Evaluation of Program. The parties agree to meet six months after the implementation of this Agreement to assess any concerns relevant to employees working at their residence such as availability of laptop computers.
Evaluation of Program. This Coverage Program will remain in effect and may periodically be reviewed at the request of either party.
Evaluation of Program. The decision to continue, modify or end the program is left to the Superintendent or designee.
Evaluation of Program. The Emergency Department Coverage Program will remain in effect and may periodically be reviewed at the request of either party.
Evaluation of Program. The parties shall meet at least yearly to review the program guidelines and the existing job sharing agreements and to discuss the successfulness of the program and any problems or clarifications which need to be addressed. The parties agree that the job sharing committee shall be the exclusive forum for addressing any questions, concerns or disputes regarding the program guidelines. The implementation or interpretation of the job sharing program shall not be subject to the grievance procedure; however, this shall not abrogate the parties’ rights contained in the collective bargaining agreement.
Evaluation of Program. A committee of PEA leadership, CAP instructors and administrators will meet at the end of each semester to review the program.
Evaluation of Program. The parties shall meet at least yearly to review the program guidelines and the existing job sharing agreements and to discuss the successfulness of the program and any problems or clarifications which need to be addressed. The parties agree that the job sharing committee shall be the exclusive forum for addressing any questions, concerns or disputes regarding the program guidelines. The implementation or interpretation of the job sharing program shall not be subject to the grievance procedure; however, this shall not abrogate the parties’ rights contained in the collective bargaining agreement.
1. The parties will meet monthly to discuss all grievances on which arbitration is demanded. The purposes of such meeting are: (a) to categorize grievances in accordance with this agreement; (b) to schedule grievances for hearing dates in accordance to this agreement; and (c) to resolve matters that can be resolved. Participants in the meeting will be chosen by the parties to maximize the likelihood of achieving the purposes of the meeting.
2. Using the panel of arbitrators set forth in the CBA, the parties will schedule at least eight (8) dates per year on a rolling basis at least 90 days in advance. The intention is to use all those dates if possible unless no matters are pending. The further intention of the processes set forth in this agreement is to eliminate if possible, and if not to minimize, the number of paid arbitration days which are not used by the parties as a result of settlements occurring within the cancellation penalty period.
3. All things being equal, the parties will schedule matters for hearing in the order in which arbitration is demanded. However, the parties recognize that all things will often not be equal. For that reason, some matters are assigned categorical priority as set forth below. In addition, each party may choose up to three (3) matters per year to be given prime or expedited priority regardless of their category or nature. Finally, certain matters will be assigned to the “fill-in” category at the parties’ monthly meeting. The priorities are from lowest to highest:
a. Matters in which there is no alleged ongoing harm to either party, and which can be prepared for hearing with little advance notice. [Example: A layoff alleged to be out of order, member already recalled, few facts in dispute.] These matters will be assigned by the parties to the “fill-in list” which will be used to cover arbitration dates available from late settl...
Evaluation of Program. The parties shall meet at least yearly to review the program guidelines and the existing job sharing agreements and to discuss the successfulness of the program and any problems or clarifications which need to be addressed. The parties agree that the job sharing committee shall be the exclusive forum for addressing any questions, concerns or disputes regarding the program guidelines. The implementation or interpretation of the job sharing program shall not be subject to the grievance procedure; however, this shall not abrogate the parties' rights contained in the collective bargaining agreement. The State and the Union agree that it is in the parties’ mutual interests to address and resolve grievances as expeditiously as possible. The undersigned parties agree, therefore, as follows:
1. A committee shall be empaneled consisting of a Union Representative, a Representative from the Office of Labor Relations, and an Agency Representative whose pending cases are subject to Committee review and discussion.
2. The State and the Union shall develop a list of not less than five (5) grievances one week before the meeting that the parties intend to review and discuss.
3. Said Committee shall meet at least twice quarterly to review and make recommendations regarding the disposition of the grievances pending currently at the arbitration step of the grievance process. The parties will meet in December of each year to set expected dates for such meetings. By mutual agreement, the parties may hold additional meetings to address a grievance backlog.
4. The Union, OLR, and Agency Representative must possess the authority to act upon said pending cases during the meeting. Only those persons necessary for bringing the matter to resolution need to attend.
5. It is understood and agreed that any resolution of said grievances must be immediately reduced to writing when possible and executed by the State and the Union using an agreed upon form. Otherwise, girevances shall be scheduled for arbitration in the order in which arbitration is demanded except that cases that involve overpayments or that pose an ongoing monetary liability to the State will have scheduling priority by order of filing. Notwithstanding, either party may choose up to five (5) matters per year to be given prime or expedited priority.
6. No grievance shall be ripe for Committee review unless and until either (1) it has been heard and answered at Step 2 of the grievance procedure; (2) it has been filed at Step...
Evaluation of Program. The parties shall meet at least yearly to review the program guidelines and existing job sharing agreements and to discuss the successfulness of the program and any problems or clarifications which need to be addressed. The parties agree that the job sharing committee shall be the exclusive forum for addressing any questions, concerns or disputes regarding the program guidelines. The implementation or interpretation of the job sharing program shall not be subject to the grievance procedure; however, this shall not abrogate the parties’ rights contained in the collective bargaining agreement.
1. The implementation of language changes will be done on a prospective basis after legislative approval has been granted pursuant to Section 5-278 of the Connecticut General Statutes or as otherwise provided by said Section, and if any grievances are filed alleging retroactive application, they shall be considered without merit and shall not he pursued by the Union. The above shall not apply if the contract contains a specific effective date for a specific change or benefit (e.g., salary increase).
2. The deletion of the Grandparent Clause contained in Article 43, Section Eight of the 1982-1985 Agreement shall not be interpreted to affect any employee who may have qualified for its provisions; however, the reference to Step eleven (11) would be adjusted to reflect the implementation of the September 1986 Teacher pay plans, the Enhancement Act negotiations of 1987, and any subsequent negotiations.
Evaluation of Program. At the end of the Program, Xxxxx will prepare an evaluation report summarizing services provided with supporting data as to the effectiveness of those services.
