Institutional Framework. 1. The Parties agree to retain the Joint Committee, established pursuant to the 1983 Andean Community Co-operation Agreement and retained by the 1993 Framework Co-operation Agreement. This Committee shall meet alternatively in the European Union and the Andean Community at senior official level. The agenda for the Joint Committee meetings shall be set by mutual agreement. The Committee shall itself establish provisions concerning the frequency of its meetings, chairmanship and other issues that may Arise, including, as appropriate, the creation of subcommittees.
2. The Joint Committee shall be responsible for the general implementation of the agreement. It shall also discuss any question affecting economic relations between the Parties, including sanitary and phytosanitary issues, including with individual Member Countries of the Andean Community.
3. A Joint Consultative Committee to assist the Joint Committee to promote dialogue with economic and social organisations of organised civil society shall be established.
4. The Parties encourage the European Parliament and Parlandino to establish an Inter-parliamentarian Committee, in the framework of this Agreement, in accordance with past practice.
Institutional Framework. 1. The Parties shall utilize the existing Melanesian Spearhead Group Institutional framework for the purposes of overseeing the implementation of this Agreement.
2. In accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article the Annual Summit of Heads of Governments of the Melanesian Spearhead Group shall provide policy directions with respect to the implementation of this Agreement.
3. Trade officials of the Parties shall meet annually prior to the Annual Summit of Heads of Governments to jointly review trade among parties including goods not listed in Schedule 1 to this Agreement with the review to inclusion of additional items in that Schedule.
4. The Annual Summit of the Heads of Governments may decide from time to time to establish technical committees to oversee the implementation of specific fields of activity of this Agreement such as quarantine customs and trade.
Institutional Framework. 1. The Parties agree to retain the Joint Committee, established pursuant to the 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx-XX Cooperation Agreement and retained by the 1993 Framework Cooperation Agreement.
2. The Joint Committee shall be responsible for the general implementation of the Agreement. It shall also discuss any question affecting economic relations between the Parties, including with individual Member Countries of Central America.
3. The agendas for Joint Committee meetings shall be set by mutual agreement. The Committee shall itself establish provisions concerning the frequency and location of its meetings, chairmanship, and other issues that may arise, and shall, where necessary, set up sub-committees.
4. A Joint Consultative Committee, consisting of representatives of the Consultative Committee of the Central American Integration System (CC-XXXX) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), shall be established in order to assist the Joint Committee to promote dialogue with economic and social organizations of civil society.
5. The Parties encourage the European Parliament and the Central American Parliament (Parlacen) to establish an Inter-parliamentarian Committee, in the framework of this Agreement, in accordance with their constitutional laws.
Institutional Framework. 1. The Parties agree to retain the Joint Committee, established pursuant to the 1985 Central America-EC Cooperation Agreement and retained by the 1993 Framework Cooperation Agreement.
2. The Joint Committee shall be responsible for the general implementation of the Agreement. It shall also discuss any question affecting economic relations between the Parties, including with individual Member Countries of Central America.
3. The agendas for Joint Committee meetings shall be set by mutual agreement. The Committee shall itself establish provisions concerning the frequency and location of its meetings, chairmanship, and other issues that may arise, and shall, where necessary, set up sub-committees.
4. A Joint Consultative Committee, consisting of representatives of the Consultative Committee of the Central American Integration System (CC-XXXX) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), shall be established in order to assist the Joint Committee to promote dialogue with economic and social organizations of civil society.
5. The Parties encourage the European Parliament and the Central American Parliament (Parlacen) to establish an Inter-parliamentarian Committee, in the framework of this Agreement, in accordance with their constitutional laws.
Institutional Framework. After the signature of this MOU, each Party will appoint a staff member who will act as focal point for the implementation of the MOU. The focal point will ensure the implementation of the cooperation programme and facilitate the exchange of information between the Parties on matters of common interest.
Institutional Framework. Article 3.
