Informing Candidates of the Decision Sample Clauses

Informing Candidates of the Decision a) Informing the candidates of the decision to appoint is strictly the obligation of the individual receiving the recommendation (College President, appropriate Vice President or appropriate Xxxx/Director). All selection committee members must maintain strict confidentiality. b) A verbal offer of appointment must be made to the selected candidate followed as soon as possible by an official offer in writing, before the other candidates are contacted. c) The appointee shall, at the time of being informed by the College President, appropriate Vice President or appropriate Xxxx/Director, be instructed to maintain confidentiality of the offer until his/her acceptance has been received by the College and all non-selected candidates have been advised or the appointment is announced by the College. d) As soon as the selected candidate has accepted the written offer, the unsuccessful candidates shall be informed, preferably verbally, followed by a note of thanks for their interest in applying by the Xxxx or Director.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Informing Candidates of the Decision. Informing the candidates of the decision to appoint is strictly the obligation of the individual receiving the recommendation (College President/appropriate Vice President). All SC members must maintain strict confidentiality. A verbal offer of appointment must be made to the selected candidate followed as soon as possible by an official offer in writing, before the other candidates are contacted. The appointee shall, at the time of being by the College President/appropriate Vice President or delegate, be instructed to maintain confidentiality of the offer until his/her acceptance has been received by the College, and all non-selected candidates have been advised, or the appointment is announced by the College. As soon as the selected candidate has accepted the written offer, the unsuccessful candidates shall be informed, preferably verbally, followed by a note of thanks for their interest in applying. (October Guidelines for the Performance Appraisal of Permanent Regular Instructors , 1 Performance Appraisal Criteria Contribution to Students Each student is treated with demonstrated respect and genuine interest. Instructors evidence an approach to learning designed to reach the of students in the College. Adequate attention is given to the different learning needs of individual students. Students are encouraged to develop an inquiring, critical, and independent attitude, to help each other as appropriate, and not to be unduly dependent on the instructor. Instructors make use of student services and other resource departments as appropriate in order to ensure that adequate attention is paid to the needs of students who are experiencing difficulties in learning. Within the first week of the start of a course or program, instructorsprovide students with written course or program objectives including a description of the course or program content and the method of evaluation to be used. Classroom or other presentations are well prepared, clear, and effective. It is that the College has an obligation, within the constraints of budget, to assist and support instructors regarding professional development in the area of professional competence. Instructors should understand and be knowledgeable in current developments in their field. Where appropriate, this should be demonstrated in their approach to teaching. It is in fields of rapidly changing technology where renewal time is not adequate, an instructor may not be able to achieve mastery of current developments...
Sample 1

Related to Informing Candidates of the Decision

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Submitting Investigator An investigator who submitted a genomic dataset to an NIH designated data repository (e.g., dbGaP).

  • Alternative to Litigation 13.2.1 The Parties desire to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement without litigation. Accordingly, the Parties agree to use the following Dispute Resolution procedures with respect to any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its breach.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. 5 5 Payment Terms and Funding Out Clause This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. 6

