Ridership Sample Clauses

Ridership. Number of one-way trips provided to seniors and individuals with disabilities through traditional 5310 projects. Other Section 5310 Projects: • Enhancements to services that impact transportation for seniors and individuals with disabilities. • Enhancements to physical infrastructure that impact transportation services for seniors and individuals with disabilities through other 5310 projects. • Number of one-way trips provided for seniors and individuals with disabilities through other 5310 projects. This information will be used to report performance indicators to the Federal Transit Administration that will be used in measuring relevant outputs, service levels and outcomes for the Section 5310 program.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ridership. The Bus Company shall provide to the District a report indicating the number of riders assigned to each bus route and the number of students actually riding the bus by the last school day of September of each year. Bus ridership shall be measured by a weekly ridership count taken daily on each route during the third week in September of each year and, upon the request by the District, at least one day each month during the school year. The Bus Company shall provide to the District records of all elementary routes that demonstrate specifically which students actually rode each route at least one time during the school year by May 15 of each year.
Ridership. In Fiscal Year 2016/2017, SunLine Transit Agency served 4.1 million fixed route passenger boardings, a decrease of 4.8% from the previous year. In the same year, it operated over 3.4 million miles and 238,374 hours of revenue service. Customer growth on SunLine’s paratransit saw a small increase. In FY 2016/2017, SunLine 10 served 164,802 passengers, a 0.5% increase from FY 2015/2016.
Ridership. ‌ The following figures provide ridership information in terms of average weekday boardings for the different individual transit services within the UPA corridor, and for all the corridor services combined, between January 2008 and March 2009. This data point is likely to be in error according to MDT staff Figure 11 - 95 Express Bus - Average Weekday Boardings (Northbound and Southbound) Figure 12 - Route 77 and 277 - Average Weekday Boardings (Northbound and Southbound) Figure 13 - Tri-Rail UPA Corridor - Average Weekday Boardings (Northbound and Southbound) Figure 14 - Total UPA Corridor Boardings (Northbound and Southbound) Table 10 - Average Weekday Boardings – Pre and Post Deployment Comparison (Northbound and Southbound) Jan 08 - Mar 08 Jan 09 - Mar 09 % change 95 Express 1,813 2,353 29.8% Route 277 1,363 1,262 -7.4% Route 77 10,917 9,824 -10.0% Tri Rail UPA Corridor 2,673 2,686 0.5% Total UPA Corridor with Tri-Rail 16,766 16,126 -3.8% Total UPA Corridor without Tri-Rail 14,093 13,439 -4.6% Figure 11 shows that 95 Express ridership remained between 1,500 and 2,000 riders per day from January 2008 through Fall 2008 (the low November 2008 value has been identified as suspect by MDT staff, likely due to transitioning to a new ridership data collection system around that time), before increasing to over 2,000 riders per day in December 2008, coinciding with Express Lanes implementation. The first three months show a continued rise in ridership up to 2,500 riders by March 2009. This represents an average ridership increase of 540 riders (29.8% increase) when comparing average ridership during the first three months of 2008 and 2009, as shown in Table 10. Looking at Figure 12, it can be seen that ridership on Routes 277 and 77 both dropped slightly over the 15 month evaluation period, with the same low-point observed in December 2008, again likely due to the holiday season. Comparing the first three months of 2008 and 2009, Route 77 ridership decreased by 10 percent while Route 277 ridership decreased by
Ridership. Not Billable to Wichita Transit *Non-ADA Rides (includes Medical Rides, JARC rides not Reimbursed by WT) *New Freedom rides Total Other Rides Provided Maintenance Statistics PM’s Scheduled: PM’s Completed: Total Chargeable Road Calls: Total Accidents: End of Statistical Reporting (Wichita Transit can supply an Excel spreadsheet for this report to you if needed) Appendix B U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) FTA REQUIRED CONTRACT CLAUSES THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AND MADE A PART OF ANY CONTRACT FTA REQUIRED CONTRACT CLAUSES Bolded items are required and therefore included in this document. “N/A” indicates items that are not included because they are not required.
Ridership. First priority will be given to those requesting 5 days both am and pm ○ Ridership will be monitored quarterly; if ridership does not meet the volume noted on this form, parents may be requested to give up their child(xxx)’s seat(s). ● Second priority will be given to 5 days pm OR 5 days am #2 Reason for Request as noted on your Bus Seat Request.
Ridership. DXE, Caltrans and CHSRA agree to work together to enhance ridership and the customer experience in connection with current and planned high-speed, intercity, and regional train services. The Parties may engage in additional ridership studies to assess ridership demand throughout the Southwest Region.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ridership. Ridership for each route and type of service shall be shown on a monthly and year- to-date basis. Report shall show breakdown of ridership by service, route and fare category showing number and percentage of total ridership for regular, senior, disabled, college, youth, child, wheelchair, transfers, bike users, companions, and free rides on a monthly and year-to-date basis. Additionally, the average number of riders per day shall be reported.
Ridership. Describes peak-hour/peak-direction ridership and capacity on the project as well as overall ridership in the corridor.
Ridership. System-wide ridership declined from 275.7 million in 2015 to 266.6 million in 2019, yielding a -0.8 percent CAGR. However, the ridership trend varied by type of service: • Bus ridership declined from 162.5 million in 2015 to 151.1 million, yielding a -1.8 percent CAGR. Ridership per VRM fell at a slightly higher rate (-2.1 percent CAGR) due to expanded bus services in this period. • Rail ridership increased from 111.9 million in 2015 to 113.9 million in 2019, yielding a 0.4 percent CAGR. Ridership per VRM grew at a slightly higher rate (2.2 percent CAGR) due to a decrease in rail services in this period. • Demand response ridership increased from 1.40 million in 2015 to 1.71 million in 2019, yielding a 5.1 percent CAGR. Ridership per VRM grew at a lower rate (0.3 percent CAGR) due to the extent of demand response service expansion in this period. In summary, the loss in system-wide ridership between 2015 and 2016 was due exclusively to losses in bus system ridership. Fare Revenue Fare revenue grew from $929 million in 2015 to $974 million in 2019, yielding a
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.