We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Evaluation Version Sample Clauses

Evaluation Version. If Customer has not placed an Order with Functionize for the commercial version of the Functionize Solution or an Order specifies that Customer only has rights to an Evaluation Version, then Customer’s use of the Functionize Solution shall be for evaluation purposes only (“Evaluation Version”), and Customer acknowledges and agrees that Customer will only access and use the Functionize Solution solely for Customer’s internal evaluation purposes to assess the capabilities of the Functionize Solution against their requirements in determining whether to license the commercial version of the Functionize Solution. All use of the Evaluation Version of the Functionize Solution must be in a non-production, non-commercial environment and not for general production use, subject to any additional limitations or restrictions provided by Functionize in writing when providing Customer with access to the Evaluation Version. Customer’s right to use such Evaluation Version shall only be for the duration of the Evaluation Period set forth in the applicable Order or if no such period is specified, fourteen (14) days (together with any extension of the Evaluation Period that may be expressly authorized by Functionize in writing). In addition and notwithstanding any other provision of these Terms of Service, Customer acknowledges and agrees that (i) the Evaluation Version of the Functionize Solution is provided to Customer “AS-IS,” with no warranties of any kind; (ii) Functionize shall have no indemnification obligations for the Evaluation Version; (iii) Functionize may terminate immediately in the event Functionize has reasonably determined that Customer has committed a breach of Section 2; and (iv) for Evaluation Versions provided to Customer for free, in addition to the termination rights under Section 6, either party may terminate the Evaluation Version license with or without cause effective ten (10) days after giving written notice of termination to the other party. Customer agrees to only provide simulation or historical Customer Data to the Evaluation Version of the Hosted Service, and no data related to current testing activities of Customer’s products or business. CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL CUSTOMER DATA UPLOADED TO OR STORED IN THE EVALUATION VERSION OF THE FUNCTIONIZE SOLUTION DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD WILL BE PERMANENTLY LOST IF CUSTOMER HAS NOT ENTERED INTO AN ORDER FOR THE COMMERCIAL VERSION OF THE FUNCTIONIZE SOLUTION WITH FUNCTIONIZE BEFORE EXPIRATION OF...
Evaluation VersionA copy of a HyperSpace Product in the form of run-time/executable images only (and specifically excluding the Source Materials) distributed at no cost to a prospective Licensee for the purposes of allowing such prospective Licensee the opportunity to evaluate such HyperSpace Product to determine whether to purchase such HyperSpace Product. Each Evaluation Version of a HyperSpace Product contains Time-Based Deactivation Functions.
Evaluation Version. If this License is for an evaluation version, you are authorized to use the Software only for evaluation purposes for a single evaluation period not to exceed 30 days, starting on the day on which you accept this License. Should you require an evaluation period exceeding thirty (30) days, you may contact Software FX, Inc. for an extended evaluation license. Objects produced by Software configured with an evaluation version must contain symbols and text provided by Software FX, Inc. indicating that the object was produced with an evaluation version of the Software. You are not authorized to obtain more than one license for an evaluation version of any Software FX, Inc. Software by subsequent downloads or installations.
Evaluation Version. If this License is for an evaluation version, you are authorized to use the Software only for evaluation purposes for a single evaluation period not to exceed 30 days, starting on the day on which you accept this License. Should you require an evaluation period
Evaluation Version. A trial version of the Software with full functionality which is licensed at no charge and which is not supported by Licensor. This version is licensed for a period of 30 days only, commencing from requesting an evaluation license. On expiry of the ’30 day’ period, this version will revert to a Demo Version of the Software, unless a Full Version is purchased by Licensee prior to or on such expiry.
Evaluation Version. If BlueStripe identifies the Software as a demonstration, evaluation, or trial (“Evaluation Version”), You may Install and Access one copy of the Evaluation Version Software for the purpose of evaluation and demonstration only. This one copy of the Evaluation Version Software may not be Installed at, or Accessed by, a service bureau that You may contract with nor shall You use the Software for the purpose of providing a service bureau, third-party hosting, time-sharing, an application service, or similar services for third parties. Additionally, You may not use it for competitive analysis, or commercial, professional, or other for-profit purposes. The Evaluation Version may only be Installed and Accessed for the evaluation period consistent with the duration of the license key provided by BlueStripe. Use of the Software beyond the applicable Evaluation Version license term (evaluation period), or any attempt to defeat the time-control disabling function in the Software is an unauthorized use and constitutes a material breach of this Agreement and a violation of intellectual property law. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by both Parties, within five (5) days after the evaluation period, You shall return to BlueStripe or destroy, at BlueStripe’s option, all copies of the Software in Your possession or control, including any and all copies made by You and any Documentation. Upon BlueStripe’s request, You will certify in a written document signed by You that all copies of the Software have been returned to BlueStripe, or destroyed, and that no copies of the Software are in Your possession or control. Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14 shall survive termination of this Agreement.
Evaluation VersionThe Evaluation Version is a version of the SOFTWARE that allows CUSTOMER to evaluate the functionality of the SOFTWARE including vTools, for a certain period of time, typically for a maximum of one hundred eighty (180) days. To use vTools, the Evaluation Version requires the online activation of a corresponding Evaluation License File. The SOFTWARE may be installed on any number of computers provided that these devices are controlled by CUSTOMER. CUSTOMER's right to use vTools and to create Derivatives is restricted to the purpose of evaluating the SOFTWARE. The use of vTools is limited to five consecutive minutes and will automatically be terminated thereafter. An Evaluation Version prohibits CUSTOMER to use vTools included in the SOFTWARE for any other purposes than those mentioned in this Section 3.1.3, in particular, without limitation, CUSTOMER must not use SOFTWARE provided as an Evaluation Version for commercial purposes, or use the Evaluation Version to develop commercial applications including vTools. The Evaluation Version may be used only in the time period that is specified in the Evaluation License File. After expiration of this time period, vTools included in the SOFTWARE or used in Derivatives will no longer work.
Evaluation Version. The Software is an early version and has not yet been widely commercially released. It is likely that the Software contains errors. If Licensee is unwilling to accept the risk of such errors, Licensee should not use the Software or sublicense it. Licensee is solely responsible for Licensee’s use of the Software, including sales and sublicenses and Licensee provides Vendor with an indemnity for third-party claims arising from Licensee’s use of and resales of the Software as more fully set forth in Section 7.
Evaluation Version. SeaFEM evaluation version is a fully functional version, except that it has some limitations on the size of the models that can be dealt with. SeaFEM evaluation version can be freely used by USER under the terms of this Agreement. SeaFEM evaluation version can be redistributed provided that it is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

Related to Evaluation Version

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation License If You are licensing the Software for evaluation purposes, Your use of the Software is only permitted in a non-production environment and for the period limited by the License Key. Notwithstanding any other provision in this XXXX, an Evaluation License of the Software is provided “AS-IS” without indemnification, support or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.