No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals Sample Clauses

No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals. Section 4.1 The Securityholder (in such Securityholder’s capacity as such) shall, and shall cause its Affiliates, and its and their respective officers, directors, managers or employees, and shall instruct its and their respective accountants, consultants, legal counsel, financial advisors, agents and other representatives to: (a) immediately cease any existing solicitations, discussions or negotiations with any Persons that may be ongoing with respect to any Inquiry and (b) not, and not publicly announce any intention to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage or facilitate any Inquiry (it being understood and agreed that answering unsolicited phone calls shall not be deemed to “facilitate” for purposes of, or otherwise constitute a violation of, this Section 4.1), (ii) furnish non-public information to any Person in connection with an Inquiry or an Alternative Proposal or (iii) enter into, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to an Inquiry or an Alternative Proposal. Section 4.2 The Securityholder shall (a) notify Parent reasonably promptly (but in no event more than twenty-four (24) hours) following such Securityholder’s receipt of any Alternative Proposal or any Inquiry or request for non-public information relating to the Company or any Company Subsidiary by any Person who has made or could reasonably be expected to make any Alternative Proposal, (b) advise Parent in writing of (i) the receipt of such Alternative Proposal, Inquiry or request, (ii) the identity of the Person making any such Alternative Proposal, Inquiry or request, and (iii) the terms and conditions of such Alternative Proposal or potential Alternative Proposal or the nature of the information requested, (iv) as reasonably promptly as practicable provide to Parent: (1) a copy of such Alternative Proposal or potential Alternative Proposal, if in writing, or a written summary of the material terms of such Alternative Proposal, if oral, and (2) copies of all written requests, proposals, correspondence or offer, including proposed agreements received by such Securityholder or any of its Representatives; and (c) keep Parent reasonably informed on a reasonably current basis, or upon Parent’s reasonable request, (i) of the status and material terms of (including amendments or revisions or proposed amendments or revisions to) each such Alternative Proposal or potential Alternative Proposal, and (ii) as to ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals. (a) Commencing on the date hereof, the Company shall (and shall cause its subsidiaries, Affiliates, Representatives, and subsidiaries’ and Affiliates’ Representatives to) (i) immediately cease and terminate all existing discussions or negotiations, if any, with any Persons conducted prior to the date of this Agreement with respect to or that could reasonably be expected to lead to an Alternative Transaction (as hereinafter defined), (ii) use its commercially reasonable to obtain the destruction of, in accordance with the terms of any applicable confidentiality agreement, any nonpublic information previously furnished by the Company, its subsidiaries or Affiliates, or any of their respective Representatives to any third-party (other than the Excluded Parties) in connection with any Alternative Proposal or any discussions, correspondence or negotiations relating to a potential Alternative Transaction, and prevent any such third-party (other than the Excluded Parties) from accessing any online data rooms containing nonpublic information regarding the Company, and (iii) comply with this Section 6.2. (b) During the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and continuing until the earlier of (x) the Closing Date and (y) the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section 8.1 (the “No-Shop Period”), the Company shall not (and shall cause its subsidiaries, Affiliates, Representatives, and subsidiaries’ and Affiliates’ Representatives not to) directly or indirectly (i) solicit, initiate, encourage or take any other action designed to solicit an Alternative Transaction, (ii) participate in any written correspondence, discussions or negotiations regarding any Alternative Transaction, (iii) enter into any letter of intent, agreement in principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement related to any Alternative Transaction or (iv) furnish any nonpublic information to any third parties (other than the Excluded Parties). (c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be set forth in Section 6.2(b), if, during the No-Shop Period, the Board of Directors determines in good faith that it is required to authorize such actions to comply with its fiduciary duties under any applicable Law, including the Bankruptcy Code, the Company or any of its Representatives may take any of the actions referred to in clauses (ii) and (iv) of Section 6.2(b) with respect to any Person that during the No-Shop Period delivered a written, unsolicited bona fide Alt...
