OEM Evaluated Qualifications Clause Samples
OEM Evaluated Qualifications. The listed criteria in Section 4.2 are weighted as follows: Company Profile and References 4.2.1 50.0 Ability to Supply NASPO ValuePoint Member States 4.2.2 50.0 Ability to Provide Technical Support to End Users 4.2.3 50.0 Qualifications and Technical Ability 4.2.4 25.0 Security 4.2.5 50.0 Environmental 4.2.6 25.0 The evaluation committee will tally the final scores for the OEM Evaluated Qualifications criteria to arrive at a consensus score by averaging the individual scores. Offerors that achieve the minimum score threshold of 162.5 points within the Stage 2 evaluation will proceed to the Stage 3 Category Qualification Evaluation. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s who do not achieve the required minimum score threshold will be disqualified and eliminated from further consideration.
OEM Evaluated Qualifications. 3.1 OEM EVALUATED QUALIFICATIONS
OEM Evaluated Qualifications. Offerors shall submit a point by point response to the OEM Evaluated Qualifications. The response should use the same section title and subsection numbering for ease in finding information during evaluation. Title this document upload – [Offeror Name] OEM Evaluated Qualifications
OEM Evaluated Qualifications. Offeror’s who meet all mandatory minimum requirements outlined above will then be evaluated on the qualifications detailed in Attachment B.1.
4.2.1 Company Profile and References
4.2.2 Ability to Supply NASPO ValuePoint Member States
4.2.3 Ability to Provide Technical Support to End Users
4.2.4 Qualifications and Technical Ability
OEM Evaluated Qualifications. Section 4 Product Mandatory Minimum Requirements and Evaluated Qualifications Section 5 Information Required in Submission of a Proposal Section 6 Proposal Evaluation Section 7 Proposal Award Processes Attachment A NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions Attachment B NASPO ValuePoint Detailed Sales Reporting Template Attachment C Acceptance Document Attachment D Cost Schedule Attachment E Standard and Premium Monolithic System Typical AND Standard and Premium Frame & Tile System Typical Attachment F Architectural Wall Typical Attachment G Workspace Furniture Scoresheet Attachment H Desks and Tables Scoresheet Attachment I Filing, Metal Storage, and Wood Case-Goods Scoresheet Attachment J Seating Scoresheet Attachment K Architectural Walls Scoresheet Attachment L Traditional Furniture Scoresheet Attachment M Mobile Portable Workstations Scoresheet Attachment N State Specific Terms and Conditions Issuing Procurement Unit State of Utah Division of Purchasing Conducting Procurement Unit State of Utah Division of Purchasing This Request for Proposals (“RFP”), having been determined to be the appropriate procurement method to provide the best value to the Conducting Procurement Unit, is designed to provide interested Offerors with sufficient basic information to submit proposals. It is not intended to limit a proposal's content or exclude any relevant or essential data. Offerors are at liberty and are encouraged to expand upon the specifications to evidence service capability. This RFP is issued in accordance with State of Utah Procurement Code, Utah Code Annotated (UCA) Chapter 63G-6a, and applicable Rules found in the Utah Administrative Code (UAC). If any provision of this RFP conflicts with the UCA or UAC, the UCA or UAC will take precedence.