Evaluation of Technical Bids Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Technical Bids. 3.1.1 The Authority shall open the BIDs received online after as per the Schedule of Bidding in Clause 1.3 herein above at the place specified in Clause 2.11.4 (i); and in the presence of the Bidders who choose to attend. The Authority shall prepare minutes of the BID opening, including information disclosed to those present at the time of the BID opening. 3.1.2 Technical Bids of those Bidders, who have not submitted their Bid online, shall not be considered for opening and evaluation. 3.1.3 If any information furnished by the Bidder is found to be incomplete, or contained in formats other than those specified herein, the Authority may, in its sole discretion, exclude the relevant information for consideration of eligibility and qualification of the Bidder. 3.1.4 To facilitate the evaluation of Technical BIDs, the Authority may, at its sole discretion, seek clarifications in writing from any Bidder regarding its Technical BID. Such clarification(s) shall be provided within the time specified by the Authority for this purpose. Any request for clarification(s) and all clarification(s) in response thereto shall be in writing. The bids will be examined and evaluated in accordance with the provisions set out in Section 3. The Authority will subsequently flag issues, if any with the data updated by the Bidders. 3.1.5 If a Bidder does not provide clarifications sought under Clause 3.1.4 above within the prescribed time, its Bid may be liable to be rejected. In case the Bid is not rejected, the Authority may proceed to evaluate the Bid by construing the particulars requiring clarification to the best of its understanding, and the Bidder shall be barred from subsequently questioning such interpretation of the Authority.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of Technical Bids. Assessment of adequacy of Technical Proposal with Requirements:
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of Technical Bids. 20.1 Purchaser shall evaluate the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are generally in order. 20.2 The Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each bid to the Bid Document. For the purposes of these clauses, a substantially responsive bid is one which confirms to all the terms and conditions of the Bid Documents without material deviations. The purchaser‟s determination of bid‟s responsiveness shall be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. 20.3 A bid, determined as substantially non-responsive will be rejected by the purchaser and shall not subsequent to the bid opening be made responsive by the bidder by correction of the non- conformity. 20.4 The Purchaser may waive any minor infirmity or non-conformity or irregularity in a bid which doesn‟t constitute a material deviation, provided such waiver doesn‟t prejudice or affect the relative ranking of any bidder.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Technical Bids. Technical bid documentation shall be evaluated in two sub-steps. a. Firstly, the documentation furnished by the vendor will be examined prima facie to see if the offer made, technical skill base and financial capacity and other vendor attributes claimed therein are consistent with the needs of this project. b. In the second step, TSTSL may ask vendor(s) for additional information, visit to vendors site and/or arrange discussions with their professional, technical faculties to verify claims made in technical bid documentation.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Technical Bids. Submission of Essential Documents (For Technical Bid Evaluation): The following documents must be enclosed with the Tender form for technical evaluation of the bids: (i) The bidder should be based at Delhi/NCR (registered office or branch office). (ii) The bidder should have continuous experience during the last EIGHT years in the field of providing such services (housekeeping & catering) in Central Govt. establishments/Autonomous bodies of Govt. of India/ Corporations of Govt. of India/reputed public organizations. A certificate to this effect shall be enclosed by the bidder in tabular form. Cutoff date for calculation experience will be 31.03.2018. (iii) The bidder (Proprietor/ Director/ owner) should possess a degree or diploma in Catering/Hotel management from a reputed institute. Copy shall be enclosed by the bidder. (iv) The bidder should have provided / have been providing continuous satisfactory services in an establishment having a minimum of 70 rooms and capacity to accommodate 125 guests at a time for at least three years during last FIVE years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18. A certificate along with copies of the work orders shall be enclosed by the bidder. (v) The bidder should have an experience of providing catering services involving very high dignitaries (including Hon’ble Prime Minister and/or Hon’ble President of India) and foreign delegates. Experience certificate stating clearly about this may be closed. (vi) The bidder should have completed one single work/ services of Catering and Housekeeping of contract value not less than 250 Lakhs during the last three financial year (i.e. 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18) OR two similar works/ services of not less than 150 Lakhs each during the last three financial year (i.e. 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18). Certificate along with the copy of the work order shall be enclosed by the bidder. (vii) Registration certificate of the firm under the Shop & Establishment Act of the Govt. of NCT Delhi or any other recognized authority of the government. Copy shall be enclosed by the bidder. (viii) Minimum turnover of the firm not less than Rs. 5.00 Crore (Rupees Five Crore) during last three financial years (2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18). Certified Profit & Loss Account and Balance Sheet of the firm for last three years (2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18) to be provided duly attested by the chartered accountant in Housekeeping & Catering Services. (ix) Duly certified copies of the satisfactory servic...
Sample 1
Evaluation of Technical Bids. The Employer will carry out a detailed technical evaluation of the Bids not previously rejected as being substantially nonresponsive, to determine whether the technical aspects are in compliance with the Bidding Document. The Bid that does not meet minimum acceptable standards of completeness, consistency, and detail, and the specified minimum and/or maximum requirements for specified functional guarantees, will be treated as nonresponsive and hence rejected. To reach such a determination, the Employer will examine and compare the technical aspects of the bids on the basis of the information supplied by the Bidders, taking into account the following:
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Technical Bids