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals subsection of ‘‘The Merger Agreement’’ section in this joint proxy and consent solicitation statement/prospectus for more details on circumstances that may constitute an Alternative Proposal, and the associated actions and potential consequences of such circumstances. Solus Alternative Asset Management LP (‘‘Solus’’) and South Dakota Investment Council (‘‘SDIC’’), which are currently significant stockholders of Xxxxxxx, collectively holding a majority in voting power of Xxxxxxx’x equity securities, have each entered into separate Voting Agreements with Xxxxxxx and Era, pursuant to which each stockholder has agreed to deliver and duly execute a written consent in favor of the Merger. Such consents are to be executed and delivered within two Business Days following the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this proxy and consent solicitation statement/prospectus forms a part. As of January 23, 2020, the date on which the Voting Agreements were signed, Solus held 3,220,501 shares of Xxxxxxx Common Stock and 1,720,297 shares of Xxxxxxx Preferred Stock and SDIC held 2,783,012 shares of Xxxxxxx Common Stock and 2,018,384 shares of Xxxxxxx Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the Certificate of Designations for the Xxxxxxx Preferred Stock (the ‘‘Xxxxxxx Certificate of Designations’’), with respect to matters submitted to a vote of the holders of Xxxxxxx Common Stock, holders of each share of Xxxxxxx Preferred Stock will be entitled to vote on an ‘‘as-converted’’ basis, which deems each share of Xxxxxxx Preferred Stock to have been converted to 1.33 shares of Xxxxxxx Common Stock. Therefore, for the purpose of approving the Merger, on an as-converted basis, Solus is deemed to hold 5,515,019 shares of Xxxxxxx Common Stock and SDIC is deemed to hold 5,475,116, shares of Xxxxxxx Common Stock, and together they are deemed to hold an aggregate amount of 10,990,135 shares, or 51.2%, of Xxxxxxx Common Stock (the ‘‘Subject Shares’’). The deemed conversion of the Xxxxxxx Preferred Stock for the purpose of voting is distinct from the Preferred Stock Conversion. Pursuant to the Voting Agreements, both Solus and SDIC have agreed not to Transfer (as defined in the Voting Agreements) the Subject Shares without the prior written consent of Xxxxxxx and Era until the earliest of (i) the Effective Time of the Merger, (ii) the date and time of a valid termination of the Merger Agreement and (iii) any amendment, modification, change or waiver of any provisions of the Merger Ag...
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals beginning on page 107); ○ the provision of the merger agreement allowing the Bristow Board, prior to obtaining Bristow stockholder approval, to change its recommendation to Bristow stockholders with respect to the adoption of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, if it determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that either an acquisition proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or that failure to make such change in recommendation following an intervening event would be inconsistent with the Bristow directors’ duties under applicable law, subject, in each case, to the obligation to pay Era a termination fee of $9 million, as further described in ‘‘The Merger Agreement—Termination Fee; Expense Fee’’ beginning on page 116;
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals. The merger agreement precludes Starwood and Marriott from soliciting or engaging in discussions or negotiations with a third party with respect to any proposal for a competing transaction, including the acquisition of a significant interest in Starwood’s or Marriott’s capital stock or assets. However, if Starwood or Marriott receives an unsolicited proposal from a third party for a competing transaction that Starwood’s Board or Marriott’s Board, as applicable, among other things, determines in good faith (after consultation with its legal and financial advisors) (i) is reasonably likely to lead to a proposal that is superior to the Combination Transactions and (ii) did not result from a breach of the non-solicitation obligations set forth in the merger agreement, then Starwood or Marriott, as applicable, may furnish non-public information to and enter into discussions with, and only with, that third party and its representatives and financing sources about such competing transaction. For more information on the limitations on Starwood and Marriott and their boards to consider other proposals, see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals” beginning on page 130. Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx may mutually agree to terminate the merger agreement before completing the Combination Transactions, even after obtaining stockholder approval. In addition, either Starwood or Marriott may terminate the merger agreement, even after obtaining stockholder approval: • if the Initial Holdco Merger is not consummated by December 31, 2016; • if the approval of the Starwood combination transactions proposal will not have been obtained by reason of the failure to obtain the required vote at a duly convened Starwood stockholders meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof; • if the approval of the Marriott stock issuance proposal will not have been obtained by reason of the failure to obtain the required vote at a duly convened Marriott stockholders meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof; • if any legal restraint is in effect preventing the consummation of the Combination Transactions, and such restraint has become final and nonappealable, or if any governmental entity that must grant regulatory approval of the Combination Transactions under the terms of the merger agreement has denied such approval and such denial has become final and nonappealable; or • if the other party has breached or failed to perform in any material res...
