Evaluation of Quotations. Offers determined to be substantially responsive to the Technical Specifications will be evaluated by comparison of the total price at final destination as per paragraph 7 (i) above. In evaluating the quotations, the Purchaser will determine for each quotation the evaluated price by adjusting the price quotation by making any correction for any arithmetical errors as follows:
Evaluation of Quotations. IOM shall evaluate and compare the Quotations on the basis of the following:
Evaluation of Quotations. S3.2.1 Quotations received will be evaluated based on the following or as advised within the Work Order Quotation:
Evaluation of Quotations. The Employer will evaluate and compare the quotations determined to be substantially responsive i.e. which (a) meet the qualification criteria specified in clause 3 above (b) are properly signed and (c) conform to the terms and conditions, specifications and drawings without material deviations.
Evaluation of Quotations. The evaluation of quotations will be conducted using the procedure set out below:
Evaluation of Quotations. IOM shall evaluate and compare the Quotations on the basis of the following: Compliance with technical specifications including delivery requirement Price Arithmetical errors will be corrected on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail, and the total price shall be corrected. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, its Quotation will be rejected. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the amount in words will prevail.
Evaluation of Quotations. IOM shall conduct a technical and financial evaluation of the offers per location:
Evaluation of Quotations. The Client will evaluate and compare the quotations determined to be substantially responsive i.e. which
Evaluation of Quotations. (a) DFAT will evaluate Quotations on the basis of best value for money consistent with Commonwealth procurement policy. Neither the lowest priced quotation nor any quotation will necessarily be accepted by DFAT.
Evaluation of Quotations. The government may award one (1) firm fixed-price Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) to the responsible Offeror whose quotation that conforms to the RFQ, will be most advantageous to the government, price and other price factors considered, such that it provides the best value to the government. Best value is defined as the procurement process that results in the most advantageous acquisition decision for the government that is performed through an integrated assessment and trade-off analysis between price and non-price factors. Under best value procurement, the NTSB may reasonably determine that the superior solution/approach merits a higher price and therefore, represents the best value to the government, or the NTSB may reasonably determine that the Offeror with other than the highest rating in non-price factors is the best value. The government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in quotations. The government reserves the right to award without discussions. Offerors are cautioned that they must submit a best offer with the initial quotation. The government reserves the right to reject any or all quotations if such action is in the public interest. In addition, the government may reject or deem a quotation as nonresponsive as described in Section L – Quotation Instructions. Rejected and nonresponsive quotations will be deemed ineligible for award and will not be evaluated. Offerors that do not send samples, if requested by the NTSB, to support their quotation as described in Section L and the SOW, may be deemed nonresponsive.
