Summary and Comparison of Alternatives Sample Clauses

Summary and Comparison of Alternatives. Table 5-2Summary and Comparison of Alternative Plans Item or Concern No-Action Alternative (Future without Project) Levee Alternative 1 (XXX Recommended) Levee Alternative 2 Measures to address: - Flooding Continued periodic flooding Construction of levee system Construction of levee system Installation Cost NRCS Contribution $0 $2,576,600 $4,803,000 SLO Contribution $0 $705,600 $697,000 Total $0 $3,282,200 $5,500,000 XXX Account Avg. Annual Cost Installation O, M, & R Total $0 $123,200 $207,100 $0 $13,050 $12,000 $0 $136,250 $219,100 Annual Benefits $ 0 $201,000 $201,000 Annual Costs $ 0 $136,250 $219,100 Annual Net Benefits $ 0 $64,750 -$18,100 Annual Remaining Flood Damage $ 7,613 $ 0 $ 0 Environmental Quality (EQ) Account Soil Impacts to soil resources would not change. Temporary and permanent impacts from construction activities due to compaction from heavy equipment could occur. Soil erosion may occur if areas of soil remain exposed and bare during and after construction activities. Similar to Levee Alternative 1. Agriculture and Prime Farmland Periodic flooding conditions would continue to pose difficult farming conditions. Construction impacts: Permanent removal: - 7 acres cultivated Construction impacts: Permanent removal: - 30 acres cultivated cropland cropland - 4 acres prime farmland - 8 acres prime farmland Item or Concern No-Action Alternative (Future without Project) Levee Alternative 1 (XXX Recommended) Levee Alternative 2 Temporary impact during construction: Temporary impact during construction: - 43 acres cultivated - 17 acres cultivated cropland cropland - 35 acres prime - 11 acres prime farmland farmland Operational impacts: Operational impacts: Flood protection for approximately 31 acres and increased risk to approximately 57 acres of cultivated cropland outside the levee system. During operation of the levee a net increase of 23 acres of prime farmland would be protected from 100-year flood events. Flood protection for approximately 108 acres and increased risk to approximately 136 acres of cultivated cropland outside the levee system. During operation of the levee a net increase of 84 acres of prime farmland would be protected from 100-year flood events. Waters of the U.S. Impacts to waters of the U.S. would not change. Direct impacts to waters of the U.S. are not anticipated from construction of Levee Alternative 1. Potential indirect impacts could occur from the alteration of overland flow outside of the levee system. Placement ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Summary and Comparison of Alternatives

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative. 17.2 The Contractor will ensure that there will be dedicated resources to enable the smooth running of the Framework Agreement and a clear plan of contacts at various levels within the Contractor's organisation. Framework Public Bodies may look to migrate to this Framework Agreement as and when their current contractual arrangements expire. The Contractor will where necessary assign additional personnel to this Framework Agreement to ensure agreed service levels are maintained and to ensure a consistent level of service is delivered to all Framework Public Bodies. 17.3 In addition to annual meetings with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager, the Contractor is expected to develop relationships with nominated individuals within each of the Framework Public Bodies to ensure that the level of service provided on a local basis is satisfactory. Where specific problems are identified locally, the Contractor will attempt to resolve such problems with the nominated individual within that organisation. The Authority's Strategic Contract Manager will liaise (or meet as appropriate) regularly with the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager, and where common problems are identified, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to liaise with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to agree a satisfactory course of action. Where the Contractor becomes aware of a trend that would have a negative effect on one or more of the Framework Public Bodies, they should immediately notify the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to discuss corrective action. 17.4 Regular meetings, frequency to be advised by Framework Public Body, will be held between the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of their Call-Off Contract(s) under this Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Reports will be provided by the Contractor to the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager at least 14 days prior to the these meetings. 17.5 Performance review meetings will also be held annually, between the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of the Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators. A summary of the quarterly reports will be provided by the Contractor at least 14 days prior to these meetings. 17.6 The Authority will gather the outputs from contract management to review under the areas detailed in the table below. Provision of management reports 90% to be submitted within 10 working days of the month end Report any incident affecting the delivery of the Service(s) to the Framework Public Body 100% to be reported in writing to FPB within 24 hours of the incident being reported by telephone/email Prompt payment of sub-contractors and/or consortia members (if applicable). Maximum of 30 from receipt of payment from Framework Public Bodies, 10 days target 100% within 30 days

  • Performance Standards The Contractor agrees to perform all tasks and provide deliverables as set forth in the Contract. The Department and the Customer will be entitled at all times, upon request, to be advised as to the status of work being done by the Contractor and of the details thereof.

  • Performance and Compliance Purchaser shall have performed all of the covenants and complied, in all material respects, with all the provisions required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by it on or before the Closing.

  • Performance Standard The Department’s Grant Manager will review the documentation to verify that the deliverables have been completed as described above. Upon review and written acceptance by the Department’s Grant Manager, the Grantee may proceed with payment request submittal. Payment Request Schedule: The Grantee may submit a payment request for cost reimbursement no more frequently than monthly.

  • EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS 29.1 The Employer will evaluate and compare only the Bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clause 26. 29.2 In evaluating the Bids, the Employer will determine for each Bid the evaluated Bid Price by adjusting the Bid Price as follows: (a) Making any correction for errors pursuant to Clause 27; or (b) Making an appropriate adjustments for any other acceptable variations, deviations; and (c) Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with Sub Clause 22.5. 29.3 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Bidding documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Employer shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.4 The estimated effect of the price adjustment conditions under Clause 47 of the Conditions of Contract, during the period of implementation of the Contract, will not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.5 If the Bid of the successful Bidder is seriously unbalanced in relation to the Engineer’s estimate of the cost of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the Bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bill of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the performance security set forth in Clause 34 be increased at the expense of the successful Bidder to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of default of the successful Bidder under the Contract. 30. (Deleted)

  • Measuring DNS parameters Every minute, every DNS probe will make an UDP or TCP “DNS test” to each of the public-­‐DNS registered “IP addresses” of the name servers of the domain name being monitored. If a “DNS test” result is undefined/unanswered, the tested IP will be considered unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Project Objectives 1.1 (Type the Project objectives)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!