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals. The merger agreement precludes Starwood and Marriott from soliciting or engaging in discussions or negotiations with a third party with respect to any proposal for a competing transaction, including the acquisition of a significant interest in Starwood’s or Marriott’s capital stock or assets. However, if Starwood or Marriott receives an unsolicited proposal from a third party for a competing transaction that Starwood’s Board or Marriott’s Board, as applicable, among other things, determines in good faith (after consultation with its legal and financial advisors) (i) is reasonably likely to lead to a proposal that is superior to the Combination Transactions and (ii) did not result from a breach of the non-solicitation obligations set forth in the merger agreement, then Starwood or Marriott, as applicable, may furnish non-public information to and enter into discussions with, and only with, that third party and its representatives and financing sources about such competing transaction. For more information on the limitations on Starwood and Marriott and their boards to consider other proposals, see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals” beginning on page 130.
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals. (See page 160)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals

  • No Solicitation of Other Offers (a) The Stockholder shall, and shall cause its Affiliates, officers, directors, employees, representatives, consultants, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other agents to, immediately cease any discussions or negotiations with any other parties that may be ongoing with respect to any Acquisition Proposal in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The Stockholder agrees that it shall not, directly or indirectly, take (and shall not permit its Affiliates, officers, directors, employees, representatives, consultants, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants or other agents, to so take) any action to (i) solicit, initiate or encourage the making of any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) participate in any way in discussions or negotiations with, or furnish or disclose any information to, any Person (other than Orix or the agents or representatives of Orix) in connection with, or take any other action to encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal that is reasonably expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal, (iii) enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, (iv) withdraw or modify, or propose to withdraw or modify, in a manner adverse to Orix, the approval of the Merger Agreement, the Merger or the purchase of any Stock under the Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 21, 1999 or (v) approve or propose to approve, any Acquisition Proposal. (b) In addition to the obligations of the Stockholder set forth in Section 4(a) hereof, promptly after receipt thereof, the Stockholder agrees that it shall advise Orix of any request for information or of any Acquisition Proposal, or any inquiry, proposal, discussions or negotiation with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, the terms and conditions of such request, Acquisition Proposal, inquiry, proposal, discussion or negotiation and the Stockholder shall promptly provide to Orix copies of any written materials received by the Stockholder in connection with any of the foregoing, and the identity of the Person making any such Acquisition Proposal or such request, inquiry or proposal or with whom any discussion or negotiation are taking place.

