INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL EVALUATION Sample Clauses

INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL EVALUATION. A. 1. Evaluation of instructional personnel performance and professional competency is the responsibility of the Board and SchoolAdministration.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL EVALUATION. 13.1 The parties recognize that the evaluation of the performance of all employees is the responsibility of the administration, and that the evaluation process is designed to improve the quality of service performed by the employees.
INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL EVALUATION. Summary: 15.10 language wasn’t in line with ratified language changes from 2020-2021 PREAMBLE The parties acknowledge that the evaluation procedures for Instructional Personnel covered by this agreement that follow have been agreed upon by the parties hereto with reluctance, and that such agreement is made because of the requirements and mandates of applicable Florida law. Florida law requires the Instructional Personnel evaluation system be used as a requisite component to determine the wages, hours, and working conditions for Instructional Personnel and is therefore a mandatory subject of bargaining. Further, the parties agree that should at any time the Florida law applicable to such evaluation procedures be changed by the Florida Legislature or overturned by a court decision to which the Polk County School Board is subject, then in that event the parties agree to promptly renew collective bargaining negotiations for the purpose of modifying the procedures set forth herein and no human capital decisions will be made using this system until a new agreement is ratified through collective bargaining.
INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL EVALUATION. Executive SummaryThe principal or their designee must not electronically finalize another observation until 5 working days have passed since the last finalized observation.

Related to INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL EVALUATION

  • Access to Personnel File Each employee shall have reasonable access to his/her personnel file for the purpose of reviewing any evaluations or formal disciplinary notations contained therein, in the presence of the Director of Personnel or designate. An employee has the right to request copies of any evaluations in this file.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.