PROCESS REVIEW Sample Clauses

PROCESS REVIEW. The parties to this Agreement agree that a review will take place within three (3) years from the Execution Date to determine if the provisions in sections 11.02 to 11.04, inclusive, and Schedule 6 require adjustment or amendment and, where agreed upon, such required changes shall be made, and such adjustments as are subsequently agreed upon shall thereafter be made from time to time with the agreement in writing of the affected parties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROCESS REVIEW. At the conclusion of the oral exam process the President of the Union or a designee agreed to by the Human Resources Director will be afforded an opportunity to meet with the oral board to review the process. Within one (1) month of the conclusion of the promotional exam two (2) members of the Human Resources Department will meet with two (2) representatives of the Union and one (1) representative of Fire Administration to review the examination.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
PROCESS REVIEW. In the event that a bargaining unit applicant is not selected, that employee may request, and shall be given in writing, his or her itemized score and placement according to test results within one week of the request.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
PROCESS REVIEW. To determine whether the hearing was conducted in accordance with published procedures and without bias on the part of the Hearing Administrator or any CSB member. Deviations from designated procedures will not be a basis for sustaining an appeal unless significant prejudice results.
Sample 1Sample 2
PROCESS REVIEW. Plantronics has the right to review GoerTek 's manufacturing and quality assurance processes and to requalify the Product periodically upon notice to GoerTek . GoerTek will implement all necessary changes required by Plantronics based upon its review of GoerTek’s procedures.
Sample 1
PROCESS REVIEW. In the event the Manager pays income from a Fund, the Depositary will check via the (half) yearly report and, if applicable, the minutes of the meeting in which a decision has been made to pay those amounts, whether calculations have been performed correctly in accordance with the Conditions of a Fund and Regulations.
Sample 1
PROCESS REVIEW. The MPO and TDOT will review this agreement in conjunction with each Statewide Planning Finding or when STIP/TIP management procedures are substantively changed (e.g., implementation of an electronic STIP/TIP). The focus of the review is to verify the appropriate use of the agreed-to amendment and administrative modification processes and consistency with Federal regulations. We, the undersigned, approve this Memorandum of Agreement. This Agreement will become effective upon approval of signature by all parties, and will remain in effect as long as each agency agrees to and abides by the conditions set forth in this document. This Agreement may be amended at any time, but revisions will require signature by all parties. Any signatory to this Agreement may propose amendment to the agreement at any time. All prior agreements and correspondence related to the definition and need for amendments or administrative modifications to STIP/TIPs are voided with the execution of this agreement. Mayor Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Date TPO Executive Board Chair Commissioner Date Tennessee Department of Transportation
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROCESS REVIEW. The parties agree to conduct quarterly meetings between to review account management for Non-US Exclusive Countries and the US. The US meeting shall include focus on worldwide issues. Timing of such quarterly meetings shall be scheduled to be close to the dates that EI board meetings or held, or such other dates as are mutually agreed on by the parties. Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 The parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date. MICROSOFT CORPORATION EXPEDIA, INC. By /s/ Xxxxxxx Xxxx By /s/ Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx -------------------------------- -------------------------------- Name (Print) Xxxxxxx Xxxx Name (Print) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx ---------------------- ---------------------- Title VP-MSN US Region Title Sr. Vice President and ----------------------------- Chief Financial Officer ----------------------------- [SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED MSN/EXPEDIA CARRIAGE AND CROSS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROMOTION AGREEMENT.] --------------------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Exhibit A --------- Mock-Up of the Network ---------------------- Template -------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Mock-Up of the Co-Branded Site Home Page ---------------------------------------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Mock-Up of the Co-Branded Site Home Page ---------------------------------------- Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Exhibit B --------- List of EI Named Competitors EI Named Competitors in Exclusive Countries: US |X| Travelocity |X| HRN |X| Orbitz |X| Cheaptickets |X| Sidestep |X| Priceline |X| Hotwire UK |X| Travelocity |X| Xxxxxx Xxxx |X| British Airways |X| Lastminute |X| Ebookers Canada |X| Travelocity |X| Groupe Transat |X| Air Canada |X| Tripeze |X| iTravel2000 Germany |X| Travelocity |X| Travel-Overland |X| TravelChannel |X| Ebookers |X| Travel24 France |X| Travelocity |X| Lastminute |X| Nouvelles Frontieres |X| Travelprice |X| Promovacances EI Named Competitors in non-exclusive countries |X| Travelocity |X| HRN |X| Lastminute |X| Ebookers |X| OTP Amended & Restated MSN/Expedia Carriage Agreement FINAL -- June 29, 2001 Exhibit C --------- List of Essential Travel Elements 1. Purchase of airline tickets 2. Hotel reservations...
Sample 1
PROCESS REVIEW. True Up and Qualifying Hours Reduction, Work-Unit Rebid and Layoff will be discussed at the JLMC meeting that follows the utilization of this section.
Sample 1

Related to PROCESS REVIEW

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!