  • No Solicitation; Other Offers (a) Neither Siebel nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, nor shall Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries authorize or permit any of its or their officers, directors, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants or other agents, representatives or advisors (the “Siebel Representatives”) to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate, knowingly facilitate or knowingly encourage the submission of any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, furnish any non-public information relating to Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries to or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries to any Third Party that has made, or has informed Siebel that it is seeking to make, an Acquisition Proposal, (iii) grant any Third Party waiver or release under any standstill or similar agreement with respect to any class of equity securities of Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries or amend or terminate the Siebel Rights Plan or redeem the Siebel Rights or (iv) enter into any agreement (except for confidentiality agreements, referred to in Section 6.04(b)) with any Third Party with respect to an Acquisition Proposal made by such Third Party, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding requiring it to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the Mergers or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Siebel (through one or more of the Siebel Representatives) or its Board of Directors may, prior to the Siebel Stockholder Approval, (i) engage in negotiations or discussions with any Third Party (or with the representatives of any Third Party) that has made an Acquisition Proposal not solicited in violation of Section 6.03(a) if such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (such Third Party, a “Qualified Third Party”), (ii) furnish to such Qualified Third Party or its representatives non-public information relating to Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to an executed confidentiality agreement containing customary nondisclosure provisions (which need not include “standstill ” or similar provisions) (and a copy of which shall be promptly (in all events within 24 hours) provided for informational purposes only to Oracle), (iii) grant a waiver or release under any standstill or similar agreement with respect to any class of equity securities of Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries, (iv) amend or terminate the Siebel Rights Plan or redeem the Siebel Rights, (v) withdraw the Siebel Board Recommendation or modify the Siebel Board Recommendation in a manner adverse to Oracle (any such action, a “Change in Recommendation”), (vi) terminate this Agreement pursuant to and subject to the terms of Section 9.01(d) and/or (vii) take any action that any court of competent jurisdiction orders Siebel, one or more of the Siebel Representatives or the Board of Directors of Siebel to take, but in each case referred to in the foregoing clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) only if the Board of Directors of Siebel determines in good faith by a majority vote, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Board of Directors of Siebel from complying with Rule 14e-2(a), Rule 14d-9 and Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A under the 1934 Act with regard to an Acquisition Proposal; provided that the Board of Directors of Siebel shall not recommend that Siebel’s stockholders tender shares of capital stock in connection with any tender or exchange offer unless such Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith by a majority vote, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to make such recommendation would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable Law. (c) The Board of Directors of Siebel shall not take any of the actions referred to in clauses (i) through (vii) of the preceding subsection unless Siebel shall have delivered to Oracle a prior written notice advising Oracle that it intends to take such action. In addition, Siebel shall notify Oracle promptly (but in no event later than 24 hours) after an officer or director first obtains Knowledge of the receipt by Siebel (or any of the Siebel Representatives) of any Acquisition Proposal, any inquiry that would reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal, or any request for confidential information relating to Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries or for access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of Siebel or any of its Subsidiaries by any Third Party that has informed Siebel that it is considering making, or has made, an Acquisition Proposal. Siebel shall provide such notice orally and in writing and shall identify the Third Party making, and the material terms and conditions of, any such Acquisition Proposal, inquiry or request. Siebel shall promptly provide Oracle with any non-public information concerning Siebel’s business, present or future performance, financial condition or results of operations, provided to any Qualified Third Party after the date of this Agreement in connection with an Acquisition Proposal made by such Third Party that was not previously provided to Oracle. Siebel shall keep Oracle promptly and reasonably informed, on a reasonably current basis, of the status and material details of any such Acquisition Proposal, inquiry or request. Siebel shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries and the Siebel Representatives to, cease immediately and cause to be terminated any and all existing activities, discussions or negotiations, if any, with any Third Party with respect to any Acquisition Proposal and shall instruct any such Third Party (or its agents or advisors) in possession of confidential information about Siebel that was furnished by or on behalf of Siebel with respect to any Acquisition Proposal within the six months prior to the date hereof to return or destroy all such information.

