Siting. If the dwelling type described herein cannot be sited or built on the Property in accordance with the requirements of the municipality or any architectural control committee having jurisdiction in respect of the Property, the Vendor or Purchaser may cancel this Agreement and shall be entitled to a refund of any deposit(s) paid, without interest, but in no event shall the Vendor or the Vendor’s agent be liable for any damages or costs whatsoever.
Siting a. No portion of any WCF may extend beyond the ROW without prior approval(s).
Siting. 3.4.1 The building’s siting, bulk and scale shall comply with the following:
Siting. 7.8 The Operator shall physically deliver electricity produced by the Windpower Facilities at the point ("Point of Delivery") where the Transmission Facilities are connected to the conductors of a transmission and/or distribution service provider under the jurisdiction of the Louisiana Public Service Commission (“LPSC”) that owns and maintains a transmission distribution system on or near the Property for the wholesale delivery and subsequent transportation of energy; including a municipally owned utility or rural electric cooperative (a "TDSP"); provided, however, that Operator may sell or arrange for the sale of such electricity at delivery points other than the Point of Delivery, in which event, unregulated delivery charges assessed to Operator, including scheduling fees, congestion management fees, load management fees and all other fees, shall be the responsibility of Operator and shall not be separately charged or otherwise invoiced to the State nor deducted from the calculation of Gross Revenues.
Siting. Develop a risk-assessment and decision-making framework – and related best practices – that integrate consideration of social, environmental, and economic issues in siting large-scale solar projects.
Siting. Mitigation projects may be located on the same lot as the development or on another lot within the Xxxxx International Tradeport. BIBLIOGRAPHY Development Plan Update; September 1995; Prepared for Peace Development ----------------------- Authority by VHB/Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Brustlin, Inc., EDAW, Inc., RKG Associates, Inc., Xxxxx Xxxxxx & Associates, Xxx X. Xxxxxx, Inc. and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx & Halle. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Disposal and Reuse of PAFB, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NH; August 1995; Prepared by Department of the Air Force, et al. -- Memorandum of Findings Portsmouth/Newington, New Hampshire: #10102 Mitigation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alternatives; March 23, 1990 and May 7, 1990; Prepared for NH Department of ------------ Transportation by the Smart Associates, Environmental Consultants, Inc. Technical Report of Wetlands within FAA Study Area; June 7, 1991; Prepared for ---------------------------------------------------------------- Advanced Sciences, Inc. by the Smart Associates, Environmental Consultants, Inc. Wetlands Delineation and Evaluation Report for the Xxxxx International ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Tradeport; June 1992; Prepare for Xxxxx Development Authority by Fugro- --------- XxXxxxxxx.
Siting. The Alliance will site a CO2 storage facility and associated pipeline network to initially service the Upstream Project planned to be located in Meredosia, Illinois. However, the Alliance’s design and siting effort may consider, to the extent permitted by funding and schedule, a storage facility that could accept CO2 from other industrial sources in the future. Ameren’s facility in Meredosia, Illinois is planned as the host site for the FutureGen 2.0 – Oxy- Combustion Large Scale Test. At Meredosia, CO2 will be captured and delivered to the Alliance at the plant gate. The Alliance will identify a short list of candidate CO2 storage sites and identify the pipeline routes between the Meredosia plant and the candidate sites. As part of determining which sites are considered for final selection, the Alliance will engage DOE in consultations regarding the ability of the candidate sites to meet all minimum DOE and Alliance requirements. If it is indeterminate as to whether any candidate sites can meet the minimum requirements, then DOE and the Alliance will determine a mutually agreeable course of action and if deemed necessary develop a set of interim deliverables for the balance of the siting process. The Alliance may subsequently perform additional due diligence, including seismic surveys on one or more of sites considered candidates for final selection. With DOE concurrence, the Alliance may secure various rights at one or more sites. The Alliance will announce a preferred site by early 2011. If the preferred site is not characterized sufficiently to assure reasonable success of the project, the Alliance may identify one back-up site for inclusion in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). In support of DOE’s EIS, the Alliance will provide the necessary site characterization information for the CO2 storage site(s) and the pipeline route. The Alliance may also provide information regarding existing regional CO2 sources and existing rights-of-way that could be used for establishing the FutureGen 2.0 CO2 pipeline network. The following activities will be conducted: • Conduct outreach to interested host sites and the communities surrounding those sites • Develop criteria for acceptable sites and for evaluation of the proposals. The Alliance recognizes that they are developing specific site acceptance and selection criteria • Develop Request for Proposals (RFP) for prospective offerors • Evaluate the proposals received • Develop a short-list of candidate sites....
Siting. The Proposed Building shall be sited as generally illustrated on Schedule B.
Siting. The siting process for the CO2 storage site was completed under Phase I and no siting activities are planned for Sub-Phase 2A. Details of this activity can be found in the Phase I Progress Report submitted as part of the Phase 2 – Best and Final DPA.
