Scenario. The Institution owns the Results and grants the Collaborator a non-exclusive licence to use the Results. The Collaborator has the right to call on the Institution to negotiate an assignment. THIS AGREEMENT dated […………………………………………..] 201[] is made BETWEEN:
Scenario. To provide a straightforward evaluation, the selected evalu- ation scenario describes the application of the approach using the response time metric, which is a QoS-related (e.g., latency, throughput, and packet loss) SLA. The metrics in QoS- related SLAs are quantitative, being able to be automatically verified in the SC. Nevertheless, the designed approach can be modified to fit different types of SLAs, such as service availability. The evaluation scenario was composed of a web server and a client performing periodic requests. A Raspberry Pi model B with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU @ 900 MHz, 1 GB of RAM, and a 150 Mbps Wi-Fi dongle hosted an Apache web server, and a Lenovo ThinkPad T430 with a quad-core Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90 GHz, 16 GB of RAM, and a 1 Gbps Ethernet connection performed the requests as the client. The client requested at every 1 s a PHP page that performed random calculations to introduce load in the server. Moreover, after each finished request, the client retrieved the response time of the request and stored this value in a Comma- Separated-Value (CSV) file. × During a 30 minutes interval, 1800 requests were performed and measured (30 min 60 s = 1800); the response times of these requests are depicted in Figure 2. It can be seen in the graph that the majority of the requests were answered in 0.2 s to 0.3 s, and that there are requests with response times over 0.6 s. The average response time for the period was 0.2445 s. Based on these values, the violation threshold was fixed to 0.3 s, which is depicted using a red dashed line in the graph. Web Server Response Time 0.9 0.8 Response Time (seconds) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 000 000 000 1200 1500 1800 Request Response Time Violation Threshold Fig. 2: Response Time between the Client and the Web Server Listing 6: Compensate and Deposit Functions
Scenario. 2 applies to employees who are appointed to a role to which this clause 45 applies but who act in a position not covered by this Agreement (that is, a senior contract position). Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Salary Paid the salary for the position as described in Appendix 1A for the period of acting. *Greater of: • the minimum remuneration for the senior contract position; or • a higher grade rate set by their General Manager /managers where applicable; or • their current rate. Leave Any form of leave during the first 13 weeks of the acting higher grade, the period of leave will not attract the higher rate of payment. Any form of leave during the first 13 weeks of the acting higher grade, the period of leave will not attract the higher rate of payment. Conditions Shall work in accordance with the conditions of this clause 46 while acting Shall work in accordance with the conditions of this clause while acting. Employees who are not appointed to a role to which this clause 46 applies but who act in a position under this clause 46 are not entitled to either: • take; or • accrue rostered day off during the period of acting.
Scenario. A stakeholder (facilitator’s choice) receives a disclosure from a youth regarding a sexual trauma 2. The following roles will be utilized during this activity:(Participants may volunteer to personify each role - each volunteer should have a name tag with their title) a. Judge b. Lawyer c. Guardian ad litem d. Social worker e. Nurse f. Teacher x. Xxxxxx parent h. Therapist i. Biological parent 3. Pass out the tape while participants are standing in a straight line a. Each participant should hold on to the tape as it passes them, the last participant should hold the remainder of the roll (this end of the tape should still have a lot of slack) b. Ask the participants to arrange themselves in a way that encourages communication (as opposed to a straight line where stakeholders can only communicate with those directly next to them) i. Typically, participants will arrange themselves in a circle 4. Participants will pass the tape (beginning with the stakeholder that has the end of the roll,) representing their line of communication, to each other as they discuss what actions they would take and who they would communicate with in the given scenario a. This should create a web-like structure, illustrating how various stakeholders can communicate with each other creating a supportive network for the youth b. If there are two trainers, one should stand in the middle of the circle representing the youth in the scenario i. This is beneficial in the sense that stakeholders can communicate directly with the youth and the other trainer can guide the scenario as necessary
Scenario. Registering a consumer and supplier to receive and supply anEvent using the PUSH method.
Scenario. Start a UI and its associated activity. This is another pattern for starting a unit of work (which involves launching a user interface). In this case, a user would launch a user interface, which would then “attach” itself to an activity. The activity that the user interface “attaches” itself to can be a new activity that the user interface would startup or a currently “running” activity that the UI would invoke operations on. aUserInterface anActivity open() startup()
Scenario. 1 Employee 1: “I’m worried about being liable for protecting PHI.” Employee 2: “Oh, don’t worry! We don’t really have to worry about HIPAA compliance, our managers handle that stuff.” Is this accurate information: • Yes, only those employees who directly handle PHI need to comply with HIPAA. • No, everyone, regardless of your role, needs to know and comply with HIPAA. Scenario 2
Scenario. 1: Teacher Sets Up Gamified Lesson Plan This first scenario shows what happens, when the teacher creates a gamified lesson plan, Figure
Scenario. Each Party owns the IPR in the Results which it creates and grants each of the other Parties a non-exclusive licence to use those Results for the purposes of the Project and for any other purpose, so that any Party may exploit any of the Results. THIS AGREEMENT dated [ ] 201[] is made BETWEEN:
Scenario. SPECIFICATIONS ▪ Time horizon. ▪ Qualitative aspects: storylines, methods, drivers. ▪ Quantitative aspects: models, methods, data.