  • No Change in Recommendation or Alternative Acquisition Agreement The board of directors of the Company and each committee of the board of directors shall not: (i) (A) withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify (or publicly propose or resolve to withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify), in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Recommendation (B) fail to include the Company Recommendation in the Proxy Statement, (C) approve, recommend or otherwise declare advisable or propose or resolve to approve, recommend or otherwise declare advisable (publicly or otherwise), any Acquisition Proposal, or (D) fail to publicly reaffirm the Company Recommendation within ten business days after Parent so requests in writing (provided, that Parent shall be entitled to make such a written request for reaffirmation only once for each Acquisition Proposal and once for each material amendment to such Acquisition Proposal) (any action described in clauses (A) and (D) a “Change of Recommendation”); or (ii) Except as expressly permitted by, and after compliance with this Section 6.2(d), cause or permit the Company to enter into any Alternative Acquisition Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, prior to the time, but not after, the Company Requisite Vote is obtained, the board of directors of the Company (x) may make a Change of Recommendation and in connection therewith, approve, recommend or otherwise declare advisable, and enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement in connection with a Superior Proposal made after the date of this Agreement (if such Superior Proposal did not result from a material breach of Section 6.2(a) and such Superior Proposal is not withdrawn) or (y) may make a Change of Recommendation as a result of the occurrence of an Intervening Event, if, the board of directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that failure to do so would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable Law; provided, however, that the board of directors of the Company shall not (i) in the case of clause (x) make a Change of Recommendation with respect to a Superior Proposal and authorize the Company to enter into any Alterative Acquisition Agreement or (ii) in the case of clause (y) make a Change of Recommendation unless: (i) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect a Change of Recommendation, describing in reasonable detail the reasons for such Change of Recommendation (a “Recommendation Change Notice”) (it being agreed that the Recommendation Change Notice and any amendment or update to such notice and the determination to so deliver such notice, or update or amend public disclosures with respect thereto shall not constitute a Change of Recommendation for purposes of this Agreement), and if such proposed Change of Recommendation relates to an Acquisition Proposal, has provided copies of the most current version of all documents relating to such Acquisition Proposal, and if such proposed Change of Recommendation relates to an Intervening Event, such Recommendation Change Notice specifies the facts and circumstances of such Intervening Event; and (ii) (x) if requested by Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith with Parent and its Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three business days following the date on which the Recommendation Change Notice is delivered to Parent and (y) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written, binding and irrevocable offer to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three business day period, the board of directors of the Company shall have determined in good faith after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, after considering the terms of such offer by Parent, that the failure to effect a Change of Recommendation would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, and that in the case of a Change of Recommendation with respect to an Acquisition Proposal, such Acquisition Proposal would continue to constitute a Superior Proposal if the changes offered by Parent were given effect, and that in the case of an Intervening Event, the board of directors of the Company still intends to effect a Change of Recommendation if the changes offered by Parent were given effect; provided that in the event the Acquisition Proposal is thereafter modified by the party making such Acquisition Proposal, the Company shall notify Parent in writing of such modified Acquisition Proposal and shall again comply with the requirements of this clause (ii).

  • Non-Solicitation of Clients During the Restricted Period, the Executive agrees not to solicit, directly or indirectly, on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person(s), any client of the Company to whom the Company had provided services at any time during the Executive’s employment with the Company in any line of business that the Company conducts as of the date of the Executive’s termination of employment or that the Company is actively soliciting, for the purpose of marketing or providing any service competitive with any service then offered by the Company.

  • Incorporation of Solicitation The TIPS Solicitation, whether a Request for Proposals, the Request for Competitive Sealed Proposals or Request for Qualifications solicitation, the Vendor’s response to same and all associated documents and forms made part of the solicitation process, including any addenda, that resulted in the execution of this agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this agreement as if copied verbatim. THE SECTON HEADERS OR TITLES WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT ARE MERELY GUIDES FOR CONVENIENCE AND ARE NOT FOR CLASSIFICATION OR LIMITING OF THE RESPONSIBILITES OF THE PARTIES TO THIS DOCUMENT. You certify that your company (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the Agreement. Texas governmental entities are prohibited from doing business with companies that fail to certify to this condition as required by Texas Government Code Sec. 2270. You certify that your company is not listed on and we do not do business with companies that are on the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts list of Designated Foreign Terrorists Organizations per Texas Gov't Code 2270.0153 found at xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/purchasing/docs/foreign-terrorist.pdf You certify that pursuant to Texas Business and Commerce Code Chapter 272, as revised September 1, 2017, any construction contract or agreement as defined in the Statute with a TIPS, Education Service Center Region 8 or a Texas TIPS Member subject to the Statute shall include a Choice of Law provision providing that this agreement shall be subject to and interpreted by the Laws of the State of Texas without regard to any conflict of laws principles for any action shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in Texas and any arbitration shall be in the State of Texas. Pursuant to the Texas Business and Commerce Code, as amended by the 85th Texas Legislature, this Construction Agreement for Job Order Contract services is, in the event of a dispute between the parties, subject to interpretation according to the Laws of the state of Texas only, without regard to any conflict of laws principles. Venue for any alternative dispute resolution procedure or process shall be in the state of Texas. If the dispute is litigated, venue and jurisdiction shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in the state of Texas. Pursuant to 85th Texas Legislative H.B. 3270, as it applies to Texas Education Code § 22.0834 et seq, the Vendor shall comply with all relevant sections related to student contact, background checks, fingerprinting and other related requirements. It is the intent of TIPS to award to reliable, high performance vendors to supply products and services to government and educational agencies. It is the experience of TIPS that the following procedures provide TIPS, the Vendor, and the participating agency the necessary support to facilitate a mutually beneficial relationship. The specific procedures will be negotiated with the successful vendor.

