Hydrologic Monitoring. Posting of telemetered data on HIC (continual). Posting of non-telemetered data on HIC will occur every 5 weeks. 1 $70,465.20 Table with flow summary statistics for sampled storm and base flow events from 14 stations. 1 $7,790 Subtask Total $78,255.20 1/31/2021
Hydrologic Monitoring. The hydrologic monitoring network shall be comprised of the monitoring sites in Table 1.1 and others to be selected by the TWG. Hydrologic data collection at these sites shall include measurements of groundwater production, depth-to-groundwater, spring discharge, stream flow, and water quality as applicable, or as otherwise agreed to and specified by the TWG. The capital costs of establishing the hydrologic monitoring network shall be shared as stated in Sections 1.1.1 and Table 1.1. Maintenance and operation of these sites shall be performed by the Utah Geological Survey (UGS), SNWA, or a mutually agreed to third party. SNWA and UGS agree to work cooperatively to ensure data is reported in an electronic format agreed to by the TWG.
Hydrologic Monitoring. The USGS expects to continue with monitoring as outlined in the 2011 INL Groundwater Monitoring Plan (U.S. Department of Energy, 2012; (DOE/ID-11034) and will continue to publish reports on hydrologic conditions and the distribution of chemical constituents on a three to four year basis. Data evaluated in the coming year for a water-quality optimization report (table 1) will help determine if changes to the sample program can be accomplished without loss of important information. New xxxxx will continue to be sampled for a large suite of chemical and radiochemical constituents as they are drilled to better understand the ESRP aquifer system. Management tools will be used to increase the efficiency of the long-term water-quality and water-level monitoring network at the INL. The current zones from MLMS xxxxx will continue to be monitoried to establish trends and future reports on pressure, temperature, and water chemistry information will be compiled on a 3 to 4 year basis coinciding with the hydrologic conditions reports. The USGS expects to continue building many different types of 3-D visualization models over the next several years. New paleomagnetic and map information, including that from surface vents outside the INL boundary, flows that come onto the INL site, on the surface and into the subsurface, will be entered into the database to develop models that include data from USGS 142, 143, 144, 145, and 147 along with other new cores, as soon as the information is available. Reports will be completed from the data compiled to reinterpret the stratigraphy of the INL (Table 3). Sediment information will also continue to be entered into databases. These models will help manage the substantial amount of geologic, hydrologic, geophysical, thermal, geochemical, and contaminant data that are currently available; will enhance understanding of contaminant movement in the subsurface; will improve capabilities for long- term monitoring in support of Long-Term Stewardship Plan objectives; and will improve the ability to communicate stewardship issues to concerned stakeholders and to management. Geochemical mass-balance modeling will continue for the next several years and eventually will be incorporated into a reactive-transport model. It is anticipated that geochemical mass-balance modeling will be wrapped up by 2019. The vertical water-quality monitoring network will be expanded as funds allow, and water-quality samples will continue to be collected for the for...
Hydrologic Monitoring. REDMOND has subcontracted with King County to continue the hydrologic monitoring component of the RPWS through Water Year 2019. This involves continuous flow monitoring at 14 stations in seven watersheds. Data from the continuous flow monitoring will be processed to calculate a suite of indicators for evaluating hydrologic impacts from urban development. King County will continue hydrologic monitoring which involves maintenance of the continuous flow monitoring equipment and replacement as needed, telemetry where cell phone coverage is available, maintenance of the automatic processing, and the King County’s Hydrological Information Center (HIC) database on their public website. Xxxxxxx will generate summary statistics (e.g., antecedent dry period, flow at time of sample collection) from the flow record for storm and base flow events that were sampled for water quality under Subtask C1.
Hydrologic Monitoring. The hydrologic monitoring component of the Paired Watershed Study will involve continuous flow monitoring at 14 stations. Data from the continuous flow monitoring will be processed to calculate a suite of indicators for evaluating hydrologic impacts from urban development. King County will take the lead role in implementing the hydrologic monitoring component of the study with support from Xxxxxxx. Xxxxxxx’x involvement will entail the post processing of data compiled by King County to generate summary statistics (e.g., antecedent dry period, flow at time of sample collection) from the flow record for storm and base flow events that were sampled for water quality under Subtask B 2.2. These statistics will be stored in the data management system developed under Subtask B1.1 and presented in the data report described under Subtask B 2.6. These statistics will eventually be used in statistical analyses for trends in water quality that will be performed in later phases of the study. Xxxxxxx will also coordinate with King County to summarize the continuous flow monitoring data for each station for presentation in the data report described in Subtask B 2.6.