  • EVALUATION OF BIDS i) Bids submitted by the tenderer will be opened first and evaluated for fulfilling the Pre-qualification criteria and other conditions in NIT/Tender documents, based on documentary evidence submitted along with the offer. ii) In case the same qualifying experience is claimed by more than one agency, then the agency who has executed the Tender as per documentary evidence submitted shall only be qualified. Further, XXXX reserves the right to ask for further proofs including submission of TDS certificates for the said job. iii) In case the qualifying experience is claimed by private organizations based on Purchase Order and completion certificates from another private organization, IIDL reserves the right to ask for further proofs including submission of TDS certificates for the said job. iv) Assessing Bidder capacity for executing the current tender shall be as per Notice inviting Tender. v) Price bids of shortlisted bidders shall only be opened through conventional price bid opening. vi) Price bids of unqualified bidders shall not be opened.

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Inspection of Goods 8.1 The Buyer shall inspect the goods upon delivery. 8.2 Where goods are damaged the Buyer shall notify the Supplier. The Buyer may reject the damaged goods and the following provisions shall apply: 8.2.1 the Supplier shall collect the damaged goods from the Buyer at the Supplier’s expense; 8.2.2 during the period between delivery of the goods to the Buyer and collection by the Supplier, the Buyer shall not be liable for any loss or further damage caused to the damaged goods; 8.2.3 all sums payable by the Buyer in relation to the damaged goods shall cease to become payable; 8.2.4 all sums paid by the Buyer in relation to the damaged goods shall be repaid by the Supplier immediately; 8.2.5 the Buyer shall be entitled to claim damages from the Supplier for any losses caused to the Buyer as a result of the goods being damaged. 8.3 Where there are shortages in the order the Buyer shall notify the Supplier and the following provisions shall apply: 8.3.1 all sums payable by the Buyer in relation to the missing goods shall cease to become payable; 8.3.2 all sums paid by the Buyer in relation to the missing goods shall be repaid by the Supplier immediately; 8.3.3 the Buyer shall be entitled to claim damages from the Supplier for any losses caused to the Buyer as a result of the shortages. 8.4 If the Buyer so requests, the Supplier shall immediately replace damaged goods or supply goods which are missing at the Supplier’s expense or the Buyer shall be entitled to cancel, without notice, the whole or any unexecuted part of the order and the rights referred to in Clause 5.2 shall apply. 8.5 Where there is an excess of goods in relation to the order the Buyer may reject the excess goods by notice in writing to the Supplier and the following provisions shall apply: 8.5.1 the Supplier shall collect the excess goods from the Buyer at the Supplier’s expense; 8.5.2 during the period between delivery of the goods and collection by the Supplier, the Buyer shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the excess goods; 8.5.3 no sum shall be due to the Supplier for the excess goods and in the event that sums are paid to the Supplier for the excess goods, the Supplier shall repay such sums to the Buyer immediately. 8.6 The Buyer may accept excess goods by notifying the Supplier of such acceptance and the price of the excess goods shall be payable by the Buyer. 8.7 The Supplier shall repair or replace free of charge, goods damaged or lost in transit upon receiving notice to that effect from the Buyer. 8.8 The Buyer’s signature on any delivery note of the Supplier is evidence of the number of packages received only and not evidence of the correct quantity of goods received or that the goods are in a good condition or of the correct quality.

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22 2.24.2 The tender evaluation committee shall evaluate the tender within 30 days of the validity period from the date of opening the tender. 2.24.3 A tenderer who gives false information in the tender document about its qualification or who refuses to enter into a contract after notification of contract award shall be considered for debarment from participating in future public procurement.

  • Technical Foreign Affairs Training for professional skills of a specialized nature in the methods and techniques of such fields as foreign languages, foreign culture, intelligence (foreign affairs/intelligence), diplomacy, or strategic studies. Technical

  • EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS 29.1 The Employer will evaluate and compare only the Bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clause 26. 29.2 In evaluating the Bids, the Employer will determine for each Bid the evaluated Bid Price by adjusting the Bid Price as follows: (a) Making any correction for errors pursuant to Clause 27; or (b) Making an appropriate adjustments for any other acceptable variations, deviations; and (c) Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with Sub Clause 22.5. 29.3 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Bidding documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Employer shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.4 The estimated effect of the price adjustment conditions under Clause 47 of the Conditions of Contract, during the period of implementation of the Contract, will not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.5 If the Bid of the successful Bidder is seriously unbalanced in relation to the Engineer’s estimate of the cost of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the Bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bill of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the performance security set forth in Clause 34 be increased at the expense of the successful Bidder to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of default of the successful Bidder under the Contract. 30. (Deleted)

  • Submission of Grievances A. Any employee or group of employees shall have the right to present a grievance. No employee or group of employees shall be hindered from or disciplined for exercising this right. B. If any two (2) or more employees have essentially the same grievance they may, and if requested by the County must, collectively present and pursue their grievance if they report to the same immediate supervisor. C. If the grievant is a group of more than three (3) employees, the group shall, at the request of the County, appoint one (1) or two (2) employees to speak for the collective group. To be considered a grievant in a group grievance, each employee must be individually identified as a grievant when the grievance is submitted at Step 2.