  • No Solicitation The Stockholder shall, and shall cause its affiliates that it controls and its and its controlled affiliates’ respective directors, officers, employees, investment bankers, attorneys, financial and other advisors or other representatives not to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate, encourage, or induce the making, submission or announcement of, an Acquisition Proposal, (ii) furnish to any Person (other than Customers or any designees of Customers) any non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any Person (other than Customers), or take any other action intended to assist or facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal, (iii) participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to an Acquisition Proposal (other than to notify such Person as to the existence of this provision), (iv) approve, endorse or recommend an Acquisition Proposal, (v) enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding or other agreement, contract or arrangement contemplating or otherwise relating to an acquisition transaction, otherwise than pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, or (vi) terminate, amend or waive any rights under any “standstill” or other similar agreement between the Stockholder and any Person (other than Customers). The Stockholder shall immediately cease any and all existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any persons (other than Customers and its affiliates and representatives) conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Stockholder acknowledges and hereby agrees that any violation of the restrictions set forth in this Section 6 by the Stockholder or any representatives of the Stockholder shall be deemed to be a breach of this Section 6 by the Stockholder. The Stockholder shall not enter into any letter of intent or similar document or any agreement contemplating or otherwise relating to an Acquisition Proposal unless and until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms.

  • No Solicitation of Other Bids (a) None of the Sellers during the Pre-Closing Period shall and none of them shall authorize nor permit any of its Affiliates (including the Company) or any of its or their Representatives to, directly or indirectly, (i) encourage, solicit, initiate, facilitate or continue inquiries regarding an Acquisition Proposal; (ii) enter into discussions or negotiations with, or provide any information to, any Person concerning a possible Acquisition Proposal; or (iii) enter into any agreements or other instruments (whether or not binding) regarding an Acquisition Proposal. Sellers shall immediately cease and cause to be terminated, and shall cause each of their Affiliates (including the Company) and all of their Representatives to immediately cease and cause to be terminated, all existing discussions or negotiations with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to, or that could lead to, an Acquisition Proposal. (b) In addition to the other obligations under this Section 6.03, Sellers shall promptly (and in any event within three (3) Business Days after receipt thereof by any of the Sellers or any of their Representatives) advise Buyer orally and in writing of any Acquisition Proposal, any request for information with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, the material terms and conditions of such request or Acquisition Proposal. (c) Each of the Sellers agrees that the rights and remedies for noncompliance with this Section 6.03 shall include having such provision specifically enforced by any court having equity jurisdiction, it being acknowledged and agreed that any such breach or threatened breach shall cause irreparable injury to Buyer and that monetary damages would not provide an adequate remedy to Buyer.