Hydrologic Monitoring. Posting of telemetered data on HIC (continual). Posting of non- telemetered data on HIC will occur every 5 weeks. 1 $56,865.95 Equipment maintenance 1 $7,584.17 Table with flow summary statistics for sampled storm and base flow events from 12 stations. 1 $8,080 Subtask Total $72,530.12 3/31/2024 Subtask E2.2 Water Quality Monitoring Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 12 stations X 16 sampling events 16 $126,560 Data validation memorandum 1 $14,100 Subtask Total $140,660 3/31/2024 Subtask E2.3 Sediment Quality Monitoring Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 17 stations 1 $17,500 Data validation memorandum 1 $4,380 Subtask Total $21,880 3/31/2024 Subtask E2.4 Physical Habitat Monitoring Results from physical habitat monitoring at 17 stations that are uploaded to Ecology’s data management system 1 $65,750 Subtask Total $65,750 3/31/2024 Subtask E2.5 Biological Monitoring Laboratory results from macroinvertebrate sample analysis for 17 stations entered into the Puget Sound Stream Benthos database or EIM 1 $15,050 Subtask Total $15,050 3/31/2024 Subtask E2.6 Water Year Data Summary Report Draft data summary report 1 $22,200 6/30/2024 Final data summary report 1 $5,540 9/30/2024 Subtask Total $27,740 Subtask E2.7 Technical Advisory Committee Coordination King County presentation on hydrologic data and report review 1 $3,597.34 Meeting notes documenting discussion items and consensus decisions from the technical advisory committee. 2 $3,800 Subtask Total $7,397.34 6/30/2024 Subtask E2.8 Project Management Monthly progress reports from Xxxxxxx 12 $23,040 Annual progress reports from King County 1 $669.42 Subtask Total $23,709.42 12/31/2023 E2 Task Total $374,716.88 Task E3.0 – Water Year 2024 Study Implementation
Hydrologic Monitoring. Posting of telemetered data on HIC (continual). Posting of non- telemetered data on HIC will occur every 5 weeks. 1 $56,300.76 Equipment maintenance 1 $7,584.16 Table with flow summary statistics for sampled storm and base flow events from 12 stations. 1 $7,850 Subtask Total $71,734.92 3/31/2023 Subtask E1.2 Water Quality Monitoring Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 12 stations X 12 sampling events 12 $93,240 Data validation memorandum 1 $13,800 Subtask Total $107,040 3/31/2023 Subtask E1.3 Biological Monitoring Laboratory results from macroinvertebrate sample analysis for 17 stations entered into the Puget Sound Stream Benthos database or EIM 1 $14,810 Subtask Total $14,810 3/31/2023 Subtask E1.4 Water Year Data Summary Report Draft data summary report 1 $21,500 6/30/2023 Final data summary report 1 $5,390 9/30/2023 Subtask Total $26,890 Subtask E1.7 Technical Advisory Committee Coordination King County presentation on hydrologic data and report review 1 $3,492.56 Meeting notes documenting discussion items and consensus decisions from the technical advisory committee. 2 $3,700 Subtask Total $7,192.56 6/30/2023 Subtask E1.8 Project Management Monthly progress reports from Xxxxxxx 9 $16,740 Annual progress report from King County 1 $649.92 Subtask Total $17,389.92 12/31/2022 E1 Task Total $245,057.40 Task E2.0 – Water Year 2023 Study Implementation
Hydrologic Monitoring. Posting of telemetered data on HIC (continual). Posting of non- telemetered data on HIC will occur every 5 weeks. 1 $74,297.40 Equipment maintenance 1 $12,075 Table with flow summary statistics for sampled storm and base flow events from 12 stations. 1 $9,300 Subtask Total $95,672.40 3/31/2026 Subtask F1.2 Water Quality Monitoring Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 12 stations X 16 sampling events 16 $147,680 Data validation memorandum 1 $16,400 Subtask Total $164,080 3/31/2026 Subtask F1.3 Sediment Quality Monitoring Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 17 stations 1 $20,300 Data validation memorandum 1 $5,080 Subtask Total $25,380 3/31/2026 Subtask F1.4 Physical Habitat Monitoring Results from physical habitat monitoring at 17 stations that are uploaded to Ecology’s data management system 1 $72,900
Hydrologic Monitoring. XXXXXXX has subcontracted with King County to continue the hydrologic monitoring component of the RPWS. This involves continuous flow monitoring at 12 stations. Data from the continuous flow monitoring is processed to calculate a suite of indicators for evaluating hydrologic impacts from urban development. King County will continue hydrologic monitoring which involves maintenance of the continuous flow monitoring equipment and replacement as needed, telemetry where cell phone coverage is available, maintenance of the automatic
Hydrologic Monitoring. Table with flow summary statistics for sampled storm and base flow events from 14 stations 1 $ 105,216 Subtask Total $ 105,216 1/31/2020 Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 14 stations x 16 sampling events 16 $ 128,320 Data validation memorandum 1 $ 31,560 Subtask Total $ 159,880 1/31/2020 Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 19 stations 1 $ 16,200 Data validation memorandum 1 $ 4,060 Subtask Total $ 20,260 1/31/2020 Results from physical habitat monitoring at 19 stations that are uploaded to Ecology’s data management system 1 $ 66,200 Subtask Total $ 66,200 1/31/2020 Laboratory results from macroinvertebrate sample analysis for 19 stations 1 $ 16,900 1/31/2020 Subtask Total $ 16,900 Subtask C1.6 – Water year Data Summary Report Draft data summary report 1 $ 18,100 1/31/2020 Final data summary report 1 $ 4,540 3/31/2020 Subtask Total $ 22,640 Subtask C1.7 – Technical Advisory Committee Coordination Meeting notes documenting discussion items and consensus decisions from the technical advisory committee x 2 meetings 2 $ 5,542 Subtask Total $ 5,542 3/31/2020 Subtask C1.8 – Project Management Compiled progress reports from project team members (12 months) 12 $ 21,109 Subtask Total $ 21,109 3/31/2020 Task Total $ 417,747 Task C2.0 – Water Year 2020 First Quarter Study Implementation Subtask C2.1 – Hydrologic Monitoring Table with flow summary statistics for sampled storm and base flow events from 14 stations 1 $ 27,368 Subtask Total $ 27,368 1/31/2020 Subtask C1.2 – Water Quality Monitoring Laboratory analytical results and documentation of Xxxxxxx audits for 14 stations x 16 sampling events 16 $ 32,640 Subtask Total $ 32,640 1/31/2020 Task Total $ 60,008 Project Total $ 477,755 Contract no. 1500059, Amendment 3 All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement including any Amendments remain in full force and effect, except as expressly provided by this Amendment. This Amendment is signed by persons who represent that they have the authority to execute this Amendment and bind their respective organizations to this Amendment. This Amendment is effective on signature date of ECOLOGY.
