation. This scope assumes the intent of the proposed construction activities is to design and construct the proposed improvements in accordance with the terms and conditions of either Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3, Maintenance, Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12, Utility Line Activities, or Nationwide Permit (NWP) 13, Bank Stabilization without requiring the preparation and submittal of a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). If bank stabilization activities will be more than 500 linear feet in length along the bank, the amount of fill will exceed an average of one cubic yard per running foot placed along the bank below the plane of the ordinary high water mark, there will be a discharge into a wetland or other special aquatic site, or if other PCN criteria are met, then the submittal of a PCN to the USACE will be required. If a PCN or other Section 404 permit authorization from the USACE (e.g., Individual Permit) is required for the proposed project, then those services can be provided by ENGINEER as an Additional Service. ENGINEER will render the following professional services, with the development of the Project, as follows:
Environmental Evaluation. PBS will identify and map the extent of wetlands within the project area and collect enough information to accurately rate the wetlands using the Washington Department of Ecology’s Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Wetland boundaries will be recorded in the field using mapping grade GPS receiver with +/‐ 3 feet of accuracy. The Ordinary High‐Water Mark (OHWM) of the unnamed tributary to the East Fork Xxxxx River will be identified and flagged in the field for subsequent survey. • A brief memorandum that details the results of the field work and summarizes the mapped resources and buffers will be completed. A graphic containing the extents and appropriate buffers from these features will be developed. Digital files of the mapped resources and buffers will be supplied to the engineering team for use in preliminary design and alternative analysis. Deliverables • Mapped wetlands and OHWM • Critical area summarization memo and graphic • Digital boundaries for wetlands, OHWM, and buffers • Consultation as needed with engineering staff regarding potential impacts / mitigation permitting
Environmental Evaluation. An ecological assessment consisting of:
Environmental Evaluation. In terms of environmental impact, the automatic in-situ consolidation of thermoplastic materials manufacturing process represents an alternative, very beneficial in terms environmental sustainability, to autoclave manufacturing processes (low environmentally optimized), and involve significant advantages in terms of environmental sustainability Continuing with the approach set out in the D1.1 technical report ref[4], has been tested the substantial benefits in terms of composite and ancillary material wastes, energy saving, natural resources outcome and recyclability. In addition this processing methodology allows complying with legal requirements. In addition, thermoplastics can be remolded and recycled directly by remelting heating up above a specific temperature, without negatively affecting the material’s physical properties. This characteristic allows, by one hand, to increase the lifetime of the product, thanks to the ability to reprocess and repair some defective parts, and by other, recycling the end life structure. An impact assessment has been performed by comparison between TS ATL+AC and TP ISC achieving the following results on a unitary 1000x1000 mm Omega-stiffened flat panel, a simplification of a representative typical A/C structure: Figure 13: Environmental benefits Figure 14: Impact benchmarking (TP ISC vs TS Autoclave) By means of a standardized and structured analysis has been demonstrated that ISC process can be considered to be eco-friendly and green, above all, in terms of energies, wastes, and materials. Current and future waste management and environmental legislations require all materials to be properly recovered and recycled. Potential advantages for the aerospace sector, as we have seen, lie in the lower energy and auxiliary materials consumption, the possibility of recycling, and longer live cycle. · Decreasing energy consumption · Reduce waste · Material intakes · Increasing the potential recyclability (prepreg and final structure) · Increasing the lifetime of the structure (reprocessing and reparability) POSITIVES · Complexity of process (high temperature)
Environmental Evaluation. Great American has completed an environmental evaluation of the Xxxxx Mine and accepts the Xxxxx Mine in its current environmental condition. In the event Great American exercises its Option, Great American shall assume all of Xxxxx' environmental reclamation and clean-up liabilities which are not covered by the Vista Lease, including environmental conditions that pre-dates the Effective Date of this Agreement. Great American shall reclaim any disturbance, including drilling, created by its activities under this Agreement in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the appropriate state and federal agencies.