  • Non-Solicitation The Participant covenants and agrees that during his or her employment with the Company or its Affiliates and for a period of twelve (12) months subsequent to the Participant’s Termination of Employment for any reason, whether involuntary or voluntary, the Participant shall not directly or indirectly, as an owner, stockholder, director, employee, partner, agent, broker, or consultant recruit, hire or attempt to recruit or hire other employees of the Company or its Affiliates, nor shall the Participant contact or communicate with any other employees of the Company or its Affiliates for the purpose of inducing other employees to terminate their employment with the Company or its Affiliates. For purposes of this Section 5, “other employees” shall refer to employees who are still actively employed by or doing business with the Company or its Affiliates at the time of the attempted recruiting or hiring. In addition, Participant agrees not to hire or employ, either directly or indirectly, or aid in the hire or employ of any former employee of the Company or its Affiliates within 60 days of that former employee's separation date from the Company or its Affiliates. Participant acknowledges and agrees that the damage to Company and its Affiliates if Participant breaches this Section 5 or the non-solicitation provisions contained in any written agreement by and between the Participant and the Company will be extremely difficult to determine. Therefore, Participant agrees that if Participant violates this Section 5 or the non-solicitation provisions contained in any written agreement by and between the Participant and the Company, Participant will pay to the Company the value of the RSUs received and all costs incurred by Company, including its reasonable attorneys' fees, in any claim against Participant or to defend against any claim made by Participant related to the subject-matter herein. To the extent applicable, all Awarded Units shall immediately cease to vest as of the date of such breach, and any Vested RSUs that had not been converted into Shares prior to the date of such breach and any Unvested RSUs shall be immediately forfeited and this Agreement (other than the provisions of this Section 5) will be terminated on the date of such breach.

  • No Solicitation or Negotiation At all times during the Pre-Closing Period, the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not, and shall use their reasonable best efforts to cause their respective directors, officers or other employees, controlled affiliates, and any investment banker, attorney or other advisor or representative (collectively, "Representatives") retained by any of them not to (and in any event neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall direct, authorize or permit any of such persons to), directly or indirectly: (i) solicit or initiate, or knowingly encourage or induce, the making, submission or announcement of, an Acquisition Proposal; (ii) furnish to any Person (other than Buyer, Offering Subsidiary, or any designees of Buyer or Offering Subsidiary) any non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any Person (other than Buyer, Offering Subsidiary, or any designees of Buyer or Offering Subsidiary), or take any other action, in any such case with the intent to assist or facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes or could lead to an Acquisition Proposal; (iii) participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to an Acquisition Proposal; (iv) adopt, approve, endorse or recommend an Acquisition Proposal; (v) enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, merger, acquisition or other contract or agreement contemplating or otherwise relating to an Acquisition Proposal; or (vi) terminate, amend or waive any rights under any "standstill" or other similar agreement between the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and any Person (other than Buyer).

  • Non-Solicitation or Hire During the Term and, following the termination of the Executive's employment for any reason, for a period of twenty-four (24) months, the Executive shall not (a) directly or indirectly solicit, attempt to solicit or induce (x) any party who is a customer of the Company or its subsidiaries, who was a customer of the Company or its subsidiaries at any time during the twelve (12) month period immediately prior to the date the Executive's employment terminates or who is a prospective customer that has been identified and targeted by the Company or its subsidiaries as of the Termination Date, for the purpose of marketing, selling or providing to any such party any services or products offered by or available from the Company or its subsidiaries, or (y) any supplier to the Company or any subsidiary to terminate, reduce or alter negatively its relationship with the Company or any subsidiary or in any manner interfere with any agreement or contract between the Company or any subsidiary and such supplier or (b) hire any employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates (a "Current Employee") or any person who was an employee of or consultant to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates during the six (6) month period immediately prior to the date the Executive's employment terminates (a "Former Employee") or directly or indirectly solicit or induce a Current or Former Employee to terminate such employee's employment relationship with the Protected Parties in order, in either case, to enter into a similar relationship with the Executive, or any other person or any entity; provided, however, that nothing in Section 6.3(b) (i) shall be deemed to prohibit general solicitations for employment through advertisements or other means that may be seen by employees of the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates or (ii) preclude the Executive from employing any person whose employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates was involuntarily terminated.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!