Presentation of Findings. Contractor agrees to obtain the State's approval prior to publishing or making formal public presentations of statistical or analytical material based on its member enrollment.
Presentation of Findings. The third phase draws on the financial and claims analysis, and the review of processes and discussion, and results in development of a report setting findings and recommendations for improvement in leave recording systems, practices and procedures. Examples of issues that may be covered in such a report include: • STIIP/LTD reporting; • short and long term disability plan documentation; • submission of forms to and communication with appropriate agencies; • short and long term disability follow-up practices; • return to work procedures; • medical intervention; • supervisory roles and responsibilities at various levels; • claims and cost monitoring; and the review and analysis of past claims experience should determine priorities and assist in developing strategies that will be the most effective, and that reduce costs. It should also identify critical issues relating to control of short and long term disability and the changes that are necessary to meet the government's objectives.
Presentation of Findings. Wood will present the findings of the Moorings Bay Report in person at two public meetings: 1) to the City Council, and 2) to the Moorings Bay Citizens Advisory Committee. The deliverables for Task 2 are: Report outline and proposed statistical analyses for each data set Comprehensive draft and final report utilizing all available data (~2008-2020) Coordination of meetings and meeting minutes, including kick-off meeting Presentation of findings to City Council Presentation of findings to Moorings Bay Citizens Advisory Committee
Presentation of Findings. 5.1 Prior to completion of the Services, Mosela Rating Agency may supply oral, draft or interim reports (scorecard). In such circumstances, its final written report shall take precedence.
5.2 Mosela Rating Agency shall not be under any obligation in any circumstances to update any BEE verification report, for events occurring after the BEE verification report has been issued in final form. The Rated Entity may re-apply for rating should it wish to highlight changes to the application and underlying information.
5.3 Clause 5.2 falls away if the Rated Entity requests a re-rating based on the most recent updates of codes. This only applies at no cost to the Rated Entity, if the Rating is in its validity period, and no new information is accepted.
5.4 The rating will be valid for a 12 months period, after which period, the Rated Entity will be advised of its expiration. The Rated Entity can appoint Mosela Rating Agency to re-rate the entity as part of a separate agreement at that time. Should the Rated Entity wish to update their rating at any time during the validity of the report, this will be charged at an hourly rate, based on the time taken to update the report.
5.5 Any opinion, statement of expectation, forecast or recommendation supplied by Mosela Rating Agency as part of the services shall not amount to any form of guarantee that Mosela Rating Agency has determined or predicted future events or circumstances.
5.6 Any product of the services, excluding verification certificate and verification report, released to the client in any form or medium shall be supplied by MRA on the basis that it is for the client’s benefit and information only, that it shall not be copied, referred to or disclosed, in whole or in part, without our prior written consent.
5.7 The client consents MRA to send a copy of the B-BBEE verification report (scorecard) and B-BBEE verification certificate to the dti, only the B-BBEE verification certificate will be published on the dti’s BEE website.
5.8 The client also consents MRA to send a copy of the B-BBEE verification certificate to ABVA for publication on their website.
5.9 The client consents MRA to conduct the initial assessment at the client’s premises and also to provide its client file which has been verified to SANAS for the purpose of accreditation of MRA.
Presentation of Findings. 4.1. Prior to completion of the verification Service NC VERIFICATION AGENCY will supply a draft report of the findings for the measured entity to review and make comments on the findings.
4.2. On completion of the verification Service, NC VERIFICATION AGENCY shall present a signed final B-BBEE certificate and report.
4.3. NC VERIFICATION AGENCY shall not be under any obligation, whatsoever, to change any verification process advice, opinion, or report, after the final verification report has been issued.
4.4. The Client may apply for a Special Evaluation to update information in the same period as the original report issued. This can be done at a fee. Information outside the same period will be considered as a new verification.
4.5. Clause 4.2 falls away if the Client requests a re-rating based on the most updates codes from the Department of Trade and Industry. This only applies at no cost to the Client, if the Rating is in its validity period, and no new information is accepted.
4.6. A B-BBEE certificate issued by NC VERIFICATION AGENCY will be valid for a 12-month period, after which period, the Client will be notified of its expiration. The Client can appoint NC VERIFICATION AGENCY to re-rate the entity as part of a separate agreement at that time.
4.7. Any verification process advice, opinion, or simulations supplied by NC VERIFICATION AGENCY as part of the Services shall not amount to any form of guarantee that the actual verification outcomes will be the same.
Presentation of Findings. 4.1.1. Prepare Executive Summary
4.1.2. Prepare table of Historical Population and Employment Growth for political divisions along the CCOL
4.1.3. Prepare table of Forecasted Population and Employment Growth for 50-year outlook
4.1.4. Prepare exhibits of Toll Sensitivity Curves
4.1.5. Prepare Tables (up to three (3) implementation scenarios) for Traffic and Toll Revenue Forecasts (50-year outlook)
4.1.6. Prepare PowerPoint presentation of T&R Analysis and present briefing at scheduled CCTRA meeting/workshop. For this scope of services, up to two (2) briefings have been estimated.
Presentation of Findings. 6.1 Prior to completion of the services ARDENT Business Partners may supply oral, draft or interim advice or reports or presentations but in such circumstances its written advice or final written report shall take precedence.
Presentation of Findings. 8.1. XXXXX may, from time to time, issue interim advice, reports or presentations to the Measured Enterprise.
8.2. The Measured Enterprise hereby undertakes that it shall place no reliance upon any interim advice, reports or presentations as contemplated by clause 8.1 above and further acknowledges that the only binding documents upon which it may place reliance are the Verification Certificate and Scorecard issued by MS to the Measured Enterprise after the completion of the BEE Verification process.
8.3. Notwithstanding the provisions of clause 8.2 above, the advice and opinions supplied by MS to the Measured Enterprise (including such advice and opinions as may be contained in the Verification / Certificate and the Scorecard) shall in no way be construed or interpreted to mean that MS guarantees or warrants the contents of such advice or opinion.
8.4. MS shall not be under any obligation in any circumstances to update any advice, report or any product of the Services, oral or written, for events occurring after the advice, report or product concerned has been issued in final form, The Measured Enterprise may reapply for rating should it wish to highlight changes to the application and underlying information.
Presentation of Findings. Broker agrees to obtain EOHHS's approval prior to publishing or making formal public presentations of statistical or analytical material based on its Recipient enrollment. Broker will comply with the operational and information system requirements of HIPAA and will report requested data to EOHHS. Broker agrees to certify all data submitted. The certification must attest, based on best knowledge, information, and belief, as follows: • To the accuracy, completeness and truthfulness of the data. • To the accuracy, completeness and truthfulness of the documents specified by the State. Broker must submit the certification concurrently with the certified data. Broker shall have written policies and procedures to monitor TP performance and utilization of services by its recipients and to assure the quality and accessibility to nonemergency medical transportation.
Presentation of Findings. How to start the institutional cooperation relationship? This question is the starting point of this research. There are many other aspects come from the interviews as well. I will start with the most easily categorized data-the story of the cooperation. Thus, here I list the findings/topics matrix from the interview, there are 6 main questions being asked to the three respondents who are in charge of the cooperation or know the cooperation most with possible preliminary explanations and notable quota from the interviews if applicable. The listed explanations will be further addressed in the next chapter. To better understand this matrix, I will enclose the important part of each interview in the appendix, it is quite useful. After the summary, the findings in form themes will be presented.
