PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE Sample Clauses

PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE. 21.1 The Board may dismiss a teacher on the basis of less than satisfactory teaching performance where the Board has received at least three (3) reports prepared in accordance with Article E.24 (Evaluation of Teaching), each indicating less than satisfactory performance or two (2) reports in the case of teachers who are in their first eight (8) months of employment with the Board. i. The reports shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) or more than twenty-four (24) months and not less than four (4) or more than eight (8) months when two (2) reports are required for dismissal. ii. Absences on sick leave or other leaves of absence shall not be included in the calculation of the period referred to in this section. iii. Where a teacher is absent on sick leave or other leave for greater than one (1) month, any subsequent evaluation or continuation of an evaluation which has already commenced, will not occur for at least one (1) month, or at least two (2) months if the absence is greater than six (6) months, or at least three (3) months if the absence is greater than one (1) year. Such a period shall not be included in the calculation of the period referred to in this Article C.21.1.a.i. iv. The reports referred to in paragraph (a) shall have been prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E.24.5 (Evaluation of Teaching) of this Agreement. b. At least one of the reports shall be a report of the Superintendent of Schools or the Assistant Superintendent of Schools. c. The other report(s) shall include reports of: i. the Superintendent of Schools, or the Assistant Superintendent of Schools; ii. the Director of Instruction; iii. the Principal of the school to which the teacher is assigned; iv. the Principal of another school within the district which is the same level as the school in which the teacher is assigned. 21.2 The reports shall be written by two different evaluators. Where three (3) reports are required, the third report shall be prepared by a third evaluator if requested by the teacher. 21.3 The report writers shall not collaborate in writing any report. 21.4 Where a teacher receives a less than satisfactory report, the teacher: a. may request a transfer, in which case the Board shall make all reasonable efforts to arrange the transfer of the teacher to a mutually agreeable assignment or school; or b. may, when three (3) reports are required for the dismissal of the teacher, request and shall be granted leave of ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE a. The Board shall not dismiss a teacher on the basis of less than satisfactory performance of teaching duties except where the Board has received at least three reports pursuant to this Article indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory.
Sample 1Sample 2
PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE. C21.1 The Board shall not dismiss a teacher except where the Board has received three (3) reports pursuant to Article E22 of this Agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. C21.2 The reports referred to in C21.1 shall be prepared in accordance with the process established in Article E22 (Evaluation of Teachers) of this Agreement, and in accordance with the following conditions: 2.1 the reports shall have been issued in a period of not less than 12 or more than 24 months;
Sample 1Sample 2
PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE. 21.1 The Board may dismiss a teacher on the basis of less than satisfactory teaching performance where the Board has received at least three (3) reports prepared in accordance with Article E.24 (Evaluation of Teaching), each indicating less than satisfactory performance or two (2) reports in the case of teachers who are in their first eight (8) months of employment with the Board. i. The reports shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) or more than twenty-four (24) months and not less than four (4) or more than eight (8) months when two
Sample 1Sample 2
PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE a. The Board shall not dismiss a teacher on the basis of less than satisfactory performance of teaching duties except where the Board has received at least three reports pursuant to this Article indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory. b. The reports shall have been issued in a period of not less than 12 or more than 24 months, such period not to include the time during which the teacher is on an approved leave-of-absence. c. i. At least one of the reports shall be a report of the Superintendent of Schools, or the Assistant Superintendent of Schools.
Sample 1Sample 2
PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE. 2.1 The Board may dismiss a teacher on the basis of less than satisfactory teaching performance where the Board has received at least three (3) reports prepared in accordance with Article E.5 (Evaluation of Teaching), each indicating less than satisfactory performance or two (2) reports in the case of teachers who are in their first eight (8) months of employment with the Board. (a) The reports shall have been issued in a period of not less than twelve (12) or more than twenty-four (24) months and not less than four (4) or more than eight (8) months when two (2) reports are required for dismissal. (b) Absences on sick leave or other leaves of absence shall not be included in the calculation of the period referred to in this section. (c) Where a teacher is absent on sick leave or other leave for greater than one (1) month, any subsequent evaluation or continuation of an evaluation which has already commenced, will not occur for at least one (1) month, or at least two
Sample 1

Related to PROCEDURES WHERE DISMISSAL IS BASED ON PERFORMANCE

  • Performance while Dispute is Pending Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • File Management and Record Retention relating to CRF Eligible Persons or Households Grantee must maintain a separate file for every applicant, Eligible Person, or Household, regardless of whether the request was approved or denied. a. Contents of File: Each file must contain sufficient and legible documentation. Documents must be secured within the file and must be organized systematically.

  • Selection Based on Consultants’ Qualifications Services estimated to cost less than $100,000 equivalent per contract may be procured under contracts awarded in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1, 3.7 and 3.8 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Geographic Area and Sector Specific Allowances, Conditions and Exceptions The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant. Where the Employer does work which falls under the following headings, the Employer agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Reviewing Contract Performance The Contractor shall work with the Authority to establish and maintain an effective and beneficial working relationship to ensure the Contract is delivered to at least the minimum required standard as specified in the Schedule (The Services).

  • Attachment C, Standard State Provisions for Contracts and Grants Attachment C is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the Attachment C December 15, 2017 attached to this Amendment. Child Support (Applicable to natural persons only; not applicable to corporations, partnerships or LLCs). Contractor is under no obligation to pay child support or is in good standing with respect to or in full compliance with a plan to pay any and all child support payable under a support order as of the date of this amendment.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than Quality and Cost-based Selection, which may be used for consultants’ services. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used. (a) Quality-based Selection (b) Selection under a Fixed Budget

  • Limitation of Vendor Indemnification and Similar Clauses This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, is prohibited from indemnifying third-parties (pursuant to the Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution) except as otherwise specifically provided for by law or as ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution states that "no debt shall be created by or on behalf of the State … " and the Texas Attorney General has opined that a contractually imposed obligation of indemnity creates a "debt" in the constitutional sense. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. MW-475 (1982). Thus, contract clauses which require TIPS to indemnify Vendor, pay liquidated damages, pay attorney's fees, waive Vendor's liability, or waive any applicable statute of limitations must be deleted or qualified with ''to the extent permitted by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas." Does Vendor agree? Yes, I Agree TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Vendor agrees that TIPS and TIPS Members shall not be liable for interest or late-payment fees on past-due balances at a rate higher than permitted by the laws or regulations of the jurisdiction of the TIPS Member. Funding-Out Clause: Vendor agrees to abide by the applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to Texas Local Government Code § 271.903, or any other statutory or regulatory limitation of the jurisdiction of any TIPS Member, which requires that contracts approved by TIPS or a TIPS Member are subject to the budgeting and appropriation of currently available funds by the entity or its governing body.

  • Certification of Funds; Budget and Fiscal Provisions; Termination in the Event of Non-Appropriation This Agreement is subject to the budget and fiscal provisions of the City’s Charter. Charges will accrue only after prior written authorization certified by the Controller, and the amount of City’s obligation hereunder shall not at any time exceed the amount certified for the purpose and period stated in such advance authorization. This Agreement will terminate without penalty, liability or expense of any kind to City at the end of any fiscal year if funds are not appropriated for the next succeeding fiscal year. If funds are appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year, this Agreement will terminate, without penalty, liability or expense of any kind at the end of the term for which funds are appropriated. City has no obligation to make appropriations for this Agreement in lieu of appropriations for new or other agreements. City budget decisions are subject to the discretion of the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors. Contractor’s assumption of risk of possible non-appropriation is part of the consideration for this Agreement. THIS SECTION CONTROLS AGAINST ANY AND ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!