Institutional Framework. The University's arrangements for monitoring and evaluation of fair access and widening participation mirror its inclusive approach to the organisation and delivery of services that support under-represented groups (see section 1.1), in that our approach is integrated and embedded within a wider institutional framework. This institutional framework for monitoring and evaluation comprises three levels of scrutiny - corporate, operational and activity. At a corporate level, this Access Agreement is the responsibility of the Deputy Vice- Chancellor, working closely with the Director of Student and Learning Services and other senior management in directorates and in faculties. Performance outcomes are reported through operational review to the University Executive, the Academic Board and Board of Governors. Both the Board of Governors and Academic Board include student representation. In respect of raising aspirations and outreach work, the University-wide Recruitment Tutor Team (RTT) will receive reports on work with schools, colleges and other partners. Retention and student success measures will be monitored by new forums at both University and faculty level established under the University's Student Success and Retention Framework. These operational arrangements are complemented by the University's over- arching planning, monitoring and review cycle, comprising the annual business planning and annual quality review processes, both of which are carried out at departmental and faculty level. At the individual activity level, staff and teams responsible for delivery will routinely evaluate their achievement and progress against operating plans and agreed measures. The aggregation of activity monitoring will provide an evaluation of performance against institutional targets and milestones contained in the Access Agreement under Section 5. Data capture and reporting against a number of institutional PIs enable the monitoring of a wide range of course level indicators relevant to access and participation, and to the targets set in the Access Agreement. Evaluation of the impact and outcome of activities is further enhanced by the University's capacity to undertake investigative research into particular themes or topics through its Institutional Research Team.
Institutional Framework. The following bodies shall be responsible for managing the Transfrontier Park:
(a) The Ministerial Committee;
(b) the Joint Management Board;
(c) the Co-ordinating Party
(d) other bodies may be established if required
Institutional Framework. Three institutions will be involved in the project: the Ministry for Infrastructure of Ukraine, the beneficiary, in partnership with the State Service of Ukraine on Transport Safety and Security (UkrTransBezpeka) and JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”. The Ministry for Infrastructure of Ukraine (a legal successor of the former Ministry for Transport and Communication), which incorporates the Department of State Policy in Railway Transport Sector and the Department of Safety and Security on Transport involved in the twinning project in question, is responsible for the development and implementation of the state transport sector policy, transport safety and security, acts within the structure approved for 2015 (Annex 2). In February 2015 the Government8 established the State Service of Ukraine on Transport Safety and Security (UkrTransBezpeka). This was done through consolidation of State Inspectorate of Ukraine for Land Transport Safety and Security (UkrTransInspektsia) and State Inspectorate of Ukraine for Sea and 8 CMU Resolution no 103 of 11 February 2015 ‘On approving the Regulation on State Service for Transport Safety and Security’. River Transport Safety and Security (UkrMorRichInspektsia). UkrTransBezpeka implements the state policy of safety and security in the areas of public road, urban electrical, rail, maritime and river transport (except the sea shipping safety and security of the fishing fleet ships). Public joint stock company “Ukrainian railway” (JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”) (former State Administration for Railway Transport of Ukraine) is a legal entity formed under the Law of Ukraine "On Peculiarities of the Creation of a Public Railway company" and Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on June 25, 2014 № 200 "On Establishment of Joint Stock Company" Ukrainian Railway". JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia” with 100 percent of the shares fixed in state ownership was created on the basis of State Administration for Railway Transport of Ukraine and enterprises, institutions and organizations of railway public transport officially starts its activity on the 1st of December 2015.
Institutional Framework. 1. The Parties agree to retain the Joint Committee established pursuant to the 1983 Andean Community Cooperation Agreement and retained by the 1993 Framework Cooperation Agreement. This Committee shall meet alternatively in the European Union and the Andean Community at senior official level. The agenda for the Joint Committee meetings shall be set by mutual agreement. The Committee shall itself establish provisions concerning the frequency of its meetings, chairmanship and other issues that may arise, including, as appropriate, the creation of subcommittees.
2. The Joint Committee shall be responsible for the general implementation of the agreement. It shall also discuss any question affecting economic relations between the Parties, including sanitary and phytosanitary issues, including with individual Member Countries of the Andean Community.
3. A Joint Consultative Committee to assist the Joint Committee to promote dialogue with economic and social organisations of organised civil society shall be established.
4. The Parties encourage the European Parliament and Parlandino to establish an Inter-parliamentarian Committee, within the framework of this Agreement, in accordance with past practice.
