Interrogation Sample Clauses

Interrogation. An employee who is being interrogated concerning an incident or action which may subject him/her to disciplinary action shall be notified of his/her right to have a Union xxxxxxx or other representative present, upon request, provided, however, this provision shall not unreasonably delay completion of the interrogation. This provision shall be applicable to interrogation before, during or after the filing of a charge against an employee or notification to the employee of disciplinary action.

Interrogation. (a) An employee who is being interrogated concerning an incident or action which may subject him/her to disciplinary action shall be notified of his/her right to have a Union Xxxxxxx or other representative present upon request, provided however, this provision shall not unreasonably delay completion of the interrogation. The interrogation shall not in any case be delayed beyond twelve (12) working hours irrespective of the ability of the Union to provide the required representation. However, no employee will be forced to appear on the day/shift of such notice. This provision shall be applicable to interrogation before, during or after the filing of a charge against an employee or notification to the employee of disciplinary action. (b) No employee shall be compelled to offer oral or written evidence against himself/herself in any investigation or (pre)

Interrogation. The Outstation may be interrogated, or data automatically received from the Outstation may be reviewed, to check: (A) that the Outstation ID is the same as expected; (B) that the Outstation Number of Channels is the same as expected;

Interrogation. (a) An employee who is being interrogated concerning an incident or action which may subject him/her to disciplinary action shall be notified of his/her right to have a Union Xxxxxxx or other representative present upon request, provided however, this provision shall not unreasonably delay completion of the interrogation. The interrogation shall not in any case be delayed beyond twelve (12) working hours irrespective of the ability of the Union to provide the required representation. However, no employee will be forced to appear on the day/shift of such notice. This provision shall be applicable to interrogation before, during or after the filing of a charge against an employee or notification to the employee of disciplinary action. (b) No employee shall be compelled to offer oral or written evidence against himself/herself in any investigation or (pre) (c) An employee who is not the subject of the disciplinary investigation may be questioned by management regarding their knowledge or understanding of the matter under investigation. Said employee may request to be accompanied by a Union Xxxxxxx or other representative at any meeting with management for the purpose of this questioning. Said request shall not be unreasonably denied.

Interrogation. An employee who is being interrogated concerning an incident or action which may subject him/her to disciplinary action shall be notified of his/her right to have a Union Xxxxxxx or other representative, upon request, provided, however, this provision shall not unreasonably delay completion of the interrogation or notification of disciplinary action. The provision shall be applicable to interrogation before, during or after filing of a charge against an employee or notification to the employee of disciplinary action. Prior to the interrogation, the employee shall be notified of the subject of the investigation. The employee shall also be notified at that time if the subject may be considered to be a criminal matter. In cases in which the facts, in a claim against an employee, if proven would constitute criminal behavior, the employee may refuse to answer questions on the grounds that the answer would tend to incriminate him/her. If the facts alleged would not constitute a crime, if the employee at first refuses to answer questions on the grounds of self-incrimination, the employer may specifically order him/her to do so, in which case the employee shall be required to answer, but the answer will be treated as involuntary and may not be used in any way in a criminal proceeding against him/her. The provisions of this Section shall not be interpreted to prevent a supervisor from questioning an employee at the workplace.

Interrogation. When an Officer is under investigation by the Tulsa Police Department for a complaint received, and is to be interrogated in respect to such complaint by other members of the department when there is a logical possibility that suspension, demotion, or dismissal may result, such interrogation shall be conducted as follows: a) The Officer may be informed of the name of all complainants, if known if it is determined by the Chief that so informing the officer will not compromise the investigation in any way. b) Preliminary discussions with supervisory personnel within the Police Department, in relation to a complaint received, shall not be considered as interrogation as used herein. c) The Officer under investigation shall be informed of the rank, name, and command of the Officer in charge of the investigation, the interrogating Officer, and all persons present during the interrogation. All questions directed to the Officer under interrogation shall be asked by and through one interrogator at any one time. d) The Officer under investigation shall be informed of the nature of the investigation prior to any interrogation. e) Interrogating sessions shall be for reasonable periods and shall be timed to allow for such personal necessities and rest periods as are reasonably necessary. f) The Officer under interrogation shall not be subjected to offensive language or threatened with transfer, dismissal, or disciplinary action. No promise or reward shall be made as an inducement to obtain testimony or evidence. g) The Officer under interrogation shall be completely informed of all his rights pursuant to this procedure prior to the commencement of the interrogation and of his responsibility to answer all questions, and this notification shall be included on the tape recording or written record of the session. h) At the request of any Officer under investigation, he shall have the right to be represented by counsel or any other representative of his choice who may be present at all times during such interrogation. i) Interrogation of Officers under investigation may be taped or recorded in written form at the discretion of the investigating Officer. Officers under investigation may record the proceedings with his own equipment or record at his own expense. Records and tapes compiled by the department shall be exclusively retained by the department as confidential information, but may be used at the discretion of the City in administrative hearings or for other administr...

Interrogation. An employee who is being interrogated concerning an incident or action which may subject him/her to disciplinary action shall be notified of his/her right to have a Union designee upon request, provided, however, this provision shall not delay completion of the interrogation in excess of forty-eight (48) hours, This provision shall be applicable to interrogation before, during, or after the filing of a charge against an employee or notification to the employee of disciplinary action. No employee shall be subject to discipline as a result of refusal to be a witness against himself/herself at any step of the grievance procedure. The provisions of this Section shall not be interpreted to prevent a supervisor from questioning an employee at the workplace.

Interrogation. The Outstation may be interrogated, or data automatically received from the Outstation may be reviewed, to check: (A) that the Outstation ID is the same as expected; (B) that the Outstation Number of Channels is the same as expected; (C) that the time of the Outstation does not differ by more than fifteen (15) minutes from UTC; or (D) that the individual alarms described in the TSRs are not flagged.

Interrogation. An AAG who is being interrogated concerning an incident or action which may subject him/her to disciplinary action shall be notified of his/her right to have a Union Xxxxxxx or other representative present upon request, provided however, this provision shall not unreasonably delay completion of the interrogation. The interrogation shall not in any case be delayed beyond twenty-four (24) working hours irrespective of the ability of the Union to provide the required representation. However, no AAG will be forced to appear on the day/shift of such notice. This provision shall be applicable to interrogation before, during or after the filing of a charge against an AAG or notification to the AAG of disciplinary action.

Interrogation. When a Police Officer is under investigation by the Sand Springs Police Department for a complaint received, and is to be interrogated, such interrogating will be conducted as follows: 1. Preliminary discussions with supervisory personnel within the Police Department, in relation to a complaint received, will not be considered as interrogation as used herein. 2. The officer being interrogated will be presented with a notice of investigation prior to questioning. This may have been previously provided as listed above in Section 2a. All questions directed to the Employee under interrogation will be asked by and through one interrogator at any one time, and all interviewing shall be limited in scope to activities, circumstances or events which pertain to the Officer's conduct or act(s) which form the basis for the investigation. 3. The Officer shall be allowed the right to consult a Lodge representative or any attorney prior to the interview and shall have the right to a representative or attorney of the Officer’s choice who may be present at all times during such interview or interrogation. a) Interviewing sessions shall be for reasonable periods of time and will be timed to allow for such personal necessities and rest periods as are reasonably necessary. b) In accordance with the "Xxxxxxx Rule", if the activities, circumstances or events which pertain to the Officer's conduct or act(s) which form the basis for the investigation could possibly result in criminal charges, the Officer may refuse to answer questions or cooperate with the criminal investigation. Such refusal shall not be subject to disciplinary action.