Project Limitations. If Company determines in good faith that a Project Proposal conflicts with any then-existing use or business operations conducted by Company or Third Parties on the Lands, including then-existing oil and gas operations, Produced Water and/or Recycled Water operations (each, a “Project Limitation”), Company shall notify Operator in writing of such determination and the basis therefor within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the Project Proposal, and the Parties shall negotiate in good faith for not less than thirty (30) days to amend the Project Proposal. If the Parties are unable to mutually agree on a revised Project Proposal within such thirty (30)-day period, then Operator shall not pursue such Additional Facility. For the avoidance of doubt, if Company does not provide written notice of any objection to a Project Proposal that is subject to a Project Limitation within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the Project Proposal, Company shall be deemed to have accepted and consented to such Project Proposal for all purposes to the extent that Company is not expressly prohibited from doing so by a valid existing instrument to which Company is a party.
Project Limitations. If Company determines in good faith that a Project Proposal conflicts with any then-existing use or business operations conducted by Company or Third Parties on the Lands, including then-existing oil and gas operations, Produced Water and/or Recycled Water operations (each, a “Project Limitation”), Company shall notify Operator in writing of such determination and the basis therefor within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the Project Proposal, and the Parties shall negotiate in good faith for not less than thirty (30) days to amend the Project Proposal; provided that any Project Proposal to locate a Disposal Well within one (1) mile of any other existing Disposal Well, existing Third Party disposal well, or Permit operated or held by Operator or any other Person shall in each case be deemed to conflict with then-existing Produced Water operations and, following Company’s notice to Operator of the Project Limitation, Company shall have no further obligations to consider or negotiate such Project Proposal with Operator. If the Parties are unable to mutually agree on a revised Project Proposal within such thirty (30)-day period, then Operator shall not pursue such Additional Facility. For the avoidance of doubt, if Company does not provide written notice of any objection to a Project Proposal that is subject to a Project Limitation within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the Project Proposal, Company shall be deemed to have accepted and consented to such Project Proposal for all purposes to the extent that Company is not expressly prohibited from doing so by a valid existing instrument to which Company is a party.
Project Limitations. The main challenge in gaining a better quantitative understanding of the sources of GHG emissions and the potential options to mitigate impacts arises from the diffuse nature of the ODS/HFC bank sources. This applies to all the foam containing applications reviewed by this project, but was particularly challenging for transport refrigerated units and the lesser applications of marine buoyancy and consumer products like cooler boxes. As a consequence, the project team did need to make assumptions on historical stock development. These assumptions are shown in the main body of the report where relevant, and also in summary Table 3-28 in Section 3.7.1. Apart from obtaining stock data from the 1960’s onward, the project also had to capture foam and blowing agent content and changes over the decades. Many of the screening interview respondents were unable to be specific on stock and insulation volumes or changes within their sectors. Neither were they well informed about the impact of underlying drivers (such as Title 24 for building insulation content) affecting foam use over time. Nor was this information always available from foam producers. As a consequence, the project team had to rely on published data combined with assumptions on foam consumption growth rates.
Project Limitations. The Project is research. As such, SFU does not represent that the Project will lead to any particular result, nor does it guarantee a successful outcome to the Project.
Project Limitations. A. The project must not involve duplication of sabbatical leave projects, or column advancement course work. Exception: Course work may be applied to move from Column A to B or from Column E to F at the time the degree is awarded. (Duplication refers to context, not to methodology. Chairing major college committees could be used for more than one growth step).
Project Limitations. From the date of this Agreement until the termination of this Agreement (or the termination of this Section 2 pursuant to Section 5(b)), neither Cottonmouth and its Affiliates nor any Verde Company will directly or indirectly construct, install, own, operate, acquire, or acquire a material equity interest in, any Project in the AMI (or offer to any Person the opportunity to jointly pursue any Project in the AMI, or enter into any joint venture or arrangement (including any license arrangement) of any kind or character with respect to any Project in the AMI) without first fully complying with Section 3 with respect to such Project. For the avoidance of doubt, Cottonmouth and its Affiliates and any Verde Company may freely pursue any Project with respect to which a Notice (as defined below) specific to such Project has been delivered to OpCo or Cottonmouth, as applicable, pursuant to Section 3(a) and for which OpCo or Cottonmouth, as applicable, has failed to timely deliver an Exercise Notice (as defined below) before the end of the Election Period (as defined below); provided, however, that with respect to any Project for which Notice has been delivered and OpCo or Cottonmouth, as applicable, has failed to timely deliver an Exercise Notice before the end of the Election Period, if such Project shall have materially changed or if construction of such Project shall not have materially commenced within three years from the date of the original Notice, a new Notice pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement shall be required.
Project Limitations. The main challenge in gaining a better quantitative understanding of the sources of GHG emissions and the potential options to mitigate impacts arises from the diffuse nature of the ODS/HFC bank sources. This applies to all the foam containing applications reviewed by this project, but was particularly challenging for transport refrigerated units and the lesser applications of marine buoyancy and consumer products like cooler boxes. As a consequence, the project team did need to make assumptions on historical stock development. Theses assumptions are shown in the 5 Analysis of Costs to Xxxxx International Ozone Depleting Substance Substitute Emissions; US EPA, 2005 main body of the report where relevant, and also in a summary table in Section 3.8, Page 57. Apart from obtaining stock data from the 1960’s onward, the project also had to capture foam & blowing agent content and changes over the decades. Many of the screening interview respondents were unable to be specific on stock and insulation volumes or changes within their sectors. Neither were they well informed about the impact of underlying drivers (such as Title 24 for building insulation content) affecting foam use over time. Nor was this information always available from foam producers. As a consequence, the project team had to rely on published data combined with assumptions on foam consumption growth rates. As noted in Section 2.3, following the ‘kick-off’ meeting in July 2008, the California Air Resources Board was obliged to place a temporary stoppage on the project while the State budget was being confirmed. As a result of this delay there was a subsequent scheduling conflict involving one of our project team members. This meant that the contractor could not complete the allocated tasks which were then reallocated back to Caleb for later delivery. This had additional impacts on the delivery timetable but these were minimized to the extent possible.
