State Review by State Authority. The State conducts program reviews for purposes of State approval and to inform CAEP accreditation. An EPP undergoing the State Review option will follow State guidelines. The State provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State standards for licensure/certificate program approval. Upon an EPP’s completion of the State authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. The State makes the final decision on the approval of any program. The CAEP Evaluation Team will consider evidence that the EPP presents as gathered from the State Review process to meet the sufficiency criteria related to CAEP Standard 1, Component R1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard RA1, Component RA1.2 (Advanced).
State Review by State Authority. The State conducts program reviews for purposes of State approval and to inform CAEP Accreditation. An EPP selecting the State Review option will follow State guidelines. The State provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State standards for program approval. Upon an EPP's completion of the State authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. The State makes the final decision on the approval of any program.
State Review by State Authority. TSPC conducts program reviews for purposes of state approval and to inform CAEP Accreditation. An EPP undergoing the State Review option will follow TSPC guidelines. TSPC provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State standards for licensure/certificate program approval. Upon an EPP’s completion of TSPC authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. TSPC makes the final decision on the approval of any program. The CAEP Evaluation Team will consider evidence that the EPP presents as gathered from the State Review process to meet the sufficiency criteria related to CAEP Standard 1, Component R1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard RA1, Component RA1.2 (Advanced).
State Review by State Authority. The State conducts program reviews for the purposes of State approval and informs CAEP accreditation. An EPP selecting the State Review option will follow State guidelines. The State provides a platform (the Provider Reporting System: PRS-II) and guidance on how to address Standard 1 and Georgia-specific Standard 6 for program approval. Upon an EPP’s completion of PRS- II, GaPSC-trained Site Visitors are selected and assigned. Site Visitors make recommendations for further action and/or state approval. The joint site team will utilize all state reports and evidence provided in support of the state program approval review process, which coincides with the EPP accreditation review process. The State makes the final decision on the approval of any program as it relates to State policy and requirements. (See Appendix B.)
State Review by State Authority. KSDE conducts program reviews for purposes of state approval and to inform state and CAEP Accreditation. KSDE provides forms and instructions on how to meet all state standards for licensure program approval. Upon an EPP's completion of the KSDE forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. The Kansas State Board of Education makes the final decision on the approval of any program.
5.16.1.1. KSDE shall request a review by SPAs to determine how closely aligned KSDE program standards are to the SPA standards. XXXx will submit program reports following the instructions for the selected specialized content program review process detailed in the Kansas Institutional Handbook for Program Approval.
5.16.1.2. The Kansas State Board of Education has sole responsibility for program approval. The Evaluation Review Committee (ERC) will utilize information generated from KSDE review process to make recommendations regarding Kansas program approval to the Kansas State Board of Education. Programs must be submitted to KSDE for review eighteen months prior to the onsite accreditation visit.
5.16.1.3. As evidence of quality, CAEP accepts the program approval decisions of the Kansas State Board of Education in addition to the SPAs that are recognized by the U.S. Department of Education or the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. Proper documentation of current program approval must be presented by the EPP.
State Review by State Authority. The TDOE conducts program reviews for purposes of State approval and to inform CAEP Accreditation. An EPP selecting the State Review option will follow TDOE guidelines. The TDOE provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State standards for licensure program approval. Upon an EPP’s completion of the TDOE authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval through an iterative process facilitated by the TDOE. The TDOE takes into account the reviewers’ recommendations and annual reports data to make action recommendations to the Advisory Committee on Educator Preparation (ACEP). The ACEP reviews all final outcomes and makes a recommendation to TDOE. The SBE makes the final decision on the approval of any program.
State Review by State Authority. The state authority conducts program reviews for purposes of state approval and to inform CAEP accreditation. The state authority provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State Standards for certificate program approval. Upon completion of the state authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. The state authority makes the final decision on approval of all programs. The Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board shall be the sole State Authority for purposes of this agreement.
State Review by State Authority. The State conducts program reviews for purposes of State approval and to inform CAEP accreditation. An EPP undergoing the State Review option will follow State guidelines. The State provides information on all State adopted standards, requirements, and procedures for licensure/certificate program approval. The State makes the final decision on the approval of any program. The CAEP Evaluation Team will consider evidence that the EPP presents as gathered from the State Review process to meet the sufficiency criteria related to CAEP Standard R1, Component R1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard RA1, Component RA1.2 (Advanced).
State Review by State Authority. TSPC conducts program reviews for purposes of state approval and to inform CAEP Accreditation. An EPP selecting the State Review option will follow TSPC guidelines. TSPC provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State standards for licensure/certificate program approval. Upon an EPP’s completion of TSPC authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. TSPC makes the final decision on the approval of any program.
State Review by State Authority. The State conducts program reviews for purposes of State approval and to inform CAEP accreditation. An EPP undergoing the State Review option will follow State guidelines. The State provides forms and instructions on how to meet all State standards for licensure/certificate program approval. Upon an EPP’s completion of the State authority forms, trained reviewers are selected and assigned within appropriate content areas. Reviewers make recommendations for further action and/or approval. The State makes the final decision on the approval of any program. The CAEP Evaluation Team will consider evidence that the EPP presents as gathered from the State Review process to meet the sufficiency criteria related to CAEP Standard 1, Component R1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard RA1, Component RA1.2 (Advanced). CAEP Evidence Review of Standard 1/A.1. Evidence for the CAEP Evidence Review of Standard 1/A.1 process is developed through the analysis of an EPP’s outcome assessment data aligned to specialty licensure area standards delineated in CAEP Standard 1, Component R1.2 (Initial) and/or Standard A1, Component RA1.2 (Advanced). CAEP’s Evidence Review of Standard 1/A.1 provides information to the State on both the alignment of evidence with state standards in an area of licensure and the disaggregated results that may be used for internal review of programs to demonstrate candidates’ ability to apply content and pedagogical knowledge in the area of licensure. The specific timeline established for the review of an EPP, as well as CAEP’s consideration of any request for an extension, will be decided by CAEP or the Accreditation Council, as appropriate, on a case-by-case basis and in accordance with CAEP policies. Once granted full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP’s term of accreditation shall be seven (7) years. Shorter terms are granted with a decision of Accreditation with Stipulations or Probationary Accreditation. Throughout its term, to maintain accreditation, an EPP must comply with CAEP policies, including policies regarding payment of annual dues and the submission of annual reports. An EPP for which the Accreditation Council issues a decision to deny or revoke accreditation may have a right to petition for an appeal subject to CAEP’s policy on appeals. The State will provide to CAEP its policy leading to a “Change in State Status.” The State will notify CAEP within thirty (30) days of action taken when a CAEP-accredited EPP has had a “Change in State Status” as a resu...