  • Selection and Payment of Appeal Panel In the event an Appellant delivers an Appeal Notice to the Appellee (together with proof of payment of the applicable bond) in compliance with the provisions of Paragraph 5.1 above, the Appeal will be heard by a three (3) person arbitration panel (the “Appeal Panel”). (a) Within ten (10) calendar days after the Appeal Date, the Appellee shall select and submit to the Appellant the names of five (5) arbitrators that are designated as “neutrals” or qualified arbitrators by Utah ADR Services (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) (such five (5) designated persons hereunder are referred to herein as the “Proposed Appeal Arbitrators”). For the avoidance of doubt, each Proposed Appeal Arbitrator must be qualified as a “neutral” with Utah ADR Services, and shall not be the arbitrator who rendered the Arbitration Award being appealed (the “Original Arbitrator”). Within five (5) calendar days after the Appellee has submitted to the Appellant the names of the Proposed Appeal Arbitrators, the Appellant must select, by written notice to the Appellee, three (3) of the Proposed Appeal Arbitrators to act as the members of the Appeal Panel. If the Appellant fails to select three (3) of the Proposed Appeal Arbitrators in writing within such 5-day period, then the Appellee may select such three (3) arbitrators from the Proposed Appeal Arbitrators by providing written notice of such selection to the Appellant. (b) If the Appellee fails to submit to the Appellant the names of the Proposed Appeal Arbitrators within ten (10) calendar days after the Appeal Date pursuant to subparagraph (a) above, then the Appellant may at any time prior to the Appellee so designating the Proposed Appeal Arbitrators, identify the names of five (5) arbitrators that are designated as “neutrals” or qualified arbitrators by Utah ADR Service (none of whom may be the Original Arbitrator) by written notice to the Appellee. The Appellee may then, within five (5) calendar days after the Appellant has submitted notice of its selected arbitrators to the Appellee, select, by written notice to the Appellant, three (3) of such selected arbitrators to serve on the Appeal Panel. If the Appellee fails to select in writing within such 5-day period three (3) of the arbitrators selected by the Appellant to serve as the members of the Appeal Panel, then the Appellant may select the three (3) members of the Appeal Panel from the Appellant’s list of five (5) arbitrators by providing written notice of such selection to the Appellee. (c) If a selected Proposed Appeal Arbitrator declines or is otherwise unable to serve, then the party that selected such Proposed Appeal Arbitrator may select one (1) of the other five (5) designated Proposed Appeal Arbitrators within three (3) calendar days of the date a chosen Proposed Appeal Arbitrator declines or notifies the parties he or she is unable to serve as an arbitrator. If at least three (3) of the five (5) designated Proposed Appeal Arbitrators decline or are otherwise unable to serve, then the Proposed Appeal Arbitrator selection process shall begin again in accordance with this Paragraph 5.2; provided, however, that any Proposed Appeal Arbitrators who have already agreed to serve shall remain on the Appeal Panel. (d) The date that all three (3) Proposed Appeal Arbitrators selected pursuant to this Paragraph 5.2 agree in writing (including via email) delivered to both the Appellant and the Appellee to serve as members of the Appeal Panel hereunder is referred to herein as the “Appeal Commencement Date”. No later than five (5) calendar days after the Appeal Commencement Date, the Appellee shall designate in writing (including via email) to the Appellant and the Appeal Panel the name of one (1) of the three (3) members of the Appeal Panel to serve as the lead arbitrator in the Appeal proceedings. Each member of the Appeal Panel shall be deemed an arbitrator for purposes of these Arbitration Provisions and the Arbitration Act, provided that, in conducting the Appeal, the Appeal Panel may only act or make determinations upon the approval or vote of no less than the majority vote of its members, as announced or communicated by the lead arbitrator on the Appeal Panel. If an arbitrator on the Appeal Panel ceases or is unable to act during the Appeal proceedings, a replacement arbitrator shall be chosen in accordance with Paragraph 5.2 above to continue the Appeal as a member of the Appeal Panel. If Utah ADR Services ceases to exist or to provide a list of neutrals, then the arbitrators for the Appeal Panel shall be selected under the then prevailing rules of the American Arbitration Association.

  • Candidates The Superintendent or designee shall invite all current candidates for the office of Board member to attend:

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • INVESTIGATIONS OF MISHAPS AND CLOSE CALLS In the case of a close call, mishap or mission failure, the Parties agree to provide assistance to each other in the conduct of any investigation. For all NASA mishaps or close calls, Partner agrees to comply with XXX 0000.0, "NASA Procedural Requirements for Mishap and Close Call Reporting, Investigating, and Recordkeeping".

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.

  • FLORIDA CONVICTED/SUSPENDED/DISCRIMINATORY COMPLAINTS By submission of an offer, the respondent affirms that it is not currently listed in the Florida Department of Management Services Convicted/Suspended/Discriminatory Complaint Vendor List.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!